{"title":"Arctic exceptionalism: a narrative of cooperation and conflict from Gorbachev to Medvedev and Putin","authors":"Pavel Devyatkin","doi":"10.1080/2154896x.2023.2258658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTArctic cooperation is increasingly being questioned in the wake of Russia’s 2022 military actions in Ukraine. Accordingly, many international scholars have declared the narrative of ‘Arctic exceptionalism’ dead or corrupted. Through an analysis of political rhetoric, this paper re-evaluates the construction of Arctic exceptionalism, popularly connected to Mikhail Gorbachev’s 1987 Murmansk speech calling for an Arctic ‘zone of peace’. It is argued that a full picture of this narrative is incomplete without consideration of the developments in Arctic cooperation and conflict in the context of Dmitry Medvedev’s modernisation and multilateralism initiatives as well as Vladimir Putin’s enduring commitment to a defensive and nationalistic foreign policy. Moreover, Medvedev and Putin diverged from Gorbachev’s Arctic exceptionalism due to disparate ideologies and views on militarisation, as well as the global context of interstate mistrust. These insights allow for a new understanding of the dilemma of cooperation and conflict in the Arctic, a microcosm of the Russia-West relationship.KEYWORDS: ArcticRussiainternational relationsforeign policycooperationsecurity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’; Kornhuber et al., ‘The Disruption of Arctic Exceptionalism’.2 Smith, ‘Melting the Myth of Arctic Exceptionalism’; Melchiorre, “The Illusion of the Arctic‘Exceptionalism’”.3 Mikkola, Paukkunen and Toveri, ‘Russian Aggression and the European Arctic’.4 Finlayson, ‘From Beliefs to Arguments’.5 Osherenko and Young, The Age of the Arctic, 5–12.6 Gorbachev, ‘Speech in Murmansk’.7 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.8 Purver, ‘Arctic Security’.9 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.10 Sergunin and Konyshev, Russia in the Arctic, 41.11 Laruelle, Russia’s Arctic Strategies, 3–5; MFA Russia, ‘O Proyekte Osnov Gosudarstvennoy Politiki V Arktike’; “Shtyrov, ‘Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v otnoshenii severnykh territoriy’.12 Dodds and Rowe, ‘Red Arctic?’.13 Pabst, Medvedev’s ‘Third Way’”.14 Tsygankov, Russia’s foreign policy, xxix.15 Hahn, ‘Medvedev, Putin, and Perestroika 2.0’; Aron, ‘Putin’s Agenda and Medvedev’s Dilemma’.16 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.17 Medvedev, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’.18 Medvedev, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’; ‘Rossiya, vperod!’.19 Flenley, ‘The partnership for modernisation’.20 Dodds, ‘The Ilulissat Declaration’.21 Medvedev, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki’.22 Medvedev, ‘Zasedaniye Soveta Bezopasnosti’.23 Medvedev, ‘Nachalo zasedaniya Soveta Bezopasnosti’.24 Medvedev, ‘Dogovor s Norvegiyey o razgranichenii morskikh prostranstv’.; “V Kopengagene sostoyalis’ rossiysko datskiye peregovory”; ‘Rossiysko finlyandskiye peregovory’.25 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam i gostyam Pervogo Murmanskogo mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma’.26 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii – Severnym morskim putom’.27 Medvedev, ‘Chilingarov naznachen spetsial’nym predstavitelem po mezhdunarodnomu sotrudnichestvu v Arktike i Antarktike’.28 Heininen, et al., ‘Russian strategies in the Arctic’.29 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.30 Lukyanov, ‘Rethinking Security in “Greater Europe”’31 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.32 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.33 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.34 Trenin, and Baev, ‘The Arctic’.35 Medvedev, ‘Rossiya ostayotsya otkrytoy i gotovoy k ravnopravnomu sotrudnichestvu’.36 Kydd, ‘Trust, reassurance, and cooperation’.37 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic?’.38 Wilson Rowe and Blakkisrud, ‘A new kind of Arctic Power?’.39 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya s “ser’yeznym napryazheniyem” sledit za aktivnost’yu NATO v Arktike’.40 Petrov, ‘Putin nadel na belogo medvedya sputnikovyy peredatchik’.41 Putin, ‘Rechi Putina i Shoygu na I Mezhdunarodnom arkticheskom forume’.42 Putin, ‘Ne nado boyat’sya Narodnogo fronta’.43 Putin, ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2020 goda’.44 Ibid.45 Putin, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’, (2013).46 Ibid.47 Stulberg, ‘Out of gas?’.48 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘The changing role of military power in the Arctic’.49 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.50 Ruggie, ‘Multilateralism’.51 Putin, ‘Voyennaya doktrina’; Konyshev, et al., ‘Russia’s Arctic strategies in the context of the Ukrainian crisis’.52 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina’.53 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina do 2020 goda’.54 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.55 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2015).56 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.57 Putin, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’.58 Putin, ‘Zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valday»’.59 Balton, ‘Can the US and Russia Return to Co-operation in the Arctic?’.60 Østhagen, Coast guards and ocean politics in the Arctic.61 Byers, ‘Crises and international cooperation’.62 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.63 Bertelsen, ‘The Arctic as a Laboratory of Global Governance’.64 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosu kompleksnogo razvitiya Arktiki’.65 Putin, ‘Pryamaya liniya s Putinym’.66 Putin, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Niinistö’.67 Putin, ‘Plenarnoye zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo arkticheskogo foruma’.68 Medvedev, ‘Medvedev provel zasedaniye’.69 Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, ‘Press Statement’.70 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya protiv smeshivaniya ponyatiy klimata i bezopasnosti’.71 Putin, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’; ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2035 goda’.72 Ibid.73 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2021).74 Ibid.75 Putin, ‘Obrashcheniye Prezidenta’.76 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’.77 Young, ‘Can the Arctic Council Survive the Impact of the Ukraine Crisis?’.78 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosam razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony’.79 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Morskoy doktriny’.80 Lipunov and Devyatkin, ‘The Arctic in the 2023 Russian Foreign Policy Concept’; Putin, ‘Vneseny izmeneniya v Osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’.81 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).82 Lackenbauer and Dean, ‘Arctic exceptionalisms’.83 Bertelsen, ‘Arctic security in international security’; Huebert, ‘A new Cold War in the Arctic?!’; Olesen, ‘The end of Arctic exceptionalism?’.84 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.85 Putin, ‘Sammit ODKB’.86 Wilhelmsen and Hjermann, ‘Russian Certainty of NATO Hostility’.87 Arctic Council, ‘13th Arctic Council meeting’.88 Landriault and Minard, ‘The Arctic Barometer’.89 Arctic.ru, ‘UN CLCS approves Russia’s Arctic seabed submission’.90 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).91 Corbeau and Rivota, ‘Why Under-the-Radar Russian LNG Exports Matter’.92 Devyatkin, ‘Can Cooperation be Restored?’; Rosen, ‘Despite Russia’s post-invasion isolation, some narrow openings for Arctic cooperation remain’.93 Enomoto, ‘Keeping ahead of Arctic science in difficult times’.94 See for example, an Arctic climate change and permafrost conference in Yakutsk in 2023 that hosted scientists from the US and Russia, as well as the National Science Foundation-sponsored conference on the nexus of environmental degradation and security in Washington in 2022 that hosted scientists and officials from the US, Canada, Sweden, Russia, and Finland.Arctic Council ‘Climate Change and Permafrost Thawing Conference in Yakutsk’; Parlato et al., ‘Report from the USC-NSF Arctic Security Conference’.95 Young, Yang, and Zagorski, ‘The New Arctic as a Zone of Peaceful Competition’.96 Kobzeva, ‘The Need for New Arctic Exceptionalism?’; Shvets and Hossain, ‘The Future of Arctic Governance’.97 Zellen, ‘Tribe-state collaboration and the future of arctic cooperation’.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the No relevant funding.","PeriodicalId":92151,"journal":{"name":"The polar journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The polar journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896x.2023.2258658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTArctic cooperation is increasingly being questioned in the wake of Russia’s 2022 military actions in Ukraine. Accordingly, many international scholars have declared the narrative of ‘Arctic exceptionalism’ dead or corrupted. Through an analysis of political rhetoric, this paper re-evaluates the construction of Arctic exceptionalism, popularly connected to Mikhail Gorbachev’s 1987 Murmansk speech calling for an Arctic ‘zone of peace’. It is argued that a full picture of this narrative is incomplete without consideration of the developments in Arctic cooperation and conflict in the context of Dmitry Medvedev’s modernisation and multilateralism initiatives as well as Vladimir Putin’s enduring commitment to a defensive and nationalistic foreign policy. Moreover, Medvedev and Putin diverged from Gorbachev’s Arctic exceptionalism due to disparate ideologies and views on militarisation, as well as the global context of interstate mistrust. These insights allow for a new understanding of the dilemma of cooperation and conflict in the Arctic, a microcosm of the Russia-West relationship.KEYWORDS: ArcticRussiainternational relationsforeign policycooperationsecurity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’; Kornhuber et al., ‘The Disruption of Arctic Exceptionalism’.2 Smith, ‘Melting the Myth of Arctic Exceptionalism’; Melchiorre, “The Illusion of the Arctic‘Exceptionalism’”.3 Mikkola, Paukkunen and Toveri, ‘Russian Aggression and the European Arctic’.4 Finlayson, ‘From Beliefs to Arguments’.5 Osherenko and Young, The Age of the Arctic, 5–12.6 Gorbachev, ‘Speech in Murmansk’.7 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.8 Purver, ‘Arctic Security’.9 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.10 Sergunin and Konyshev, Russia in the Arctic, 41.11 Laruelle, Russia’s Arctic Strategies, 3–5; MFA Russia, ‘O Proyekte Osnov Gosudarstvennoy Politiki V Arktike’; “Shtyrov, ‘Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v otnoshenii severnykh territoriy’.12 Dodds and Rowe, ‘Red Arctic?’.13 Pabst, Medvedev’s ‘Third Way’”.14 Tsygankov, Russia’s foreign policy, xxix.15 Hahn, ‘Medvedev, Putin, and Perestroika 2.0’; Aron, ‘Putin’s Agenda and Medvedev’s Dilemma’.16 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.17 Medvedev, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’.18 Medvedev, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’; ‘Rossiya, vperod!’.19 Flenley, ‘The partnership for modernisation’.20 Dodds, ‘The Ilulissat Declaration’.21 Medvedev, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki’.22 Medvedev, ‘Zasedaniye Soveta Bezopasnosti’.23 Medvedev, ‘Nachalo zasedaniya Soveta Bezopasnosti’.24 Medvedev, ‘Dogovor s Norvegiyey o razgranichenii morskikh prostranstv’.; “V Kopengagene sostoyalis’ rossiysko datskiye peregovory”; ‘Rossiysko finlyandskiye peregovory’.25 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam i gostyam Pervogo Murmanskogo mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma’.26 Medvedev, ‘Privetstviye uchastnikam mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii – Severnym morskim putom’.27 Medvedev, ‘Chilingarov naznachen spetsial’nym predstavitelem po mezhdunarodnomu sotrudnichestvu v Arktike i Antarktike’.28 Heininen, et al., ‘Russian strategies in the Arctic’.29 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.30 Lukyanov, ‘Rethinking Security in “Greater Europe”’31 Åtland, ‘Mikhail Gorbachev, the Murmansk initiative’.32 Sakwa, ‘Sad delusions’.33 Medvedev, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Stoltenbergom’.34 Trenin, and Baev, ‘The Arctic’.35 Medvedev, ‘Rossiya ostayotsya otkrytoy i gotovoy k ravnopravnomu sotrudnichestvu’.36 Kydd, ‘Trust, reassurance, and cooperation’.37 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic?’.38 Wilson Rowe and Blakkisrud, ‘A new kind of Arctic Power?’.39 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya s “ser’yeznym napryazheniyem” sledit za aktivnost’yu NATO v Arktike’.40 Petrov, ‘Putin nadel na belogo medvedya sputnikovyy peredatchik’.41 Putin, ‘Rechi Putina i Shoygu na I Mezhdunarodnom arkticheskom forume’.42 Putin, ‘Ne nado boyat’sya Narodnogo fronta’.43 Putin, ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2020 goda’.44 Ibid.45 Putin, ‘Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki’, (2013).46 Ibid.47 Stulberg, ‘Out of gas?’.48 Konyshev and Sergunin, ‘The changing role of military power in the Arctic’.49 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.50 Ruggie, ‘Multilateralism’.51 Putin, ‘Voyennaya doktrina’; Konyshev, et al., ‘Russia’s Arctic strategies in the context of the Ukrainian crisis’.52 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina’.53 Putin, ‘Morskaya doktrina do 2020 goda’.54 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.55 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2015).56 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’.57 Putin, ‘Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu’.58 Putin, ‘Zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valday»’.59 Balton, ‘Can the US and Russia Return to Co-operation in the Arctic?’.60 Østhagen, Coast guards and ocean politics in the Arctic.61 Byers, ‘Crises and international cooperation’.62 Devyatkin, ‘Environmental Détente’.63 Bertelsen, ‘The Arctic as a Laboratory of Global Governance’.64 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosu kompleksnogo razvitiya Arktiki’.65 Putin, ‘Pryamaya liniya s Putinym’.66 Putin, ‘Press-konferentsiya s Niinistö’.67 Putin, ‘Plenarnoye zasedaniye Mezhdunarodnogo arkticheskogo foruma’.68 Medvedev, ‘Medvedev provel zasedaniye’.69 Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, ‘Press Statement’.70 RIA Novosti, ‘Rossiya protiv smeshivaniya ponyatiy klimata i bezopasnosti’.71 Putin, ‘Ob Osnovakh gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’; ‘O Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony do 2035 goda’.72 Ibid.73 Putin, ‘O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti’, (2021).74 Ibid.75 Putin, ‘Obrashcheniye Prezidenta’.76 Koivurova and Shibata, ‘After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022’.77 Young, ‘Can the Arctic Council Survive the Impact of the Ukraine Crisis?’.78 Putin, ‘Soveshchaniye po voprosam razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony’.79 Putin, ‘Ob utverzhdenii Morskoy doktriny’.80 Lipunov and Devyatkin, ‘The Arctic in the 2023 Russian Foreign Policy Concept’; Putin, ‘Vneseny izmeneniya v Osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki v Arktike’.81 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).82 Lackenbauer and Dean, ‘Arctic exceptionalisms’.83 Bertelsen, ‘Arctic security in international security’; Huebert, ‘A new Cold War in the Arctic?!’; Olesen, ‘The end of Arctic exceptionalism?’.84 Käpylä and Mikkola, ‘Contemporary Arctic meets world politics’.85 Putin, ‘Sammit ODKB’.86 Wilhelmsen and Hjermann, ‘Russian Certainty of NATO Hostility’.87 Arctic Council, ‘13th Arctic Council meeting’.88 Landriault and Minard, ‘The Arctic Barometer’.89 Arctic.ru, ‘UN CLCS approves Russia’s Arctic seabed submission’.90 Putin, ‘Kontseptsii vneshney politiki’, (2023).91 Corbeau and Rivota, ‘Why Under-the-Radar Russian LNG Exports Matter’.92 Devyatkin, ‘Can Cooperation be Restored?’; Rosen, ‘Despite Russia’s post-invasion isolation, some narrow openings for Arctic cooperation remain’.93 Enomoto, ‘Keeping ahead of Arctic science in difficult times’.94 See for example, an Arctic climate change and permafrost conference in Yakutsk in 2023 that hosted scientists from the US and Russia, as well as the National Science Foundation-sponsored conference on the nexus of environmental degradation and security in Washington in 2022 that hosted scientists and officials from the US, Canada, Sweden, Russia, and Finland.Arctic Council ‘Climate Change and Permafrost Thawing Conference in Yakutsk’; Parlato et al., ‘Report from the USC-NSF Arctic Security Conference’.95 Young, Yang, and Zagorski, ‘The New Arctic as a Zone of Peaceful Competition’.96 Kobzeva, ‘The Need for New Arctic Exceptionalism?’; Shvets and Hossain, ‘The Future of Arctic Governance’.97 Zellen, ‘Tribe-state collaboration and the future of arctic cooperation’.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the No relevant funding.