Atlantic Environments and the American South ed. by Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson (review)

Arris Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/arr.2023.a909926
William Bryan
{"title":"Atlantic Environments and the American South ed. by Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson (review)","authors":"William Bryan","doi":"10.1353/arr.2023.a909926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Atlantic Environments and the American South ed. by Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson William Bryan Atlantic Environments and the American South. Edited by Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2020. Hardcover ISBN: 9780820356488 Paperback ISBN: 9780820356693 Hardcover: 242 pages It is time for environmental historians to work outside the lines. Since the field was established more than five decades ago, environmental history has provided a way to cut across political boundaries and shed light on relationships between far-flung areas. While some of the best environmental histories have done this—from William Cronon’s Nature’s Metropolis to Bathsheba Demuth’s Floating Coast: An Environmental History of the Bering Strait—scholars writing about the American South have been slow to think beyond the region.1 Though the South has much in common with the Caribbean and Latin America, environmental historians have only recently considered questions that reach beyond familiar boundaries. This timely volume—which originated at a symposium at Rice University in 2016—lays out a new agenda for southern and environmental history by considering these fields within a broader Atlantic world. Despite some resonances, the fields of Atlantic, environmental, and southern history have not had much “cross-field pollination” (2). According to the volume’s editors, Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson, this is because “scholars in each burgeoning field were interested in different problems” (3). Environmental historians, for instance, addressed questions that stemmed from the American environmental movement while Atlantic historians focused on imperial power and the institution of slavery. Previous generations of southern historians viewed the environment in simplistic terms and only defined the South by the shadow of the Confederacy. This volume brings together historians working on a variety of topics in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries across many geographies. Taken together, these essays provide a helpful framework for asking the kinds of questions that will push research in new directions. The book is divided into four sections framed around the defining themes of Atlantic history: slavery and empire. Although historians have written extensively about slavery, the first section adds new contours by considering how ideas about climate intersected with slavery. A fascinating essay by Sean Morey Smith shows how European pamphleteers shifted from describing the climate of the Carolinas as healthy to hot and disease-prone to naturalize slavery and underwrite the expansion of the institution. Elaine LaFay focuses on the plantation’s built environment through the ventilation of slave quarters. Whereas planters often promoted ventilation as a paternalistic strategy of bringing efficiency and health to the plantation, enslaved people resisted by finding other ways to ventilate their living spaces. LaFay concludes that “ventilation of slave quarters was a site of resistance” where struggles over people and nature played out (56). The next section explores the relationship between physical landscapes and slavery. Matthew Mulcahy shows that drought posed a serious risk for enslaved people in the British Caribbean, more even than hurricanes. Mulcahy argues that plantation agriculture—particularly staple crop monoculture—made the area vulnerable and presents convincing evidence to show how drought sparked resistance from enslaved people. Focusing on the American Southeast in the seventeenth century, Hayley Negrin shows how European settlers had their expectations about gender roles and agricultural labor stymied by the realities of the physical landscape, particularly when settlers [End Page 64] adopted Native American crops and relied on the agricultural labor of enslaved Native American women. The third section considers the intersection of infrastructures—broadly conceived—and empire. Focusing on colonial North Carolina, Bradford J. Wood trains his attention on the Atlantic Ocean itself. According to Wood, the ocean did not promote transatlantic ties. Rather, the physically imposing coastline produced a sense of isolation, and colonists adopted subsistence lifestyles that were far removed from the capitalist plantation economy that dominated much of the coastal South. Frances Kolb uncovers how colonial traders used waterways flowing into the Lower Mississippi River to extend British trade networks and outmaneuver the Spanish as French power waned, strengthening the plantation economy and tying the region to the African slave trade. The final section explores how empire was extended through on-the-ground knowledge of...","PeriodicalId":478414,"journal":{"name":"Arris","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arr.2023.a909926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Atlantic Environments and the American South ed. by Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson William Bryan Atlantic Environments and the American South. Edited by Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2020. Hardcover ISBN: 9780820356488 Paperback ISBN: 9780820356693 Hardcover: 242 pages It is time for environmental historians to work outside the lines. Since the field was established more than five decades ago, environmental history has provided a way to cut across political boundaries and shed light on relationships between far-flung areas. While some of the best environmental histories have done this—from William Cronon’s Nature’s Metropolis to Bathsheba Demuth’s Floating Coast: An Environmental History of the Bering Strait—scholars writing about the American South have been slow to think beyond the region.1 Though the South has much in common with the Caribbean and Latin America, environmental historians have only recently considered questions that reach beyond familiar boundaries. This timely volume—which originated at a symposium at Rice University in 2016—lays out a new agenda for southern and environmental history by considering these fields within a broader Atlantic world. Despite some resonances, the fields of Atlantic, environmental, and southern history have not had much “cross-field pollination” (2). According to the volume’s editors, Thomas Blake Earle and D. Andrew Johnson, this is because “scholars in each burgeoning field were interested in different problems” (3). Environmental historians, for instance, addressed questions that stemmed from the American environmental movement while Atlantic historians focused on imperial power and the institution of slavery. Previous generations of southern historians viewed the environment in simplistic terms and only defined the South by the shadow of the Confederacy. This volume brings together historians working on a variety of topics in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries across many geographies. Taken together, these essays provide a helpful framework for asking the kinds of questions that will push research in new directions. The book is divided into four sections framed around the defining themes of Atlantic history: slavery and empire. Although historians have written extensively about slavery, the first section adds new contours by considering how ideas about climate intersected with slavery. A fascinating essay by Sean Morey Smith shows how European pamphleteers shifted from describing the climate of the Carolinas as healthy to hot and disease-prone to naturalize slavery and underwrite the expansion of the institution. Elaine LaFay focuses on the plantation’s built environment through the ventilation of slave quarters. Whereas planters often promoted ventilation as a paternalistic strategy of bringing efficiency and health to the plantation, enslaved people resisted by finding other ways to ventilate their living spaces. LaFay concludes that “ventilation of slave quarters was a site of resistance” where struggles over people and nature played out (56). The next section explores the relationship between physical landscapes and slavery. Matthew Mulcahy shows that drought posed a serious risk for enslaved people in the British Caribbean, more even than hurricanes. Mulcahy argues that plantation agriculture—particularly staple crop monoculture—made the area vulnerable and presents convincing evidence to show how drought sparked resistance from enslaved people. Focusing on the American Southeast in the seventeenth century, Hayley Negrin shows how European settlers had their expectations about gender roles and agricultural labor stymied by the realities of the physical landscape, particularly when settlers [End Page 64] adopted Native American crops and relied on the agricultural labor of enslaved Native American women. The third section considers the intersection of infrastructures—broadly conceived—and empire. Focusing on colonial North Carolina, Bradford J. Wood trains his attention on the Atlantic Ocean itself. According to Wood, the ocean did not promote transatlantic ties. Rather, the physically imposing coastline produced a sense of isolation, and colonists adopted subsistence lifestyles that were far removed from the capitalist plantation economy that dominated much of the coastal South. Frances Kolb uncovers how colonial traders used waterways flowing into the Lower Mississippi River to extend British trade networks and outmaneuver the Spanish as French power waned, strengthening the plantation economy and tying the region to the African slave trade. The final section explores how empire was extended through on-the-ground knowledge of...
《大西洋环境与美国南方》,作者:托马斯·布莱克·厄尔和d·安德鲁·约翰逊(书评)
书评:《大西洋环境与美国南方》,作者:托马斯·布莱克·厄尔和d·安德鲁·约翰逊·威廉·布莱恩。由托马斯·布莱克·厄尔和d·安德鲁·约翰逊编辑。雅典:佐治亚大学出版社,2020。精装ISBN: 9780820356488平装ISBN: 9780820356693精装:242页现在是环境历史学家在线下工作的时候了。自从50多年前这一领域建立以来,环境史提供了一种跨越政治界限的方法,揭示了遥远地区之间的关系。虽然一些最好的环境史书已经做到了这一点——从威廉·克罗侬的《自然的大都市》到芭丝谢芭·德穆斯的《漂浮的海岸:白令海峡的环境史》——但撰写美国南部的学者们却迟迟没有考虑到该地区以外的问题虽然南方与加勒比海和拉丁美洲有很多共同之处,但环境历史学家直到最近才开始考虑超越熟悉边界的问题。这本及时的书——起源于2016年莱斯大学的一次研讨会——通过在更广阔的大西洋世界中考虑这些领域,为南方和环境历史制定了新的议程。尽管有一些共鸣,但大西洋、环境和南方历史领域并没有太多的“跨领域授粉”(2)。根据该卷的编辑托马斯·布莱克·厄尔和d·安德鲁·约翰逊的说法,这是因为“每个新兴领域的学者对不同的问题感兴趣”(3)。解决了源于美国环境运动的问题,而大西洋历史学家则专注于帝国权力和奴隶制制度。前几代南方历史学家对环境的看法过于简单化,只根据南部联盟的阴影来定义南方。这卷汇集了历史学家对各种主题在十七和十八世纪跨越许多地理。综上所述,这些文章提供了一个有用的框架来提出各种问题,这些问题将推动研究向新的方向发展。这本书分为四个部分,围绕大西洋历史的定义主题:奴隶制和帝国。虽然历史学家已经写了大量关于奴隶制的文章,但第一部分通过考虑气候与奴隶制的交叉,增加了新的轮廓。肖恩·莫雷·史密斯(Sean Morey Smith)的一篇引人入胜的文章展示了欧洲小册子作者是如何从将卡罗来纳的气候描述为健康、炎热和易患病,转变为将奴隶制归化,并为该制度的扩张背书的。伊莱恩·拉菲通过奴隶宿舍的通风来关注种植园的建筑环境。种植园主经常提倡通风,作为一种家长式的策略,为种植园带来效率和健康,而被奴役的人们则通过寻找其他方式让他们的生活空间通风来抵抗。拉法伊总结说,“奴隶宿舍的通风是一个抵抗的场所”,在那里,人们与自然的斗争开始了(56)。下一节探讨自然景观和奴隶制之间的关系。马修·马尔卡希(Matthew Mulcahy)指出,干旱对英属加勒比地区被奴役的人构成了严重的威胁,甚至比飓风还要严重。Mulcahy认为,种植农业——尤其是单一种植的主要作物——使该地区变得脆弱,并提供了令人信服的证据,表明干旱如何引发了奴隶的抵抗。海莉·内格林(Hayley Negrin)聚焦于17世纪的美国东南部,展示了欧洲定居者对性别角色和农业劳动力的期望是如何受到自然景观现实的阻碍的,特别是当定居者采用美洲土著作物并依赖被奴役的美洲土著妇女的农业劳动力时。第三部分考虑了基础设施(广义的概念)与帝国的交集。布拉德福德·j·伍德(Bradford J. Wood)将注意力集中在殖民时期的北卡罗来纳州,将注意力集中在大西洋本身。根据伍德的说法,海洋并没有促进跨大西洋关系。更确切地说,令人印象深刻的海岸线产生了一种孤立感,殖民者采取了与主导南方沿海大部分地区的资本主义种植园经济相去甚远的自给自足的生活方式。弗朗西丝·科尔布揭示了殖民商人如何利用流入密西西比河下游的水道来扩展英国的贸易网络,并在法国势力减弱时战胜西班牙人,加强种植园经济,并将该地区与非洲奴隶贸易联系起来。最后一节探讨了帝国是如何通过对……的实地了解而扩张的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信