Breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices of mothers exposed to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in Limpopo Province

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
XG Mbhenyane, TC Mandiwana, HV Mbhatsani, NS Mabapa, LF Mushaphi, BA Tambe
{"title":"Breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices of mothers exposed to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in Limpopo Province","authors":"XG Mbhenyane, TC Mandiwana, HV Mbhatsani, NS Mabapa, LF Mushaphi, BA Tambe","doi":"10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i2.1917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Appropriate infant feeding is crucial for growth and development of children in the first 5 years of their life. Despite theimplementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI), now known as Mother-Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, exclusivebreastfeeding and complementary feeding practices remain barriers to optimal breastfeeding practices in South Africa.Objectives. To explore the impact of the BFHI on breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices of mothers for second or subsequent pregnancies.Methods. The study design was a cross-sectional survey and included 169 mother-baby pairs conveniently selected from clinics inLimpopo Province. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire and analysed for 157 complete data sets using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences version 26.0. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the impact of baby-friendly hospitals on breastfeeding practices of mothers.Results. Few mothers in both groups practised exclusive breastfeeding for the recommended time (BFHI 22.2%; non- BFHI 30.6%). Themain reasons for introducing early complementary foods were that the child was hungry, crying or was not satisfied with breastmilk.Mothers in the BFHI group were three times (odds ratio (OR) 3.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 - 10.98) more likely to breastfeedtheir infants, and two times (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.08 - 4.58) more likely to initiate their infants on water with added glucose or salt beforethe age of 6 months than mothers in the non-BFHI group.Conclusion. Mothers from the non-baby-friendly group had better breastfeeding practices. Evidence showed that for second or subsequent pregnancies, exposure to a baby-friendly facility during first pregnancy did not sustain appropriate breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices. Whether mothers were exposed or not, practices were similar. Strengthening and continual evaluation of breastfeeding interventions might improve impact on child survival outcomes in the study area.","PeriodicalId":44732,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Child Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajch.2023.v17i2.1917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Appropriate infant feeding is crucial for growth and development of children in the first 5 years of their life. Despite theimplementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI), now known as Mother-Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, exclusivebreastfeeding and complementary feeding practices remain barriers to optimal breastfeeding practices in South Africa.Objectives. To explore the impact of the BFHI on breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices of mothers for second or subsequent pregnancies.Methods. The study design was a cross-sectional survey and included 169 mother-baby pairs conveniently selected from clinics inLimpopo Province. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire and analysed for 157 complete data sets using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences version 26.0. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the impact of baby-friendly hospitals on breastfeeding practices of mothers.Results. Few mothers in both groups practised exclusive breastfeeding for the recommended time (BFHI 22.2%; non- BFHI 30.6%). Themain reasons for introducing early complementary foods were that the child was hungry, crying or was not satisfied with breastmilk.Mothers in the BFHI group were three times (odds ratio (OR) 3.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 - 10.98) more likely to breastfeedtheir infants, and two times (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.08 - 4.58) more likely to initiate their infants on water with added glucose or salt beforethe age of 6 months than mothers in the non-BFHI group.Conclusion. Mothers from the non-baby-friendly group had better breastfeeding practices. Evidence showed that for second or subsequent pregnancies, exposure to a baby-friendly facility during first pregnancy did not sustain appropriate breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices. Whether mothers were exposed or not, practices were similar. Strengthening and continual evaluation of breastfeeding interventions might improve impact on child survival outcomes in the study area.
参加林波波省爱婴医院倡议的母亲的母乳喂养和补充喂养做法
背景。适当的婴儿喂养对儿童生命最初5年的生长发育至关重要。尽管实施了爱婴医院倡议(BFHI),现在被称为爱婴医院倡议,但在南非,纯母乳喂养和补充喂养做法仍然是实现最佳母乳喂养做法的障碍。目的:探讨BFHI对二胎及以后妊娠母亲母乳喂养和补充喂养方式的影响。研究设计为横断面调查,包括从林波波省诊所方便选择的169对母婴。使用有效的问卷收集数据,并使用社会科学统计软件包26.0版对157个完整数据集进行分析。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析来检验爱婴医院对母亲母乳喂养行为的影响。两组中很少有母亲按照推荐时间进行纯母乳喂养(BFHI 22.2%;非BFHI 30.6%)。早期引入辅食的主要原因是孩子饿了、哭了或对母乳不满意。BFHI组母亲为3倍(优势比(OR) 3.53;95%可信区间(CI) 1.13 - 10.98)更可能母乳喂养婴儿,两次(OR 2.22;(95% CI 1.08 - 4.58)比非bfhi组的母亲更有可能在6个月前开始给婴儿添加葡萄糖或盐的水。非爱婴组的母亲有更好的母乳喂养习惯。有证据表明,对于第二次或以后的怀孕,在第一次怀孕期间接触婴儿友好型设施不能维持适当的母乳喂养和补充喂养做法。无论母亲是否受到感染,做法都是相似的。加强和持续评估母乳喂养干预措施可能会改善对研究地区儿童生存结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信