Increased Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence Among Gender-Diverse People on Testosterone [ID: 1377373]

Jennifer Wong, Olga Ramm, Shayna Vega, Miranda Weintraub, Richie Houhong Xu, Eve Zaritsky
{"title":"Increased Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence Among Gender-Diverse People on Testosterone [ID: 1377373]","authors":"Jennifer Wong, Olga Ramm, Shayna Vega, Miranda Weintraub, Richie Houhong Xu, Eve Zaritsky","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930020.37123.0c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Testosterone-induced vaginal atrophy is hypothesized to increase the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD); however, current studies are limited and conflicting. This study compares risk of VCD among gender-diverse people on testosterone (GDT) and ciswomen (CW) and evaluates factors associated with VCD. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was conducted among adults who underwent total hysterectomy (June 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019) for benign indications at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Patients had 6 months postoperative follow-up, and GDT had greater than 6 months testosterone use prior to hysterectomy. Differences between GDT and CW were evaluated using Wald χ 2 , Fisher’s exact, Student’s t test, or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Unadjusted logistic regression was conducted to estimate odds ratios (OR) for VCD. RESULTS: The cohort (n=22,109) included 154 (0.7%) GDT and 21,995 (99.3%) CW. GDT were younger (median 27 [interquartile range (IQR) 22–36] versus 47 [IQR 42–52] years, P <.001) and had lower proportion with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) greater than or equal to 1 (18.2% versus 27.1%, P =.013) than CW. A greater proportion of GDT experienced VCD (5.8% versus 2.5%, P <.016; OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.23–4.77, P =.011). Patients with CCI greater than or equal to 1 or had hypertension were associated with 25% (95% CI 4–50%, P =.015) and 41% (95% CI 18–68%, P <.001) higher odds of VCD, respectively. CONCLUSION: The odds of VCD was 2.4 times higher in GDT despite being younger and healthier than CW. Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1 or higher and hypertension were also associated with higher risk of VCD. These findings support the theory of testosterone-induced vaginal atrophy as a risk factor for VCD. Additional studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology of VCD among GDT and prevent this morbid complication.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930020.37123.0c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Testosterone-induced vaginal atrophy is hypothesized to increase the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD); however, current studies are limited and conflicting. This study compares risk of VCD among gender-diverse people on testosterone (GDT) and ciswomen (CW) and evaluates factors associated with VCD. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was conducted among adults who underwent total hysterectomy (June 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019) for benign indications at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Patients had 6 months postoperative follow-up, and GDT had greater than 6 months testosterone use prior to hysterectomy. Differences between GDT and CW were evaluated using Wald χ 2 , Fisher’s exact, Student’s t test, or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Unadjusted logistic regression was conducted to estimate odds ratios (OR) for VCD. RESULTS: The cohort (n=22,109) included 154 (0.7%) GDT and 21,995 (99.3%) CW. GDT were younger (median 27 [interquartile range (IQR) 22–36] versus 47 [IQR 42–52] years, P <.001) and had lower proportion with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) greater than or equal to 1 (18.2% versus 27.1%, P =.013) than CW. A greater proportion of GDT experienced VCD (5.8% versus 2.5%, P <.016; OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.23–4.77, P =.011). Patients with CCI greater than or equal to 1 or had hypertension were associated with 25% (95% CI 4–50%, P =.015) and 41% (95% CI 18–68%, P <.001) higher odds of VCD, respectively. CONCLUSION: The odds of VCD was 2.4 times higher in GDT despite being younger and healthier than CW. Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1 or higher and hypertension were also associated with higher risk of VCD. These findings support the theory of testosterone-induced vaginal atrophy as a risk factor for VCD. Additional studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology of VCD among GDT and prevent this morbid complication.
睾酮对不同性别人群阴道袖带破裂的影响[j]
简介:睾酮诱导的阴道萎缩被认为会增加阴道袖带破裂(VCD)的风险;然而,目前的研究是有限和相互矛盾的。本研究比较了不同性别的睾酮(GDT)和顺性女性(CW)患VCD的风险,并评估了与VCD相关的因素。方法:一项经irb批准的回顾性队列研究在Kaiser Permanente北加州进行了良性适应症的全子宫切除术(2014年6月1日至2019年12月31日)的成年人中进行。患者术后随访6个月,GDT在子宫切除术前使用睾酮超过6个月。使用Wald χ 2、Fisher精确检验、Student t检验或Kruskal-Wallis检验评估GDT和CW之间的差异。采用未经校正的逻辑回归来估计VCD的优势比(OR)。结果:该队列(n= 22109)包括154例(0.7%)GDT和21995例(99.3%)CW。GDT患者较年轻(中位数为27[四分位数间距(IQR) 22-36]对47 [IQR 42-52]岁,P < 001),且Charlson共病指数(CCI)大于或等于1的比例较CW患者低(18.2%对27.1%,P = 0.013)。GDT经历VCD的比例更高(5.8% vs 2.5%, P <或2.42,95% ci 1.23-4.77, p = 0.011)。CCI大于等于1或有高血压的患者发生VCD的几率分别增加25% (95% CI 4-50%, P = 0.015)和41% (95% CI 18-68%, P < 0.001)。结论:GDT患者年轻健康,但VCD的发生率是CW患者的2.4倍。Charlson合并症指数≥1和高血压也与VCD的高风险相关。这些发现支持睾酮诱导的阴道萎缩是VCD危险因素的理论。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解GDT中VCD的病理生理学和预防这种病态并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信