A Meta-analysis Study on the Communication Attitudes of People Who Do and Do Not Stutter by Age

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Eunna Kim, Hyun Sub Sim, Young Tae Kim
{"title":"A Meta-analysis Study on the Communication Attitudes of People Who Do and Do Not Stutter by Age","authors":"Eunna Kim, Hyun Sub Sim, Young Tae Kim","doi":"10.12963/csd.23957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the communicative attitudes of stuttering groups with the general population using a meta-analysis and to examine the patterns of change in communicative attitudes across different age groups: pre-school, school-age, and adults. Methods: The author conducted a meta-analysis to compare communication attitude scores between people who stutter (PWS) and people who do not stutter (PWNS) from 2000 to June 2022 using domestic and foreign databases. 15 articles meeting the selection criteria were included, with 16 data points extracted. The study aimed to determine the overall effect size of communication attitude scores between groups and to analyze age as a moderator. Results: The overall effect size of the communication attitude scores between the two groups showed a large effect size (<i>g</i> = 2.507) and was statistically significant. Meta ANOVA analysis of group communication attitude scores by age category showed that there was a significant difference in effect size between the three age categories (χ<sup>2</sup> = 13.53, <i>p</i> < .01). Post-hoc analysis was performed, and there was no significant difference in effect size between the pre-school and school-age groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.72, <i>p</i> = .40). A large effect size and a statistically significant difference were observed between the school-age and adult groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.95, <i>p</i> < .05), and a very large effect size and a statistically significant difference were observed between the pre-school and adult groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=13.52, <i>p</i> < .01). Conclusion: The research findings indicate that individuals who stutter exhibited more negative communicative attitudes compared to the non-stuttering group across all age groups. Particularly during adulthood, the negative communicative attitudes were more pronounced when compared to the other two age groups (pre-school and school-age). Therefore, when providing treatment for stuttering, it is important to not only focus on external behaviors but also incorporate activities that address age-appropriate communicative attitudes.","PeriodicalId":45124,"journal":{"name":"Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.23957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the communicative attitudes of stuttering groups with the general population using a meta-analysis and to examine the patterns of change in communicative attitudes across different age groups: pre-school, school-age, and adults. Methods: The author conducted a meta-analysis to compare communication attitude scores between people who stutter (PWS) and people who do not stutter (PWNS) from 2000 to June 2022 using domestic and foreign databases. 15 articles meeting the selection criteria were included, with 16 data points extracted. The study aimed to determine the overall effect size of communication attitude scores between groups and to analyze age as a moderator. Results: The overall effect size of the communication attitude scores between the two groups showed a large effect size (g = 2.507) and was statistically significant. Meta ANOVA analysis of group communication attitude scores by age category showed that there was a significant difference in effect size between the three age categories (χ2 = 13.53, p < .01). Post-hoc analysis was performed, and there was no significant difference in effect size between the pre-school and school-age groups (χ2 = 0.72, p = .40). A large effect size and a statistically significant difference were observed between the school-age and adult groups (χ2 = 5.95, p < .05), and a very large effect size and a statistically significant difference were observed between the pre-school and adult groups (χ2=13.52, p < .01). Conclusion: The research findings indicate that individuals who stutter exhibited more negative communicative attitudes compared to the non-stuttering group across all age groups. Particularly during adulthood, the negative communicative attitudes were more pronounced when compared to the other two age groups (pre-school and school-age). Therefore, when providing treatment for stuttering, it is important to not only focus on external behaviors but also incorporate activities that address age-appropriate communicative attitudes.
不同年龄口吃者与非口吃者沟通态度的元分析研究
目的:本研究旨在通过荟萃分析比较口吃群体与一般人群的交流态度,并考察不同年龄组(学龄前、学龄和成年)交流态度的变化模式。方法:利用国内外数据库,对2000年至2022年6月口吃者(PWS)与非口吃者(PWNS)沟通态度得分进行meta分析比较。15篇符合选择标准的文章被纳入,提取了16个数据点。该研究旨在确定群体之间沟通态度得分的总体效应大小,并分析年龄作为调节因素。结果:两组沟通态度得分的总体效应量呈现较大的效应量(<i>g</i>= 2.507),差异有统计学意义。分组沟通态度得分按年龄分类的Meta方差分析显示,三个年龄分类的效应量差异有统计学意义(χ<sup>2</sup>= 13.53, <i> </i>& lt;. 01)。经事后分析,学龄前和学龄组的效应量无显著差异(χ<sup>2</sup>= 0.72, <i>p</i>= .40)。学龄组和成年组之间存在较大的效应量,差异有统计学意义(χ<sup>2</sup>= 5.95, <i>p</i>& lt;.05),学前组和成人组之间存在非常大的效应量,差异有统计学意义(χ<sup>2</sup>=13.52, <i>p</i>& lt;. 01)。结论:研究结果表明,在所有年龄组中,口吃者比非口吃者表现出更多的消极交际态度。特别是在成年期,与其他两个年龄组(学龄前和学龄)相比,消极的沟通态度更为明显。因此,在提供口吃治疗时,重要的是不仅要关注外部行为,而且要结合处理与年龄相适应的交流态度的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD
Communication Sciences and Disorders-CSD AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
80.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信