{"title":"THE CATEGORY OF “PASCHALITY” AND ITS SENSE-GIVING FUNCTION IN ANTON CHEKHOV’S TALE “IN THE RAVINE”","authors":"Stephan Lipke","doi":"10.18522/1995-0640-2023-3-98-108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the category of “paschality”, introduced into Russian literature studies by Ivan Esaulov, in Anton Chekhov’s tale “In the Ravine”. In Russia, Easter is celebrated more solemnly than Christmas. According to I. Esaulov, this makes people give greater importance to life in Heaven and makes them ready to suffer and die in order to receive it. We recognize that the category of “paschality” can be fruitful for literature studies and, in particular, for the interpretation of Chekhov’s tale. Yet, we propose to amend it. We disagree with I. Esaulov’s opinion that giving a key importance to Easter distinguishes Russian Orthodoxy from the Christian West. But, first and foremost, we think that the paschal spirituality of the New Testament should not be juxtaposed neither to the Pascha (Passover, Exodus) of the Hebrew Bible, nor to the crucial role the New Testament gives to the Christmas mystery of the Incarnation. Instead, the paschal mystery should rather be seen as the continuation and fulfillment of both. This kind of “paschality” complements the social criticism of the tale “In the Ravine” and gives it a deeper sense. The horror described in “In the Ravine”, which reaches its culmination in the little child’s murder, is both exacerbated and softened by allusions to Christ’s birth and to Our Lady. Besides, due to references to the salvation of little Moses and the newborn Jesus, even ex negativo the tale alludes to Lipa’s and her fellow workers’ future salvation and liberation.","PeriodicalId":53326,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia Uznogo Federal''nogo Universiteta Filologiceskie Nauki","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia Uznogo Federal''nogo Universiteta Filologiceskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2023-3-98-108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We consider the category of “paschality”, introduced into Russian literature studies by Ivan Esaulov, in Anton Chekhov’s tale “In the Ravine”. In Russia, Easter is celebrated more solemnly than Christmas. According to I. Esaulov, this makes people give greater importance to life in Heaven and makes them ready to suffer and die in order to receive it. We recognize that the category of “paschality” can be fruitful for literature studies and, in particular, for the interpretation of Chekhov’s tale. Yet, we propose to amend it. We disagree with I. Esaulov’s opinion that giving a key importance to Easter distinguishes Russian Orthodoxy from the Christian West. But, first and foremost, we think that the paschal spirituality of the New Testament should not be juxtaposed neither to the Pascha (Passover, Exodus) of the Hebrew Bible, nor to the crucial role the New Testament gives to the Christmas mystery of the Incarnation. Instead, the paschal mystery should rather be seen as the continuation and fulfillment of both. This kind of “paschality” complements the social criticism of the tale “In the Ravine” and gives it a deeper sense. The horror described in “In the Ravine”, which reaches its culmination in the little child’s murder, is both exacerbated and softened by allusions to Christ’s birth and to Our Lady. Besides, due to references to the salvation of little Moses and the newborn Jesus, even ex negativo the tale alludes to Lipa’s and her fellow workers’ future salvation and liberation.
在契诃夫的小说《在峡谷里》中,伊凡·埃索洛夫将“paschality”这一范畴引入了俄罗斯文学研究。在俄罗斯,复活节的庆祝比圣诞节更为隆重。根据I. Esaulov的说法,这使人们更加重视在天堂的生活,并使他们准备好受苦和死亡来接受它。我们认识到,“paschality”这一范畴对文学研究,特别是对契诃夫的故事的解读,可能是富有成效的。然而,我们建议修改它。我们不同意I. Esaulov的观点,即给予复活节关键的重要性将俄罗斯东正教与基督教西方区分开来。但是,最重要的是,我们认为新约圣经的逾越节精神既不应该与希伯来圣经的Pascha(逾越节,出埃及记)并列,也不应该与新约圣经赋予圣诞节道成肉身奥秘的关键作用并列。相反,逾越奥迹应该被看作是两者的延续和完成。这种“paschality”与“In the canyon”故事的社会批判相辅相成,赋予了它更深刻的意义。《在峡谷里》中描述的恐怖,在小男孩被谋杀时达到了顶峰,由于对基督的诞生和圣母的暗示,这种恐怖既加剧了,又缓和了。此外,由于故事中提到了小摩西和新生的耶稣的得救,甚至在消极地暗示了利帕和她的同事们未来的救赎和解放。