COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATIONS IN THE LUMBAR SPINE

Dmytro I. Ishchenko, Oleksandr V. Pechyborshch, Hlib O. Lazarenko
{"title":"COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATIONS IN THE LUMBAR SPINE","authors":"Dmytro I. Ishchenko, Oleksandr V. Pechyborshch, Hlib O. Lazarenko","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.4(26).2023.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Intervertebral disc herniations are a common condition that is often associated with painful sensations and restricted spinal mobility. Since this condition can significantly deteriorate a patient's quality of life, it is essential to seek effective and safe methods for its treatment. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of treating patients with pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation, which includes performing surgical interventions for hernia removal using endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques, is a relevant task today. In this context, comparing endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical interventions becomes a pertinent topic for research, as it can help determine the optimal treatment method for each patient.
 The aim of the study is to compare endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical procedures for intervertebral disc herniations in the lumbar spine.
 Materials and Methods. The study involved 100 patients diagnosed with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Of these, 50 patients underwent endoscopic surgery, while the remaining 50 underwent minimally invasive surgery. The effectiveness and safety of both methods were compared using several criteria, including the duration of surgery, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain level, overall health status, the incidence of complications, and patient satisfaction with the procedure.
 Results. Compared to minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic surgery resulted in lower blood loss, shorter treatment duration, reduced pain levels, and fewer complications. All patients in both groups returned to normal activity according to their health status.
 Conclusions. Endoscopic surgery is more effective and safer compared to minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of herniated intervertebral discs in the lumbar spine. The endoscopic technique allows for better visualization and more precise manipulation in hernia removal, which positively affects treatment outcomes, reduces the risk of complications, shortens hospitalization, and leads to faster patient recovery. The results of this study can be valuable for physicians and patients when choosing the method of treatment for herniated intervertebral discs in the lumbar spine.","PeriodicalId":34164,"journal":{"name":"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(26).2023.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Intervertebral disc herniations are a common condition that is often associated with painful sensations and restricted spinal mobility. Since this condition can significantly deteriorate a patient's quality of life, it is essential to seek effective and safe methods for its treatment. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of treating patients with pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation, which includes performing surgical interventions for hernia removal using endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques, is a relevant task today. In this context, comparing endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical interventions becomes a pertinent topic for research, as it can help determine the optimal treatment method for each patient. The aim of the study is to compare endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical procedures for intervertebral disc herniations in the lumbar spine. Materials and Methods. The study involved 100 patients diagnosed with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Of these, 50 patients underwent endoscopic surgery, while the remaining 50 underwent minimally invasive surgery. The effectiveness and safety of both methods were compared using several criteria, including the duration of surgery, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain level, overall health status, the incidence of complications, and patient satisfaction with the procedure. Results. Compared to minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic surgery resulted in lower blood loss, shorter treatment duration, reduced pain levels, and fewer complications. All patients in both groups returned to normal activity according to their health status. Conclusions. Endoscopic surgery is more effective and safer compared to minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of herniated intervertebral discs in the lumbar spine. The endoscopic technique allows for better visualization and more precise manipulation in hernia removal, which positively affects treatment outcomes, reduces the risk of complications, shortens hospitalization, and leads to faster patient recovery. The results of this study can be valuable for physicians and patients when choosing the method of treatment for herniated intervertebral discs in the lumbar spine.
内镜与微创手术治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的比较
介绍。椎间盘突出是一种常见的疾病,通常伴有疼痛感和脊柱活动受限。由于这种情况会严重恶化患者的生活质量,因此寻求有效和安全的治疗方法至关重要。因此,评估治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛的有效性和安全性,包括采用内镜和微创技术进行手术切除疝,是当今的一项相关任务。在这种背景下,比较内镜和微创手术干预成为一个相关的研究课题,因为它可以帮助确定每个患者的最佳治疗方法。 本研究的目的是比较内窥镜和微创手术治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的效果。 材料与方法。该研究涉及100名诊断为腰椎间盘突出的患者。其中,50例患者行内窥镜手术,其余50例行微创手术。采用手术时间、出血量、住院时间、疼痛程度、整体健康状况、并发症发生率和患者对手术的满意度等标准比较两种方法的有效性和安全性。 结果。与微创手术相比,内镜手术出血量更少,治疗时间更短,疼痛程度更低,并发症更少。两组患者均根据健康状况恢复正常活动。 结论。内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症比微创手术更有效、更安全。内窥镜技术可以更好地可视化和更精确地操作疝切除,从而对治疗结果产生积极影响,降低并发症的风险,缩短住院时间,并使患者更快康复。本研究的结果对医生和患者选择治疗腰椎间盘突出症的方法具有参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信