Geospatial Analysis of Access to Evidence-Based Early Pregnancy Loss Management in New Mexico [ID: 1377363]

Jamie Krashin, Patricia Black, Eric Brannen, Charlotte Gard, Yan Lin, Courtney Schreiber
{"title":"Geospatial Analysis of Access to Evidence-Based Early Pregnancy Loss Management in New Mexico [ID: 1377363]","authors":"Jamie Krashin, Patricia Black, Eric Brannen, Charlotte Gard, Yan Lin, Courtney Schreiber","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930208.00402.a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Little is known about availability of evidence-based early pregnancy loss (EPL) treatment in emergency departments (EDs), where patients often first seek care. We evaluated geographic access to mifepristone/misoprostol and uterine aspiration in New Mexican hospitals. METHODS: We used an enhanced two-step floating catchment area method to model accessibility from census block groups’ population-weighted centroids to hospitals. Our primary outcome was access to mifepristone/misoprostol and uterine aspiration in EDs; our secondary outcome was access to in-hospital aspiration, both outcomes defined as less than a 60-minute commute. We surveyed all EDs in New Mexico and used public databases to compute census block groups’ demographic, transportation, rurality, and area deprivation data. We used logistic regression to evaluate the associations between access and race and ethnicity, area deprivation, and rural location. The University of New Mexico IRB approved this study. RESULTS: Thirty-five (83%) of 42 hospitals responded. Two (6%) provided in-ED treatment, and 24 (69%) in-hospital aspiration. Half of reproductive-aged women had access to in-ED treatment, and 90% to in-hospital aspiration. Census block groups with higher quartile proportions of American Indian/Native Alaskan reproductive-aged women had higher adjusted odds ratios of accessing in-ED treatment (2.5–7.3, P <.05). Rural areas and higher area deprivation quartiles had lower in-ED access adjusted odds ratios (0.03–0.07 [ P <.05] and 0.3–0.4 [ P <.05], respectively) compared with urban and lower area deprivation quartiles. In-hospital aspiration results were similar to in-ED treatment results across all categories. CONCLUSION: By prioritizing rural areas and areas with higher socioeconomic deprivation, EPL treatment implementation efforts can improve equitable care access and equity for patients.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930208.00402.a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about availability of evidence-based early pregnancy loss (EPL) treatment in emergency departments (EDs), where patients often first seek care. We evaluated geographic access to mifepristone/misoprostol and uterine aspiration in New Mexican hospitals. METHODS: We used an enhanced two-step floating catchment area method to model accessibility from census block groups’ population-weighted centroids to hospitals. Our primary outcome was access to mifepristone/misoprostol and uterine aspiration in EDs; our secondary outcome was access to in-hospital aspiration, both outcomes defined as less than a 60-minute commute. We surveyed all EDs in New Mexico and used public databases to compute census block groups’ demographic, transportation, rurality, and area deprivation data. We used logistic regression to evaluate the associations between access and race and ethnicity, area deprivation, and rural location. The University of New Mexico IRB approved this study. RESULTS: Thirty-five (83%) of 42 hospitals responded. Two (6%) provided in-ED treatment, and 24 (69%) in-hospital aspiration. Half of reproductive-aged women had access to in-ED treatment, and 90% to in-hospital aspiration. Census block groups with higher quartile proportions of American Indian/Native Alaskan reproductive-aged women had higher adjusted odds ratios of accessing in-ED treatment (2.5–7.3, P <.05). Rural areas and higher area deprivation quartiles had lower in-ED access adjusted odds ratios (0.03–0.07 [ P <.05] and 0.3–0.4 [ P <.05], respectively) compared with urban and lower area deprivation quartiles. In-hospital aspiration results were similar to in-ED treatment results across all categories. CONCLUSION: By prioritizing rural areas and areas with higher socioeconomic deprivation, EPL treatment implementation efforts can improve equitable care access and equity for patients.
基于证据的早期妊娠损失管理的地理空间分析[j]
简介:在急诊室(EDs),患者通常首先寻求治疗的地方,对基于证据的早期妊娠丢失(EPL)治疗的可用性知之甚少。我们评估了新墨西哥州医院米非司酮/米索前列醇和子宫抽吸的地理可及性。方法:采用改进的两步浮动集水区法,对人口加权中心点到医院的可达性进行建模。我们的主要结局是急症患者获得米非司酮/米索前列醇和子宫抽吸;我们的次要终点是医院内吸痰的可及性,这两个终点的定义都是通勤时间少于60分钟。我们调查了新墨西哥州的所有ed,并使用公共数据库计算人口普查块组的人口统计、交通、农村和地区剥夺数据。我们使用逻辑回归来评估获取与种族和民族、地区剥夺和农村位置之间的关系。新墨西哥大学伦理委员会批准了这项研究。结果:42家医院中有35家(83%)回应。2例(6%)提供急诊治疗,24例(69%)提供住院抽吸。一半的育龄妇女接受了急诊治疗,90%的育龄妇女接受了住院抽吸。美国印第安人/阿拉斯加土著育龄妇女四分位数比例较高的人口普查块组获得ed治疗的调整优势比较高(2.5-7.3,P < 0.05)。农村地区和贫困程度较高的四分位数在ed准入调整后的优势比较低(0.03-0.07)[P <]。05]和0.3-0.4 [P <]。[05],与城市和较低区域剥夺四分位数相比。所有类别的住院吸入结果与急诊治疗结果相似。结论:通过优先考虑农村和社会经济剥夺程度较高的地区,EPL治疗实施工作可以提高患者的公平护理机会和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信