A randomized comparison between classical landmark-based and ultrasound-guided right superficial cervical plexus block in attenuating postlaparoscopic shoulder pain under subarachnoid anesthesia

IF 0.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Parthasarathy Srinivasan, Balachandar Saravanan, Thiagarajan Chandramohan
{"title":"A randomized comparison between classical landmark-based and ultrasound-guided right superficial cervical plexus block in attenuating postlaparoscopic shoulder pain under subarachnoid anesthesia","authors":"Parthasarathy Srinivasan, Balachandar Saravanan, Thiagarajan Chandramohan","doi":"10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_67_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postlaparoscopic shoulder pain is believed to be due to phrenic nerve involvement, with an incidence of 35%–80%. Classical landmark-based right superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) has been utilized to alleviate postlaparoscopic shoulder pain. However, there is no possibility of phrenic nerve blockade with subcutaneously deposited injectate in landmark-based SCPB. Therefore, we hypothesized that the local anesthetic injectate in the sternocleidomastoid-scalene intermuscular fascial plane under ultrasound guidance is paramount in achieving phrenic nerve blockade. The main objective was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided right SCPB in decreasing postlaparoscopic shoulder pain compared to conventional landmark-guided SCPB. Methods: In this prospective randomized trial, 79 adult patients reported for laparoscopic surgeries under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into groups; A and B. Group A patients received intermediate approach to SCPB with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. Group B patients received SCPB using a classical landmark-based approach. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative shoulder pain and other adverse effects were noted. Results: Intraoperative shoulder pain was significantly less in Group A than in Group B (5% vs. 43.5%, P < 0.001). The postoperative shoulder pain was also significantly reduced in Group A than in Group B (5% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.013). There were no instances of major adverse effects. Conclusion: We conclude that the ultrasound-guided injectate in the sternocleidomastoid-scalene intermuscular space deeper to investing layer but superficial to the prevertebral layer of the deep cervical fascia is central to providing superior shoulder pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under spinal anesthesia than the classical landmark-based SCPB.","PeriodicalId":8534,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_67_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postlaparoscopic shoulder pain is believed to be due to phrenic nerve involvement, with an incidence of 35%–80%. Classical landmark-based right superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) has been utilized to alleviate postlaparoscopic shoulder pain. However, there is no possibility of phrenic nerve blockade with subcutaneously deposited injectate in landmark-based SCPB. Therefore, we hypothesized that the local anesthetic injectate in the sternocleidomastoid-scalene intermuscular fascial plane under ultrasound guidance is paramount in achieving phrenic nerve blockade. The main objective was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided right SCPB in decreasing postlaparoscopic shoulder pain compared to conventional landmark-guided SCPB. Methods: In this prospective randomized trial, 79 adult patients reported for laparoscopic surgeries under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into groups; A and B. Group A patients received intermediate approach to SCPB with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. Group B patients received SCPB using a classical landmark-based approach. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative shoulder pain and other adverse effects were noted. Results: Intraoperative shoulder pain was significantly less in Group A than in Group B (5% vs. 43.5%, P < 0.001). The postoperative shoulder pain was also significantly reduced in Group A than in Group B (5% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.013). There were no instances of major adverse effects. Conclusion: We conclude that the ultrasound-guided injectate in the sternocleidomastoid-scalene intermuscular space deeper to investing layer but superficial to the prevertebral layer of the deep cervical fascia is central to providing superior shoulder pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under spinal anesthesia than the classical landmark-based SCPB.
经典地标式和超声引导下的右侧颈浅丛阻滞减轻蛛网膜下腔麻醉下腹腔镜后肩关节疼痛的随机比较
背景:腹腔镜后肩部疼痛被认为是由膈神经受累引起的,发生率为35%-80%。经典地标为基础的右颈浅丛阻滞(SCPB)已被用于缓解腹腔镜后肩关节疼痛。然而,在地标性SCPB中,皮下沉积注射剂不可能阻断膈神经。因此,我们假设超声引导下在胸锁乳突肌-斜角肌筋膜平面注射局部麻醉剂对实现膈神经阻断至关重要。主要目的是评估超声引导下的右侧SCPB与传统地标引导下的SCPB相比,在减少腹腔镜后肩关节疼痛方面的效果。方法:在这项前瞻性随机试验中,79例脊髓麻醉下行腹腔镜手术的成人患者随机分为两组;A、b组患者采用超声引导下0.5%布比卡因10 ml行SCPB中间入路。B组患者采用经典的地标性方法接受SCPB。观察术中、术后肩痛及其他不良反应的发生率。结果:A组术中肩关节疼痛明显少于B组(5% vs. 43.5%, P < 0.001)。A组术后肩关节疼痛明显减轻(5% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.013)。没有出现严重的副作用。结论:超声引导下的胸锁乳突肌-斜角肌间隙注射比传统的地标式SCPB更能有效缓解腰麻下腹腔镜手术患者的肩痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信