Platelet rich plasma could replace tranexemic acid in total knee replacement? A comparative study between their postoperative- bleeding hemostatic effects

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Mahmoud Fahmy, Ebeed Yasin
{"title":"Platelet rich plasma could replace tranexemic acid in total knee replacement? A comparative study between their postoperative- bleeding hemostatic effects","authors":"Mahmoud Fahmy, Ebeed Yasin","doi":"10.1097/bco.0000000000001238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of the study is to detect whether platelet rich plasma (PRP) is equal to tranexemic acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and compare clinical outcomes, complications, and cost effectiveness between the two groups. This is one of the first randomized, controlled trials that compare both materials in elective knee arthroplasty. Methods: 120 patients were randomized. Postoperative blood loss was determined and compared by measuring the total drainage suction together with the hemoglobin level and blood transfusion rate. Thromboembolic complications and knee society score were recorded. Results: The mean total drain output was 469 mL in the TXA group compared with 698 mL in the PRP group, with statistical significance. There were significant differences in reduction of hemoglobin level (TXA: 1.21 vs. PRP: 2.08). The rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients given TXA was higher than those given PRP, however, there were no significant differences. No transfusions were required in either group, and no significant differences were found in the length of hospital stay, pain assessment and knee society score. Conclusions: Though the blood loss was significantly bigger in the custom-made PRP group, no transfusions were required. Meanwhile, the rate of DVT in the PRP group tends to be lower than those in TXA group. We concluded that PRP was not superior to TXA in reducing perioperative blood loss, however further large-scale randomized trials are crucial to confirm these results to be added to the calling literature.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to detect whether platelet rich plasma (PRP) is equal to tranexemic acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and compare clinical outcomes, complications, and cost effectiveness between the two groups. This is one of the first randomized, controlled trials that compare both materials in elective knee arthroplasty. Methods: 120 patients were randomized. Postoperative blood loss was determined and compared by measuring the total drainage suction together with the hemoglobin level and blood transfusion rate. Thromboembolic complications and knee society score were recorded. Results: The mean total drain output was 469 mL in the TXA group compared with 698 mL in the PRP group, with statistical significance. There were significant differences in reduction of hemoglobin level (TXA: 1.21 vs. PRP: 2.08). The rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients given TXA was higher than those given PRP, however, there were no significant differences. No transfusions were required in either group, and no significant differences were found in the length of hospital stay, pain assessment and knee society score. Conclusions: Though the blood loss was significantly bigger in the custom-made PRP group, no transfusions were required. Meanwhile, the rate of DVT in the PRP group tends to be lower than those in TXA group. We concluded that PRP was not superior to TXA in reducing perioperative blood loss, however further large-scale randomized trials are crucial to confirm these results to be added to the calling literature.
全膝关节置换术中富血小板血浆是否能替代氨戊昔酸?两种方法术后出血止血效果的比较研究
背景:本研究的目的是检测富血小板血浆(PRP)与氨戊西酸(TXA)在减少全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的失血量和输血率方面是否相等,并比较两组的临床结果、并发症和成本效益。这是比较两种材料在选择性膝关节置换术中的首次随机对照试验之一。方法:随机选取120例患者。术后出血量通过测量总引流吸力、血红蛋白水平及输血率来确定并比较。记录血栓栓塞并发症及膝关节社会评分。结果:TXA组平均总排液量为469 mL, PRP组为698 mL,差异有统计学意义。两组血红蛋白水平降低差异有统计学意义(TXA: 1.21 vs. PRP: 2.08)。TXA组深静脉血栓形成(DVT)发生率高于PRP组,但差异无统计学意义。两组均不需要输血,住院时间、疼痛评估和膝关节社会评分均无显著差异。结论:虽然定制PRP组出血量明显较大,但无需输血。同时,PRP组DVT发生率较TXA组低。我们得出结论,PRP在减少围手术期失血量方面并不优于TXA,但进一步的大规模随机试验对于证实这些结果并将其添加到相关文献中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信