The Effects of Professional Sports Team’s CSR Beneficiary Message Appeal on Team Loyalty

Jun-Seon Yang, Junsang Ahn
{"title":"The Effects of Professional Sports Team’s CSR Beneficiary Message Appeal on Team Loyalty","authors":"Jun-Seon Yang, Junsang Ahn","doi":"10.24985/kjss.2023.34.3.466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility PR message appeals employed by professional sports teams.METHODS The authors categorized message appeals into self-benefit inclusion and self-benefit exclusion, and evaluated their impact in both public and private evaluation contexts. A 2 (beneficiary message appeal: self-benefit inclusion vs. selfbenefit exclusion) × 2 (message evaluation: public vs private) design model was employed. Data were collected from 165 respondents at a major university in Korea and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0.RESULTS The findings revealed that team loyalty was higher among individuals exposed to self-benefit inclusion messages than those exposed to self-benefit exclusion messages. Additionally, an interaction effect was observed between beneficiary message appeal and message evaluation. Specifically, the self-benefit appeal message was more effective when individuals had lower public self-image concern, while the self-benefit exclusion message was more effective when public self-image concerns were higher.CONCLUSIONS Team loyalty was found to be significantly higher in private evaluation situations for self-benefit inclusion messages, whereas, for self-benefit exclusion messages, the impact of public evaluation situations on team loyalty was greater than in private evaluations.","PeriodicalId":17892,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2023.34.3.466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility PR message appeals employed by professional sports teams.METHODS The authors categorized message appeals into self-benefit inclusion and self-benefit exclusion, and evaluated their impact in both public and private evaluation contexts. A 2 (beneficiary message appeal: self-benefit inclusion vs. selfbenefit exclusion) × 2 (message evaluation: public vs private) design model was employed. Data were collected from 165 respondents at a major university in Korea and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0.RESULTS The findings revealed that team loyalty was higher among individuals exposed to self-benefit inclusion messages than those exposed to self-benefit exclusion messages. Additionally, an interaction effect was observed between beneficiary message appeal and message evaluation. Specifically, the self-benefit appeal message was more effective when individuals had lower public self-image concern, while the self-benefit exclusion message was more effective when public self-image concerns were higher.CONCLUSIONS Team loyalty was found to be significantly higher in private evaluation situations for self-benefit inclusion messages, whereas, for self-benefit exclusion messages, the impact of public evaluation situations on team loyalty was greater than in private evaluations.
职业运动队CSR受益信息诉求对团队忠诚的影响
目的本研究旨在检验职业运动队运用企业社会责任公关讯息诉求的有效性。方法将信息呼吁分为自利包容和自利排斥两类,并在公共和私人评估环境下评估其影响。采用2(受益人信息诉求:自利包容vs自利排斥)× 2(信息评价:公共vs私人)设计模型。以国内某重点大学的165名调查对象为对象,利用SPSS 20.0版进行分析。结果自利包容信息的团队忠诚度高于自利排斥信息的团队忠诚度。此外,受益人信息诉求与信息评价之间存在交互效应。其中,私利诉求信息在公众自我形象关注度较低时更有效,私利排斥信息在公众自我形象关注度较高时更有效。结论自我利益包容信息的私人评价情境对团队忠诚的影响显著高于自我利益排斥信息,而公共评价情境对团队忠诚的影响大于私人评价情境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信