Arctic exceptionalism: a narrative of cooperation and conflict from Gorbachev to Medvedev and Putin

Pavel Devyatkin
{"title":"Arctic exceptionalism: a narrative of cooperation and conflict from Gorbachev to Medvedev and Putin","authors":"Pavel Devyatkin","doi":"10.1080/2154896x.2023.2258658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTArctic cooperation is increasingly being questioned in the wake of Russia’s 2022 military actions in Ukraine. Accordingly, many international scholars have declared the narrative of ‘Arctic exceptionalism’ dead or corrupted. Through an analysis of political rhetoric, this paper re-evaluates the construction of Arctic exceptionalism, popularly connected to Mikhail Gorbachev’s 1987 Murmansk speech calling for an Arctic ‘zone of peace’. It is argued that a full picture of this narrative is incomplete without consideration of the developments in Arctic cooperation and conflict in the context of Dmitry Medvedev’s modernisation and multilateralism initiatives as well as Vladimir Putin’s enduring commitment to a defensive and nationalistic foreign policy. Moreover, Medvedev and Putin diverged from Gorbachev’s Arctic exceptionalism due to disparate ideologies and views on militarisation, as well as the global context of interstate mistrust. These insights allow for a new understanding of the dilemma of cooperation and conflict in the Arctic, a microcosm of the Russia-West relationship.KEYWORDS: ArcticRussiainternational relationsforeign policycooperationsecurity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’; Kornhuber et al., ‘The Disruption of Arctic Exceptionalism’.2 Smith, ‘Melting the Myth of Arctic Exceptionalism’; Melchiorre, “The Illusion of the Arctic‘Exceptionalism’”.3 Mikkola, Paukkunen and Toveri, ‘Russian Aggression and the European Arctic’.4 Finlayson, ‘From Beliefs to Arguments’.5 Osherenko and Young, The Age of the Arctic, 5–12.6 Gorbachev, ‘Speech in Murmansk’.7 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.8 Purver, ‘Arctic Security’.9 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.10 Sergunin and Konyshev, Russia in the Arctic, 41.11 Laruelle, Russia’s Arctic Strategies, 3–5; MFA Russia, ‘O Proyekte Osnov Gosudarstvennoy Politiki V Arktike’; “Shtyrov, ‘Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v otnoshenii severnykh territoriy’.12 Dodds and Rowe, ‘Red Arctic?’.13 Pabst, Medvedev’s ‘Third Way’”.14 Tsygankov, Russia’s foreign policy, xxix.15 Hahn, ‘Medvedev, Putin, and Perestroika 2.0’; Aron, ‘Putin’s Agenda and Medvedev’s Dilemma’.16 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.17 Medvedev, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’.18 Medvedev, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’; ‘Rossiya, vperod!’.19 Flenley, ‘The partnership for modernisation’.20 Dodds, ‘The Ilulissat Declaration’.21 Medvedev, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki’.22 Medvedev, ‘Zasedaniye Soveta Bezopasnosti’.23 Medvedev, ‘Nachalo zasedaniya Soveta Bezopasnosti’.24 Medvedev, ‘Dogovor s Norvegiyey o razgranichenii morskikh prostranstv’.; “V Kopengagene sostoyalis’ rossiysko datskiye peregovory”; ‘Rossiysko finlyandskiye peregovory’.25 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam i gostyam Pervogo Murmanskogo mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma’.26 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii – Severnym morskim putom’.27 Medvedev, ‘Chilingarov naznachen spetsial’nym predstavitelem po mezhdunarodnomu sotrudnichestvu v Arktike i Antarktike’.28 Heininen, et al., ‘Russian strategies in the Arctic’.29 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.30 Lukyanov, ‘Rethinking Security in “Greater Europe”’31 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.32 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.33 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.34 Trenin, and Baev, ‘The Arctic’.35 Medvedev, ‘Rossiya ostayotsya otkrytoy i gotovoy k ravnopravnomu sotrudnichestvu’.36 Kydd, ‘Trust, reassurance, and cooperation’.37 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic?’.38 Wilson Rowe and Blakkisrud, ‘A new kind of Arctic Power?’.39 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya s “ser’yeznym napryazheniyem” sledit za aktivnost’yu NATO v Arktike’.40 Petrov, ‘Putin nadel na belogo medvedya sputnikovyy peredatchik’.41 Putin, ‘Rechi Putina i Shoygu na I Mezhdunarodnom arkticheskom forume’.42 Putin, ‘Ne nado boyat’sya Narodnogo fronta’.43 Putin, ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2020 goda’.44 Ibid.45 Putin, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’, (2013).46 Ibid.47 Stulberg, ‘Out of gas?’.48 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘The changing role of military power in the Arctic’.49 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.50 Ruggie, ‘Multilateralism’.51 Putin, ‘Voyennaya doktrina’; Konyshev, et al., ‘Russia’s Arctic strategies in the context of the Ukrainian crisis’.52 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina’.53 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina do 2020 goda’.54 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.55 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2015).56 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.57 Putin, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’.58 Putin, ‘Zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valday»’.59 Balton, ‘Can the US and Russia Return to Co-operation in the Arctic?’.60 Østhagen, Coast guards and ocean politics in the Arctic.61 Byers, ‘Crises and international cooperation’.62 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.63 Bertelsen, ‘The Arctic as a Laboratory of Global Governance’.64 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosu kompleksnogo razvitiya Arktiki’.65 Putin, ‘Pryamaya liniya s Putinym’.66 Putin, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Niinistö’.67 Putin, ‘Plenarnoye zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo arkticheskogo foruma’.68 Medvedev, ‘Medvedev provel zasedaniye’.69 Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, ‘Press Statement’.70 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya protiv smeshivaniya ponyatiy klimata i bezopasnosti’.71 Putin, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’; ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2035 goda’.72 Ibid.73 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2021).74 Ibid.75 Putin, ‘Obrashcheniye Prezidenta’.76 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’.77 Young, ‘Can the Arctic Council Survive the Impact of the Ukraine Crisis?’.78 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosam razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony’.79 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Morskoy doktriny’.80 Lipunov and Devyatkin, ‘The Arctic in the 2023 Russian Foreign Policy Concept’; Putin, ‘Vneseny izmeneniya v Osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’.81 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).82 Lackenbauer and Dean, ‘Arctic exceptionalisms’.83 Bertelsen, ‘Arctic security in international security’; Huebert, ‘A new Cold War in the Arctic?!’; Olesen, ‘The end of Arctic exceptionalism?’.84 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.85 Putin, ‘Sammit ODKB’.86 Wilhelmsen and Hjermann, ‘Russian Certainty of NATO Hostility’.87 Arctic Council, ‘13th Arctic Council meeting’.88 Landriault and Minard, ‘The Arctic Barometer’.89 Arctic.ru, ‘UN CLCS approves Russia’s Arctic seabed submission’.90 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).91 Corbeau and Rivota, ‘Why Under-the-Radar Russian LNG Exports Matter’.92 Devyatkin, ‘Can Cooperation be Restored?’; Rosen, ‘Despite Russia’s post-invasion isolation, some narrow openings for Arctic cooperation remain’.93 Enomoto, ‘Keeping ahead of Arctic science in difficult times’.94 See for example, an Arctic climate change and permafrost conference in Yakutsk in 2023 that hosted scientists from the US and Russia, as well as the National Science Foundation-sponsored conference on the nexus of environmental degradation and security in Washington in 2022 that hosted scientists and officials from the US, Canada, Sweden, Russia, and Finland.Arctic Council ‘Climate Change and Permafrost Thawing Conference in Yakutsk’; Parlato et al., ‘Report from the USC-NSF Arctic Security Conference’.95 Young, Yang, and Zagorski, ‘The New Arctic as a Zone of Peaceful Competition’.96 Kobzeva, ‘The Need for New Arctic Exceptionalism?’; Shvets and Hossain, ‘The Future of Arctic Governance’.97 Zellen, ‘Tribe-state collaboration and the future of arctic cooperation’.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the No relevant funding.","PeriodicalId":92151,"journal":{"name":"The polar journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The polar journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896x.2023.2258658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTArctic cooperation is increasingly being questioned in the wake of Russia’s 2022 military actions in Ukraine. Accordingly, many international scholars have declared the narrative of ‘Arctic exceptionalism’ dead or corrupted. Through an analysis of political rhetoric, this paper re-evaluates the construction of Arctic exceptionalism, popularly connected to Mikhail Gorbachev’s 1987 Murmansk speech calling for an Arctic ‘zone of peace’. It is argued that a full picture of this narrative is incomplete without consideration of the developments in Arctic cooperation and conflict in the context of Dmitry Medvedev’s modernisation and multilateralism initiatives as well as Vladimir Putin’s enduring commitment to a defensive and nationalistic foreign policy. Moreover, Medvedev and Putin diverged from Gorbachev’s Arctic exceptionalism due to disparate ideologies and views on militarisation, as well as the global context of interstate mistrust. These insights allow for a new understanding of the dilemma of cooperation and conflict in the Arctic, a microcosm of the Russia-West relationship.KEYWORDS: ArcticRussiainternational relationsforeign policycooperationsecurity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’; Kornhuber et al., ‘The Disruption of Arctic Exceptionalism’.2 Smith, ‘Melting the Myth of Arctic Exceptionalism’; Melchiorre, “The Illusion of the Arctic‘Exceptionalism’”.3 Mikkola, Paukkunen and Toveri, ‘Russian Aggression and the European Arctic’.4 Finlayson, ‘From Beliefs to Arguments’.5 Osherenko and Young, The Age of the Arctic, 5–12.6 Gorbachev, ‘Speech in Murmansk’.7 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.8 Purver, ‘Arctic Security’.9 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.10 Sergunin and Konyshev, Russia in the Arctic, 41.11 Laruelle, Russia’s Arctic Strategies, 3–5; MFA Russia, ‘O Proyekte Osnov Gosudarstvennoy Politiki V Arktike’; “Shtyrov, ‘Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v otnoshenii severnykh territoriy’.12 Dodds and Rowe, ‘Red Arctic?’.13 Pabst, Medvedev’s ‘Third Way’”.14 Tsygankov, Russia’s foreign policy, xxix.15 Hahn, ‘Medvedev, Putin, and Perestroika 2.0’; Aron, ‘Putin’s Agenda and Medvedev’s Dilemma’.16 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.17 Medvedev, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’.18 Medvedev, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’; ‘Rossiya, vperod!’.19 Flenley, ‘The partnership for modernisation’.20 Dodds, ‘The Ilulissat Declaration’.21 Medvedev, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki’.22 Medvedev, ‘Zasedaniye Soveta Bezopasnosti’.23 Medvedev, ‘Nachalo zasedaniya Soveta Bezopasnosti’.24 Medvedev, ‘Dogovor s Norvegiyey o razgranichenii morskikh prostranstv’.; “V Kopengagene sostoyalis’ rossiysko datskiye peregovory”; ‘Rossiysko finlyandskiye peregovory’.25 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam i gostyam Pervogo Murmanskogo mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma’.26 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii – Severnym morskim putom’.27 Medvedev, ‘Chilingarov naznachen spetsial’nym predstavitelem po mezhdunarodnomu sotrudnichestvu v Arktike i Antarktike’.28 Heininen, et al., ‘Russian strategies in the Arctic’.29 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.30 Lukyanov, ‘Rethinking Security in “Greater Europe”’31 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.32 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.33 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.34 Trenin, and Baev, ‘The Arctic’.35 Medvedev, ‘Rossiya ostayotsya otkrytoy i gotovoy k ravnopravnomu sotrudnichestvu’.36 Kydd, ‘Trust, reassurance, and cooperation’.37 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic?’.38 Wilson Rowe and Blakkisrud, ‘A new kind of Arctic Power?’.39 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya s “ser’yeznym napryazheniyem” sledit za aktivnost’yu NATO v Arktike’.40 Petrov, ‘Putin nadel na belogo medvedya sputnikovyy peredatchik’.41 Putin, ‘Rechi Putina i Shoygu na I Mezhdunarodnom arkticheskom forume’.42 Putin, ‘Ne nado boyat’sya Narodnogo fronta’.43 Putin, ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2020 goda’.44 Ibid.45 Putin, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’, (2013).46 Ibid.47 Stulberg, ‘Out of gas?’.48 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘The changing role of military power in the Arctic’.49 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.50 Ruggie, ‘Multilateralism’.51 Putin, ‘Voyennaya doktrina’; Konyshev, et al., ‘Russia’s Arctic strategies in the context of the Ukrainian crisis’.52 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina’.53 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina do 2020 goda’.54 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.55 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2015).56 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.57 Putin, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’.58 Putin, ‘Zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valday»’.59 Balton, ‘Can the US and Russia Return to Co-operation in the Arctic?’.60 Østhagen, Coast guards and ocean politics in the Arctic.61 Byers, ‘Crises and international cooperation’.62 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.63 Bertelsen, ‘The Arctic as a Laboratory of Global Governance’.64 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosu kompleksnogo razvitiya Arktiki’.65 Putin, ‘Pryamaya liniya s Putinym’.66 Putin, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Niinistö’.67 Putin, ‘Plenarnoye zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo arkticheskogo foruma’.68 Medvedev, ‘Medvedev provel zasedaniye’.69 Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, ‘Press Statement’.70 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya protiv smeshivaniya ponyatiy klimata i bezopasnosti’.71 Putin, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’; ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2035 goda’.72 Ibid.73 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2021).74 Ibid.75 Putin, ‘Obrashcheniye Prezidenta’.76 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’.77 Young, ‘Can the Arctic Council Survive the Impact of the Ukraine Crisis?’.78 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosam razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony’.79 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Morskoy doktriny’.80 Lipunov and Devyatkin, ‘The Arctic in the 2023 Russian Foreign Policy Concept’; Putin, ‘Vneseny izmeneniya v Osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’.81 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).82 Lackenbauer and Dean, ‘Arctic exceptionalisms’.83 Bertelsen, ‘Arctic security in international security’; Huebert, ‘A new Cold War in the Arctic?!’; Olesen, ‘The end of Arctic exceptionalism?’.84 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.85 Putin, ‘Sammit ODKB’.86 Wilhelmsen and Hjermann, ‘Russian Certainty of NATO Hostility’.87 Arctic Council, ‘13th Arctic Council meeting’.88 Landriault and Minard, ‘The Arctic Barometer’.89 Arctic.ru, ‘UN CLCS approves Russia’s Arctic seabed submission’.90 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).91 Corbeau and Rivota, ‘Why Under-the-Radar Russian LNG Exports Matter’.92 Devyatkin, ‘Can Cooperation be Restored?’; Rosen, ‘Despite Russia’s post-invasion isolation, some narrow openings for Arctic cooperation remain’.93 Enomoto, ‘Keeping ahead of Arctic science in difficult times’.94 See for example, an Arctic climate change and permafrost conference in Yakutsk in 2023 that hosted scientists from the US and Russia, as well as the National Science Foundation-sponsored conference on the nexus of environmental degradation and security in Washington in 2022 that hosted scientists and officials from the US, Canada, Sweden, Russia, and Finland.Arctic Council ‘Climate Change and Permafrost Thawing Conference in Yakutsk’; Parlato et al., ‘Report from the USC-NSF Arctic Security Conference’.95 Young, Yang, and Zagorski, ‘The New Arctic as a Zone of Peaceful Competition’.96 Kobzeva, ‘The Need for New Arctic Exceptionalism?’; Shvets and Hossain, ‘The Future of Arctic Governance’.97 Zellen, ‘Tribe-state collaboration and the future of arctic cooperation’.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the No relevant funding.
北极例外论:从戈尔巴乔夫到梅德韦杰夫和普京的合作与冲突的叙述
随着俄罗斯2022年在乌克兰的军事行动,北极合作越来越受到质疑。因此,许多国际学者宣称“北极例外论”的说法已经死亡或腐化。通过对政治修辞的分析,本文重新评估了北极例外论的构建,这种建构通常与米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫1987年在摩尔曼斯克发表的呼吁北极“和平区”的演讲有关。有人认为,如果不考虑在德米特里·梅德韦杰夫的现代化和多边主义倡议以及弗拉基米尔·普京对防御性和民族主义外交政策的持久承诺的背景下,北极合作和冲突的发展,这种叙述的全貌是不完整的。此外,由于不同的意识形态和对军事化的看法,以及国家间不信任的全球背景,梅德韦杰夫和普京偏离了戈尔巴乔夫的北极例外论。这些见解使人们对北极地区的合作与冲突的困境有了新的认识,北极是俄罗斯与西方关系的一个缩影。关键词:北极俄罗斯国际关系外交政策合作安全披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 Koivurova and Shibata,《2022年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后》;Kornhuber等人,“北极例外论的瓦解”史密斯,《融化北极例外主义的神话》;《北极“例外论”的幻觉》Mikkola, Paukkunen和Toveri,“俄罗斯侵略和欧洲北极”芬莱森,《从信念到论证》Osherenko和Young,北极时代,5-12.6戈尔巴乔夫,“在摩尔曼斯克的演讲”。7 Åtland,“米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫,摩尔曼斯克倡议”珀弗,《北极安全》,第9页Devyatkin, < Environmental dasten >,第10页Sergunin and Konyshev,《俄罗斯在北极》,41.11 Laruelle,《俄罗斯的北极战略》,3-5;俄罗斯外交部,“O Proyekte Osnov Gosudarstvennoy Politiki V Arktike”;“Shtyrov,‘Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v otnoshenii severnykh领土’。多德和罗,《红色北极》,13页帕布斯特,梅德韦杰夫的“第三条道路”Tsygankov,俄罗斯外交政策,2009年哈恩,《梅德韦杰夫、普京和改革2.0》;阿隆,《普京的议程和梅德韦杰夫的困境》16《悲伤的妄想》,Sakwa著梅德维杰夫,< Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki >梅德韦杰夫,“波斯拉尼耶联邦”nomu Sobraniyu;“俄罗斯,vperod !”.19弗伦利,《现代化的伙伴关系》,第20页多德,《伊卢利萨特宣言》,第21页梅德韦杰夫,< Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki >,第22页梅德韦杰夫,' Zasedaniye Soveta Bezopasnosti ' .23梅德韦杰夫,' Nachalo zasedaniya Soveta Bezopasnosti ' .24梅德韦杰夫(Medvedev),“总理是挪威的总理”;“V Kopengagene sostoyalis’rossiysko datskiye perevgovory”;“罗西斯科终于和斯基耶·佩戈罗夫”梅德韦杰夫,<私人资本主义在摩尔曼斯克的发展>,《经济论坛》第26期梅德韦杰夫,<私营企业的发展前景>,《俄罗斯经济》,第27页梅德韦杰夫,“奇林加罗夫naznachen特别”nym preprestavitelem po mezhdunarodnomu sotrudnichestvu v arklike i antarklike”,28Heininen等人,《俄罗斯在北极的战略》,第29页梅德韦杰夫,《斯托尔滕贝格的新闻发布会》,30页Lukyanov, '重新思考安全在“大欧洲”' 31 Åtland, '米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫,摩尔曼斯克倡议' .32《悲伤的妄想》,第33页梅德韦杰夫,<新闻发布会的斯托尔滕贝格姆>,第34页特列宁和巴耶夫,《北极》,第35页梅德韦杰夫,' Rossiya ostayotsya otkrytoy i gotovoy k ravnopravnomu sotrudnichestvu ' .36基德,《信任、保证和合作》,第37页《俄罗斯是北极地区的修正主义军事大国吗?》38威尔逊·罗和布莱克斯鲁德,《一种新型的北极大国?》,第39页俄新社报道,俄罗斯的“总统”叶利钦·纳普里亚泽尼耶姆(俄罗斯总统)的“总统”普京(俄罗斯总统)的“总统”普京(俄罗斯总统)的“总统”普京(俄罗斯总统)的“总统”普京(俄罗斯总统)的“总统”普京(俄罗斯总统)的“总统”普京(俄罗斯总统)彼得罗夫,“普京naddel na belogo medvedya sputnikovy peredatchik”41普京,《俄罗斯总统普京与俄罗斯经济论坛》,第42页43 .普京,《新时代的国家》普京,《2020年俄罗斯战略战略》,第44页同上45普京:《Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki》(2013).46同上47 Stulberg,“没油了?Konyshev and Sergunin, <北极地区军事力量角色的变化>,第49期Käpylä和Mikkola,《当代北极与世界政治》,50页建.51“多边主义”普京(voenaya doktrina);Konyshev等人,“乌克兰危机背景下俄罗斯的北极战略”,第52页普京,< Morskaya doktrina >,第53页普京,《Morskaya doktrina do 2020 goda》,54页普京,< Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki >, 55普京:《国家战略与经济发展》,(2015):56普京,< Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki >,第57页普京,《波斯拉尼耶联邦的nomu Sobraniyu》58普京,' Zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba«Valday»' .59Balton,“美国和俄罗斯能在北极恢复合作吗?”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信