The Effect of Operational Risks for Digital Banking Services at Banks

Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi, Humaira Naznii
{"title":"The Effect of Operational Risks for Digital Banking Services at Banks","authors":"Rio Dhani Laksana, Intan Shaferi, Humaira Naznii","doi":"10.18196/mb.v14i2.19302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aims: This research aims to analyze active digital banking users' perceptions of bank operational risks in providing digital banking services.Design/Methodology/Approach: This research design used a quantitative approach. The population in this study was banking customers who used Internet banking services. The sample taken in this study was 240 respondents from banks in the Banyumas Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. The method performed was purposive sampling. It used five banking risk management indicators.Research findings: Most people in the Banyumas region did not agree that Internet banking had high operational risks. As such, banks need to look at other operational risks, such as service disruptions, outsourcing failures, and internal fraud.Theoretical contribution/Originality: The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is an information system theory that models of how users want to accept and use technology. This model proposes that when users are offered a new system, several factors influence their decision about how and when to use the system, especially regarding the usefulness, ease of use, and external factors on beliefs, attitudes, and purpose of use.Practitioners/Policy implications: This research implemented digital banking and customer perceptions of bank operational risks in providing digital banking services because they are essential for understanding the digital banking industry. Research limitations/Implications: This study only used five indicators of banking operational risks, consisting of process, human, system, external, and legal. Other aspects, such as financial, marketing, and others, have yet to be included in this banking risk research indicator. For further research, it is suggested to add research variables, not only focusing on Internet banking applications but also on other digital banking products, such as mobile banking, phone banking, and SMS banking.","PeriodicalId":55764,"journal":{"name":"Benefit Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benefit Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v14i2.19302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research aims: This research aims to analyze active digital banking users' perceptions of bank operational risks in providing digital banking services.Design/Methodology/Approach: This research design used a quantitative approach. The population in this study was banking customers who used Internet banking services. The sample taken in this study was 240 respondents from banks in the Banyumas Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. The method performed was purposive sampling. It used five banking risk management indicators.Research findings: Most people in the Banyumas region did not agree that Internet banking had high operational risks. As such, banks need to look at other operational risks, such as service disruptions, outsourcing failures, and internal fraud.Theoretical contribution/Originality: The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is an information system theory that models of how users want to accept and use technology. This model proposes that when users are offered a new system, several factors influence their decision about how and when to use the system, especially regarding the usefulness, ease of use, and external factors on beliefs, attitudes, and purpose of use.Practitioners/Policy implications: This research implemented digital banking and customer perceptions of bank operational risks in providing digital banking services because they are essential for understanding the digital banking industry. Research limitations/Implications: This study only used five indicators of banking operational risks, consisting of process, human, system, external, and legal. Other aspects, such as financial, marketing, and others, have yet to be included in this banking risk research indicator. For further research, it is suggested to add research variables, not only focusing on Internet banking applications but also on other digital banking products, such as mobile banking, phone banking, and SMS banking.
操作风险对银行数字银行业务的影响
研究目的:本研究旨在分析活跃的数字银行用户在提供数字银行服务时对银行操作风险的认知。设计/方法/方法:本研究设计采用定量方法。本研究的对象是使用网上银行服务的银行客户。本研究的样本是来自印度尼西亚中爪哇Banyumas Regency的银行的240名受访者。采用目的抽样的方法。它使用了五项银行风险管理指标。研究发现:Banyumas地区大多数人不认为网上银行具有高操作风险。因此,银行需要关注其他操作风险,如服务中断、外包失败和内部欺诈。理论贡献/独创性:技术接受模型(Technology Acceptance Model, TAM)是一种信息系统理论,它描述了用户希望如何接受和使用技术。该模型提出,当向用户提供一个新系统时,有几个因素会影响他们关于如何以及何时使用该系统的决定,特别是关于有用性、易用性以及信念、态度和使用目的等外部因素。从业人员/政策影响:本研究在提供数字银行服务时实施了数字银行和客户对银行操作风险的看法,因为它们对于了解数字银行业至关重要。研究局限/启示:本研究仅使用流程、人力、制度、外部和法律五个指标来衡量银行操作风险。其他方面,如财务、营销等,尚未纳入银行风险研究指标。为了进一步研究,建议增加研究变量,不仅关注互联网银行应用,还关注其他数字银行产品,如手机银行、手机银行和短信银行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信