Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnancies With Periviable and Previable Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes [ID: 1380561]

Danielle Browning, Eva Fandozzi, Christina Megli, Alexandria Sasaki
{"title":"Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnancies With Periviable and Previable Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes [ID: 1380561]","authors":"Danielle Browning, Eva Fandozzi, Christina Megli, Alexandria Sasaki","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000931060.21278.6a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) accounts for one-third of preterm deliveries and is associated with significant perinatal morbidity. Neonatal resuscitation has been extended to earlier gestational ages, including for patients with PPROM, but maternal and neonatal outcomes are not well characterized. Our objective is to compare outcomes after PPROM diagnosis prior to viability (23 weeks 0 days) or in the periviable period (23–25 weeks). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 101 pregnancies and 112 neonates from July 2015 to May 2018 were identified by maternal ICD-9/10 codes for PPROM. Exclusion criteria include PPROM greater than 24 weeks 6 days and neonatal congenital anomalies. Detailed chart review was performed. Patients were stratified by gestational age (GA) at PPROM and groups were compared according to GA. Chi-square test was used for dichotomous variables and t test for continuous variables. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. RESULTS: 27.9% of patients who elected for expectant management delivered after viability (23 weeks 0 days or later). Neonatal death was greater after delivery from pregnancies with previable PPROM in comparison to periviable PPROM with similar gestational age at birth, P =.005. The composite adverse neonatal outcomes occurred in 100% of neonates born after previable PPROM. Maternal outcomes were elevated with both previable and periviable PPROM who elected for expectant management (52.4% versus 35.3%, NS). The maternal morbidity rate after termination of pregnancy was significantly less (26.9%) ( P =.047). CONCLUSION: Previable PPROM is associated with higher neonatal death rates, despite similar GA at delivery in comparison to periviable PPROM. Maternal morbidity is high with both previable and periviable PPROM.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000931060.21278.6a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) accounts for one-third of preterm deliveries and is associated with significant perinatal morbidity. Neonatal resuscitation has been extended to earlier gestational ages, including for patients with PPROM, but maternal and neonatal outcomes are not well characterized. Our objective is to compare outcomes after PPROM diagnosis prior to viability (23 weeks 0 days) or in the periviable period (23–25 weeks). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 101 pregnancies and 112 neonates from July 2015 to May 2018 were identified by maternal ICD-9/10 codes for PPROM. Exclusion criteria include PPROM greater than 24 weeks 6 days and neonatal congenital anomalies. Detailed chart review was performed. Patients were stratified by gestational age (GA) at PPROM and groups were compared according to GA. Chi-square test was used for dichotomous variables and t test for continuous variables. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. RESULTS: 27.9% of patients who elected for expectant management delivered after viability (23 weeks 0 days or later). Neonatal death was greater after delivery from pregnancies with previable PPROM in comparison to periviable PPROM with similar gestational age at birth, P =.005. The composite adverse neonatal outcomes occurred in 100% of neonates born after previable PPROM. Maternal outcomes were elevated with both previable and periviable PPROM who elected for expectant management (52.4% versus 35.3%, NS). The maternal morbidity rate after termination of pregnancy was significantly less (26.9%) ( P =.047). CONCLUSION: Previable PPROM is associated with higher neonatal death rates, despite similar GA at delivery in comparison to periviable PPROM. Maternal morbidity is high with both previable and periviable PPROM.
围生期和前生期早产的母婴结局[j]
前言:早产胎膜早破(PPROM)占早产的三分之一,并与显著的围产期发病率相关。新生儿复苏已经扩展到早期胎龄,包括PPROM患者,但产妇和新生儿的结局并没有很好地表征。我们的目的是比较在生存期(23周0天)或围生存期(23 - 25周)诊断PPROM后的结果。方法:采用孕产妇ICD-9/10编码对2015年7月至2018年5月的101例妊娠和112例新生儿进行PPROM鉴定。排除标准包括PPROM大于24周6天和新生儿先天性异常。进行了详细的图表审查。按胎龄(GA)分组,按胎龄进行分组比较。二分变量采用卡方检验,连续变量采用t检验。本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。结果:27.9%的患者在生存期(23周0天或更晚)后分娩。与出生时胎龄相似的围生期PPROM孕妇相比,产前PPROM分娩后新生儿死亡率更高,P = 0.005。复合不良新生儿结局发生在100%的新生儿后可再生的PPROM。选择妊娠前期和围妊娠期PPROM的产妇结局均升高(52.4%对35.3%,NS)。终止妊娠后产妇发病率明显低于对照组(26.9%)(P = 0.047)。结论:尽管分娩时GA与围生期PPROM相似,但产前PPROM与较高的新生儿死亡率相关。产前和围产期PPROM的产妇发病率都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信