Experimental Study on Effect of Recycled Reinforced Concrete Waste on Mechanical Properties and Structural behaviour of the Sandy Soil

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Ali Basha, Fatma khalifa, Sabry Fayed
{"title":"Experimental Study on Effect of Recycled Reinforced Concrete Waste on Mechanical Properties and Structural behaviour of the Sandy Soil","authors":"Ali Basha, Fatma khalifa, Sabry Fayed","doi":"10.1186/s40069-023-00612-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, constructing natural aggregates as a base layer for the roads has increased. Natural resources will run out as long as human consumption of them continues. Recycled concrete aggregate (RC) has thus emerged as a substitute material for the building of road base layers. Additionally, RC can be utilized to create interior city highways. The base layer for roads must have sufficient strength to support the working load on the pavement surface without damage deforming. As a result, the focus of this paper is on enhancing the structural performance of sandy soil reinforced with various RC percentages. The three key factors are relative soil density (Dr = 83 and 97%), recycled concrete aggregate reinforcing levels (RC = 0,5,10,15,20,25,30,40,50 and 100%), and reinforcement layer thickness (R d = 0.0B, 0.5B, B, and 2B where B is the footing model width). Numerous laboratory experiments were conducted in order to examine the impact of important parameters on the properties of the mixtures. The plate bearing tests were carried out using a footing model (250 × 250 mm) inside a tank (1500 × 1500x1000 mm) to ascertain the stress–strain response, bearing capacity ratio (BCR), ultimate bearing capacity, and modulus of elasticity of the tested mixtures. It is clear that raising the RC has no effect on the diameters of the grains. It was found that as RC increased, the mixture's bulk density increased but specific gravity decreased. Maximum dry density rose as RC rose, whereas water content fell. It was noted that BCR unquestionably increased as RC increased for all RC levels and all values of settlement ratios. The appropriate reinforcing layer thickness is suggested to be no more than 2B. As the RC concentration in the sand and R d increased, the difference between two pressure-settlement curves of densities 83% and 97% significantly decreased. Furthermore, when RC reaches 50%, two curves are roughly comparable. At RC = 50%, it is advised that the relative density of 83% is sufficient to produce the same behavior as the relative density of 97%. It was found that as RC and R d grew, the tested mixtures' ultimate bearing capacity and elasticity modulus increased as well. A novel proposed formulas are developed to compute bearing capacity ratio, ultimate bearing capacity, and elasticity modulus of the tested mixtures taking into account the influence of RC, reinforcement layer depth, settlement ratio, and the relative density, and its results agree with the experimental results.","PeriodicalId":13832,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-023-00612-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, constructing natural aggregates as a base layer for the roads has increased. Natural resources will run out as long as human consumption of them continues. Recycled concrete aggregate (RC) has thus emerged as a substitute material for the building of road base layers. Additionally, RC can be utilized to create interior city highways. The base layer for roads must have sufficient strength to support the working load on the pavement surface without damage deforming. As a result, the focus of this paper is on enhancing the structural performance of sandy soil reinforced with various RC percentages. The three key factors are relative soil density (Dr = 83 and 97%), recycled concrete aggregate reinforcing levels (RC = 0,5,10,15,20,25,30,40,50 and 100%), and reinforcement layer thickness (R d = 0.0B, 0.5B, B, and 2B where B is the footing model width). Numerous laboratory experiments were conducted in order to examine the impact of important parameters on the properties of the mixtures. The plate bearing tests were carried out using a footing model (250 × 250 mm) inside a tank (1500 × 1500x1000 mm) to ascertain the stress–strain response, bearing capacity ratio (BCR), ultimate bearing capacity, and modulus of elasticity of the tested mixtures. It is clear that raising the RC has no effect on the diameters of the grains. It was found that as RC increased, the mixture's bulk density increased but specific gravity decreased. Maximum dry density rose as RC rose, whereas water content fell. It was noted that BCR unquestionably increased as RC increased for all RC levels and all values of settlement ratios. The appropriate reinforcing layer thickness is suggested to be no more than 2B. As the RC concentration in the sand and R d increased, the difference between two pressure-settlement curves of densities 83% and 97% significantly decreased. Furthermore, when RC reaches 50%, two curves are roughly comparable. At RC = 50%, it is advised that the relative density of 83% is sufficient to produce the same behavior as the relative density of 97%. It was found that as RC and R d grew, the tested mixtures' ultimate bearing capacity and elasticity modulus increased as well. A novel proposed formulas are developed to compute bearing capacity ratio, ultimate bearing capacity, and elasticity modulus of the tested mixtures taking into account the influence of RC, reinforcement layer depth, settlement ratio, and the relative density, and its results agree with the experimental results.

Abstract Image

再生钢筋混凝土废料对砂土力学性能和结构特性影响的试验研究
摘要近年来,天然骨料作为道路基层的建设越来越多。只要人类继续消耗自然资源,自然资源就会枯竭。再生混凝土骨料(RC)因此成为道路基层建筑的替代材料。此外,钢筋混凝土还可以用于建造城市内部公路。道路基层必须有足够的强度来支撑路面上的工作荷载而不发生损伤变形。因此,本文的重点是提高不同比例钢筋混凝土加筋砂土的结构性能。三个关键因素是相对土密度(Dr = 83和97%)、再生混凝土骨料配筋水平(RC = 0、5、10、15、20、25、30、40、50和100%)和配筋层厚度(rd = 0.0B、0.5B、B和2B,其中B为基础模型宽度)。为了检验重要参数对混合物性能的影响,进行了大量的实验室实验。采用基础模型(250 × 250 mm),在1500 × 1500x1000 mm的槽内进行板承载试验,确定试验混合料的应力应变响应、承载力比(BCR)、极限承载力和弹性模量。很明显,提高RC对晶粒直径没有影响。随着RC的增加,混合料的容重增大,比重减小。最大干密度随RC的增大而增大,含水量则随RC的增大而减小。值得注意的是,对于所有RC水平和所有沉降比值,BCR无疑随着RC的增加而增加。建议适当的补强层厚度不大于2B。随着砂土中RC浓度和R d浓度的增加,密度83%和97%两条压力沉降曲线的差值显著减小。此外,当RC达到50%时,两条曲线大致可比较。在RC = 50%时,建议83%的相对密度足以产生与97%的相对密度相同的行为。结果表明,随着RC和rd的增大,试验混合料的极限承载力和弹性模量均增大。考虑RC、配筋层深度、沉降比和相对密度的影响,提出了计算试验混合料承载力比、极限承载力和弹性模量的新公式,计算结果与试验结果吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
61
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials (IJCSM) provides a forum targeted for engineers and scientists around the globe to present and discuss various topics related to concrete, concrete structures and other applied materials incorporating cement cementitious binder, and polymer or fiber in conjunction with concrete. These forums give participants an opportunity to contribute their knowledge for the advancement of society. Topics include, but are not limited to, research results on Properties and performance of concrete and concrete structures Advanced and improved experimental techniques Latest modelling methods Possible improvement and enhancement of concrete properties Structural and microstructural characterization Concrete applications Fiber reinforced concrete technology Concrete waste management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信