Winners and losers from occupational segregation across Europe: the role of gender and migration status

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Amaia Palencia-Esteban, Coral del Río
{"title":"Winners and losers from occupational segregation across Europe: the role of gender and migration status","authors":"Amaia Palencia-Esteban, Coral del Río","doi":"10.1093/migration/mnad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using measures rooted in welfare economics, this article quantifies the economic consequences arising from occupational segregation by gender and migration status in twelve European countries. We also identify the most inclusive European labor markets by building counterfactual distributions. In particular, we remove cross-country differences in immigrants’ origin, years of residence, and education, thus determining the contribution that these variables make to the geographical disparities. Our results reveal that the economic consequences of segregation are negative for most foreign workers, especially for immigrant women in Italy, Spain, Germany, and Slovenia. Portugal emerges as a reference point because immigrant workers have a better position compared to other countries, which does not seem to arise from their basic individual characteristics. Our analysis highlights the importance of policy actions aimed at improving the occupational sorting of immigrant workers, such as investing in skills development, avoiding occupational downgrading, and incorporating a gender perspective.","PeriodicalId":46309,"journal":{"name":"Migration Studies","volume":"28 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnad029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Using measures rooted in welfare economics, this article quantifies the economic consequences arising from occupational segregation by gender and migration status in twelve European countries. We also identify the most inclusive European labor markets by building counterfactual distributions. In particular, we remove cross-country differences in immigrants’ origin, years of residence, and education, thus determining the contribution that these variables make to the geographical disparities. Our results reveal that the economic consequences of segregation are negative for most foreign workers, especially for immigrant women in Italy, Spain, Germany, and Slovenia. Portugal emerges as a reference point because immigrant workers have a better position compared to other countries, which does not seem to arise from their basic individual characteristics. Our analysis highlights the importance of policy actions aimed at improving the occupational sorting of immigrant workers, such as investing in skills development, avoiding occupational downgrading, and incorporating a gender perspective.
欧洲职业隔离的赢家和输家:性别和移民身份的作用
本文采用福利经济学的方法,量化了12个欧洲国家中按性别和移民身份划分的职业隔离所产生的经济后果。我们还通过建立反事实分布来确定最具包容性的欧洲劳动力市场。特别是,我们消除了移民的来源、居住年限和教育程度的跨国差异,从而确定了这些变量对地理差异的贡献。我们的研究结果表明,隔离对大多数外国工人的经济后果是负面的,特别是对意大利、西班牙、德国和斯洛文尼亚的移民妇女。葡萄牙之所以成为一个参照点,是因为与其他国家相比,移民工人的地位更好,而这似乎并非来自他们的基本个人特征。我们的分析强调了旨在改善移民工人职业分类的政策行动的重要性,例如投资于技能发展,避免职业降级,并纳入性别观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Migration Studies
Migration Studies DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Migration shapes human society and inspires ground-breaking research efforts across many different academic disciplines and policy areas. Migration Studies contributes to the consolidation of this field of scholarship, developing the core concepts that link different disciplinary perspectives on migration. To this end, the journal welcomes full-length articles, research notes, and reviews of books, films and other media from those working across the social sciences in all parts of the world. Priority is given to methodological, comparative and theoretical advances. The journal also publishes occasional special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信