Schoolteachers in Out-of-School Hours Education: Blurring Professional Ideology in Recent Times

M. Monjurul Islam, Mohammed Shamsul Hoque, Wan Mazlini Binti Othman, Saraswathy Thurairaj, Ghadah Al Murshidi, Latha Ravindran
{"title":"Schoolteachers in Out-of-School Hours Education: Blurring Professional Ideology in Recent Times","authors":"M. Monjurul Islam, Mohammed Shamsul Hoque, Wan Mazlini Binti Othman, Saraswathy Thurairaj, Ghadah Al Murshidi, Latha Ravindran","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ professional ideology and their involvement in out-of-school hours (OoSH) practices have been questioned in recent times. This study explores how schoolteachers understand their professional ideology in relation to their OoSH practices and how they explain their participation in private tutoring in addition to formal schooling. This study deploys a qualitative approach using in-depth semi-structured interviews with nine secondary school teachers in Bangladesh. The thematic analysis highlights a substantial gap between Bangladeshi school teachers’ professional ideologies and their involvement in private tutoring. The findings from the study reveal that the respondents perceive their dual roles as schoolteachers and tutors as controversial and detrimental to discharging their professional duties in an ideological way. They recurrently struggle to justify the dual roles that contribute to the dilemma of professional ideologies. As such, private tutoring does not just create a problem in classroom teaching but affects professional ideology and commitment to teaching principles. The study recommends policymakers and professionals look into these issues to gain a deeper insight into the existing private tutoring literature concerning teachers’ professional ideologies.","PeriodicalId":256338,"journal":{"name":"The Qualitative Report","volume":"39 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers’ professional ideology and their involvement in out-of-school hours (OoSH) practices have been questioned in recent times. This study explores how schoolteachers understand their professional ideology in relation to their OoSH practices and how they explain their participation in private tutoring in addition to formal schooling. This study deploys a qualitative approach using in-depth semi-structured interviews with nine secondary school teachers in Bangladesh. The thematic analysis highlights a substantial gap between Bangladeshi school teachers’ professional ideologies and their involvement in private tutoring. The findings from the study reveal that the respondents perceive their dual roles as schoolteachers and tutors as controversial and detrimental to discharging their professional duties in an ideological way. They recurrently struggle to justify the dual roles that contribute to the dilemma of professional ideologies. As such, private tutoring does not just create a problem in classroom teaching but affects professional ideology and commitment to teaching principles. The study recommends policymakers and professionals look into these issues to gain a deeper insight into the existing private tutoring literature concerning teachers’ professional ideologies.
校外教育中的教师:近代职业意识的模糊
近年来,教师的专业思想及其在校外实践中的参与受到了质疑。本研究探讨学校教师如何理解其职业意识与职业健康实践的关系,以及他们如何解释他们在正规学校之外参加私人辅导的原因。本研究采用定性方法,对孟加拉国九名中学教师进行了深入的半结构化访谈。专题分析突出了孟加拉国学校教师的专业意识形态与他们参与私人辅导之间的巨大差距。研究结果显示,受访者认为他们作为学校教师和导师的双重角色是有争议的,不利于以思想方式履行其专业职责。他们经常努力为双重角色辩护,这导致了职业意识形态的困境。因此,私教不仅给课堂教学带来了问题,而且影响了专业思想和对教学原则的坚守。本研究建议政策制定者和专业人士研究这些问题,以更深入地了解现有的关于教师专业思想的私人辅导文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信