Exploring network content ecosystem evaluation model based on Chinese judicial discourse of digital platform

IF 2 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Le Cheng, Ming Xu, Chien-Yi Chang
{"title":"Exploring network content ecosystem evaluation model based on Chinese judicial discourse of digital platform","authors":"Le Cheng, Ming Xu, Chien-Yi Chang","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2023-2010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Constructing a green and harmonious cyberspace in a network content ecosystem is a beautiful vision for millions of netizens. This study, by establishing a self-compiled corpus of judicial discourse from digital platform typical cases in China and using a combination of corpus-based approach and case analysis method, represents the development status of the Chinese network content ecosystem in order to develop a model for understanding and evaluating a network content ecosystem. Based on the analysis results of Chinese judicial discourse, an evaluation model, namely the People, Object, Technology, Organization, Government, Environment Framework (POTOGE), is derived after examining and evaluating four conceptual frameworks of the People, Process and Technology Framework (PPT), the Technology, Organization and Environment Framework (TOE), the Real Access/Real Impact Framework (RA/RI) and the People, Technology, Organization and Environment Framework (PTOE). To some extent, the POTOGE evaluation model presents a holistic and comprehensive perspective for understanding and evaluating a network content ecosystem and its key components, which can provide a reference for testing standards to ensure the sustainable development of current and future network content ecosystems. Meanwhile, the insights obtained from this study may help deepen our understanding of the judicial discourse and its thinking in the network content ecosystem. The analysis results of typical cases on digital platform can provide a reference for the formulation of future relevant laws and regulations and improve the legal protection and prevention awareness of society.","PeriodicalId":55934,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Constructing a green and harmonious cyberspace in a network content ecosystem is a beautiful vision for millions of netizens. This study, by establishing a self-compiled corpus of judicial discourse from digital platform typical cases in China and using a combination of corpus-based approach and case analysis method, represents the development status of the Chinese network content ecosystem in order to develop a model for understanding and evaluating a network content ecosystem. Based on the analysis results of Chinese judicial discourse, an evaluation model, namely the People, Object, Technology, Organization, Government, Environment Framework (POTOGE), is derived after examining and evaluating four conceptual frameworks of the People, Process and Technology Framework (PPT), the Technology, Organization and Environment Framework (TOE), the Real Access/Real Impact Framework (RA/RI) and the People, Technology, Organization and Environment Framework (PTOE). To some extent, the POTOGE evaluation model presents a holistic and comprehensive perspective for understanding and evaluating a network content ecosystem and its key components, which can provide a reference for testing standards to ensure the sustainable development of current and future network content ecosystems. Meanwhile, the insights obtained from this study may help deepen our understanding of the judicial discourse and its thinking in the network content ecosystem. The analysis results of typical cases on digital platform can provide a reference for the formulation of future relevant laws and regulations and improve the legal protection and prevention awareness of society.
基于数字平台中国司法话语的网络内容生态系统评价模型探索
在网络内容生态系统中构建绿色和谐的网络空间,是广大网民的美好愿景。本研究通过建立自编的中国数字平台典型案例司法话语语料库,采用基于语料库的方法和案例分析法相结合的方法,代表中国网络内容生态系统的发展现状,以期建立一个理解和评价网络内容生态系统的模型。在中国司法话语分析结果的基础上,通过对人、过程、技术、组织、政府、环境框架(PPT)、技术、组织、环境框架(TOE)、真实获取/真实影响框架(RA/RI)和人、技术、组织、环境框架(PTOE)四个概念框架进行考察和评价,得出了人、对象、技术、组织、政府、环境框架(POTOGE)的评价模型。在一定程度上,POTOGE评价模型为理解和评价网络内容生态系统及其关键组成部分提供了一个整体和全面的视角,可以为测试标准提供参考,以确保当前和未来网络内容生态系统的可持续发展。同时,本研究获得的见解有助于加深我们对网络内容生态系统中的司法话语及其思维的理解。通过对数字平台典型案例的分析结果,可以为未来相关法律法规的制定提供参考,提高社会的法律保护和预防意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
80.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信