Meta-analysis of Stuttering Prevalence and Incidence

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Kyungjae Lee
{"title":"Meta-analysis of Stuttering Prevalence and Incidence","authors":"Kyungjae Lee","doi":"10.12963/csd.23974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Stuttering prevalence and incidence can be measured in very diverse ways and such differences in methodologies may contribute to variability of the results. Moreover stuttering prevalence and incidence can be different according to factors such as gender and age. The current study tried to provide a comprehensive view on stuttering prevalence and incidence through meta-analysis of the research results. We also tried to determine whether stuttering prevalence and incidence would be different according to gender, age, and region. Methods: A total of four databases (two Korean and two English databases) were used in the current study for article search. A total of 27 articles (26 English, 1 Korean) met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were analyzed in the current study. Results: Overall stuttering prevalence was about 1.5% and overall stuttering incidence was about 3.9%. There was a statistically significant difference in stuttering prevalence according to gender and age. Stuttering prevalence for males and preschoolers was almost twice as much as that of females and other age groups. However there was no significant difference in prevalence according to regions. Furthermore there was no significant difference in stuttering incidence according to gender. Conclusion: The meta-analysis results of the current study showed very similar, but still somewhat different stuttering prevalence and incidence compared to the commonly held belief. Such differences may be due to the typical characteristics of the studies analyzed in the current study. There may be future studies on more diverse factors that influence stuttering prevalence and incidence.","PeriodicalId":45124,"journal":{"name":"Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.23974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Stuttering prevalence and incidence can be measured in very diverse ways and such differences in methodologies may contribute to variability of the results. Moreover stuttering prevalence and incidence can be different according to factors such as gender and age. The current study tried to provide a comprehensive view on stuttering prevalence and incidence through meta-analysis of the research results. We also tried to determine whether stuttering prevalence and incidence would be different according to gender, age, and region. Methods: A total of four databases (two Korean and two English databases) were used in the current study for article search. A total of 27 articles (26 English, 1 Korean) met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were analyzed in the current study. Results: Overall stuttering prevalence was about 1.5% and overall stuttering incidence was about 3.9%. There was a statistically significant difference in stuttering prevalence according to gender and age. Stuttering prevalence for males and preschoolers was almost twice as much as that of females and other age groups. However there was no significant difference in prevalence according to regions. Furthermore there was no significant difference in stuttering incidence according to gender. Conclusion: The meta-analysis results of the current study showed very similar, but still somewhat different stuttering prevalence and incidence compared to the commonly held belief. Such differences may be due to the typical characteristics of the studies analyzed in the current study. There may be future studies on more diverse factors that influence stuttering prevalence and incidence.
口吃患病率和发病率的荟萃分析
目的:口吃的患病率和发病率可以用非常不同的方法来测量,这种方法上的差异可能导致结果的可变性。此外,根据性别和年龄等因素,口吃的患病率和发病率可能有所不同。本研究试图通过对研究结果的荟萃分析,全面了解口吃的患病率和发病率。我们还试图确定口吃的患病率和发病率是否会因性别、年龄和地区而不同。方法:本研究共使用4个数据库(2个韩文数据库和2个英文数据库)进行文章检索。共有27篇文章(26篇英文,1篇韩文)符合纳入/排除标准,并在本研究中进行了分析。结果:总体口吃患病率约为1.5%,总体口吃发病率约为3.9%。不同性别和年龄的口吃患病率有统计学上的显著差异。男性和学龄前儿童的口吃患病率几乎是女性和其他年龄组的两倍。但各地区患病率无显著差异。此外,不同性别的口吃发生率无显著差异。结论:本研究的荟萃分析结果显示,与普遍认为的口吃患病率和发病率非常相似,但仍有一些不同。这种差异可能是由于本研究分析的研究具有典型特征。未来可能会对影响口吃患病率和发病率的更多不同因素进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD
Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
80.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信