Gloss on the Judgement of the Polish Supreme Court of 2 June 2022, I KZP 17/21

IF 0.3
Jakub Kosowski
{"title":"Gloss on the Judgement of the Polish Supreme Court of 2 June 2022, I KZP 17/21","authors":"Jakub Kosowski","doi":"10.31743/recl.16549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the decision of the Polish Su­preme Court of 2 June 2022, I KZP 17/21. The ruling of the Su­preme Court was issued based on a legal question submitted by a common court in relation to the European Investigation Or­der (EIO). The Author refers to the ruling by discussing broadly both the issues of the legal question and the authority issuing the European Investigation Order within the framework of pre-trial proceedings. Of paramount importance are the characteristics of the subjective sphere, i.e. the authority empowered to issue a European Investigation Order from the point of view of legally protected confidential information, in particular bank secrecy constituting the subject matter that served the basis for the ruling of the Supreme Court being commented herein.","PeriodicalId":337306,"journal":{"name":"Review of European and Comparative Law","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.16549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the decision of the Polish Su­preme Court of 2 June 2022, I KZP 17/21. The ruling of the Su­preme Court was issued based on a legal question submitted by a common court in relation to the European Investigation Or­der (EIO). The Author refers to the ruling by discussing broadly both the issues of the legal question and the authority issuing the European Investigation Order within the framework of pre-trial proceedings. Of paramount importance are the characteristics of the subjective sphere, i.e. the authority empowered to issue a European Investigation Order from the point of view of legally protected confidential information, in particular bank secrecy constituting the subject matter that served the basis for the ruling of the Supreme Court being commented herein.
对波兰最高法院2022年6月2日判决的注解,I KZP 17/21
本文讨论了2022年6月2日波兰最高法院I KZP 17/21的决定。最高法院的裁决是根据一个普通法院就欧洲调查命令(EIO)提出的法律问题作出的。发件人通过在审前程序框架内广泛讨论法律问题和发布欧洲调查令的当局的问题来提及这项裁决。最重要的是主观领域的特点,即有权从受法律保护的机密资料的角度发出欧洲调查令的当局,特别是银行秘密,构成了在此评论的最高法院裁决的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书