Altruism in coalition formation games

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Anna Maria Kerkmann, Simon Cramer, Jörg Rothe
{"title":"Altruism in coalition formation games","authors":"Anna Maria Kerkmann,&nbsp;Simon Cramer,&nbsp;Jörg Rothe","doi":"10.1007/s10472-023-09881-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nguyen et al. (2016) introduced altruistic hedonic games in which agents’ utilities depend not only on their own preferences but also on those of their friends in the same coalition. We propose to extend their model to coalition formation games in general, considering also the friends in other coalitions. Comparing our model to altruistic hedonic games, we argue that excluding some friends from the altruistic behavior of an agent is a major disadvantage that comes with the restriction to hedonic games. After introducing our model and showing some desirable properties, we additionally study some common stability notions and provide a computational analysis of the associated verification and existence problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7971,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"92 3","pages":"601 - 629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10472-023-09881-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10472-023-09881-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nguyen et al. (2016) introduced altruistic hedonic games in which agents’ utilities depend not only on their own preferences but also on those of their friends in the same coalition. We propose to extend their model to coalition formation games in general, considering also the friends in other coalitions. Comparing our model to altruistic hedonic games, we argue that excluding some friends from the altruistic behavior of an agent is a major disadvantage that comes with the restriction to hedonic games. After introducing our model and showing some desirable properties, we additionally study some common stability notions and provide a computational analysis of the associated verification and existence problems.

结盟博弈中的利他主义
Nguyen 等人(2016 年)引入了利他主义享乐博弈,在这种博弈中,代理人的效用不仅取决于他们自己的偏好,还取决于他们在同一联盟中的朋友的偏好。我们建议将他们的模型扩展到一般的联盟形成博弈,同时考虑其他联盟中的朋友。将我们的模型与利他主义享乐博弈相比较,我们认为,将一些朋友排除在代理人的利他行为之外是限制享乐博弈的一个主要缺点。在介绍了我们的模型并展示了一些理想特性之后,我们还研究了一些常见的稳定性概念,并对相关的验证和存在问题进行了计算分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence presents a range of topics of concern to scholars applying quantitative, combinatorial, logical, algebraic and algorithmic methods to diverse areas of Artificial Intelligence, from decision support, automated deduction, and reasoning, to knowledge-based systems, machine learning, computer vision, robotics and planning. The journal features collections of papers appearing either in volumes (400 pages) or in separate issues (100-300 pages), which focus on one topic and have one or more guest editors. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence hopes to influence the spawning of new areas of applied mathematics and strengthen the scientific underpinnings of Artificial Intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信