Improving public services delivery: Economists’ perspective

IF 0.5 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Vitaly L. Tambovtsev, Irina A. Rozhdestvenskaya
{"title":"Improving public services delivery: Economists’ perspective","authors":"Vitaly L. Tambovtsev, Irina A. Rozhdestvenskaya","doi":"10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving public services delivery is one of the central tasks of public administration reforms, which substantiates the high importance of analysing approaches to tackling it. The paper discusses avenues for enhancing the quality of public services delivery in the light of the findings of the latest economic research. Methodologically, the study rests on the principles of public administration. The research methods of content analysis and systematization were applied. The results of the study show that today’s approaches to improving public services do not take into account the important aspects of their production and delivery, which are revealed by the principal-agent model and the concept of search, experience and credence goods that has over half a century of history. The article shows that the empirically established negative consequences of new public management applied in the areas, such as health care and education, are direct consequences of this neglect. We formulate a number of proposals concerning the improvement of public services delivery, namely to consider the type of service, to distinguish between the quality of service and the quality of servicing, and to produce credence goods and high-quality services in non-profit organizations while involving workers oriented towards serving the society.","PeriodicalId":42955,"journal":{"name":"Upravlenets-The Manager","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlenets-The Manager","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving public services delivery is one of the central tasks of public administration reforms, which substantiates the high importance of analysing approaches to tackling it. The paper discusses avenues for enhancing the quality of public services delivery in the light of the findings of the latest economic research. Methodologically, the study rests on the principles of public administration. The research methods of content analysis and systematization were applied. The results of the study show that today’s approaches to improving public services do not take into account the important aspects of their production and delivery, which are revealed by the principal-agent model and the concept of search, experience and credence goods that has over half a century of history. The article shows that the empirically established negative consequences of new public management applied in the areas, such as health care and education, are direct consequences of this neglect. We formulate a number of proposals concerning the improvement of public services delivery, namely to consider the type of service, to distinguish between the quality of service and the quality of servicing, and to produce credence goods and high-quality services in non-profit organizations while involving workers oriented towards serving the society.
改善公共服务提供:经济学家的视角
改善公共服务的提供是公共行政改革的中心任务之一,这证明分析解决这一问题的方法非常重要。本文结合最新的经济研究成果,探讨了提高公共服务质量的途径。在方法上,这项研究以公共行政的原则为基础。采用内容分析和系统化的研究方法。研究结果表明,今天改善公共服务的方法没有考虑到它们的生产和交付的重要方面,这是由委托代理模型和有半个多世纪历史的搜索、体验和信任商品的概念所揭示的。文章表明,在卫生保健和教育等领域应用新公共管理的经验确定的负面后果是这种忽视的直接后果。我们就改善公共服务的提供,提出多项建议,包括考虑服务种类、区分服务质素和服务质素、在非牟利机构生产诚信产品和优质服务,同时让服务社会的工作人员参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信