Quantitative assessment of health, safety, and environment (HSE) resilience based on the Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in municipal solid waste management system: A case study in Tehran

IF 1.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kamal Karimzadeh, Ghazaleh Monazami Tehrani, Shokooh Sadat Khaloo, Mohammad Hossein Vaziri, Sama Amirkhani Ardeh, Reza Saeedi
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of health, safety, and environment (HSE) resilience based on the Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in municipal solid waste management system: A case study in Tehran","authors":"Kamal Karimzadeh, Ghazaleh Monazami Tehrani, Shokooh Sadat Khaloo, Mohammad Hossein Vaziri, Sama Amirkhani Ardeh, Reza Saeedi","doi":"10.34172/ehem.2023.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The health, safety, and environment (HSE) resilience is the ability of a system to adapt, resist and cope with the HSE risks in critical situations. In this study, the HSE resilience in solid waste management (SWM) system of Tehran was quantitatively assessed using HSE resilience index (HSE-RI). Methods: The principles and components of HSE-RI were determined and weighted based on the expert panel opinions using Delphi technique and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The HSE-RI scores were divided into five categories as very good (80-100), good (65-79), medium (50-64), weak (35-49), and very weak (0-34). Results: The weights of the HSE-RI principles in the SWM system were determined as follows: 0.376 for top management commitment, 0.149 for awareness and risk perception, 0.144 for preparedness, 0.144 for performance, 0.057 for reporting and just culture, 0.0574 for learning culture, 0.055 for flexibility, and 0.017 for redundancy. The highest and lowest scores of the resilience principles in the SWM system were related to the principles of awareness and risk perception (73.6), and reporting and just culture (45.1), respectively. The HSE-RI score in the SWM system was 62.9 (medium). Conclusion: The results of this study based on the Delphi method and AHP showed that the HSE resilience in the SWM system of Tehran was not at the desired level. The principles of top management commitment (with the highest weight), reporting and just culture and preparedness (with the lowest scores) were determined as the most effective points for improving the HSE resilience in the SWM system of Tehran.","PeriodicalId":51877,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ehem.2023.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The health, safety, and environment (HSE) resilience is the ability of a system to adapt, resist and cope with the HSE risks in critical situations. In this study, the HSE resilience in solid waste management (SWM) system of Tehran was quantitatively assessed using HSE resilience index (HSE-RI). Methods: The principles and components of HSE-RI were determined and weighted based on the expert panel opinions using Delphi technique and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The HSE-RI scores were divided into five categories as very good (80-100), good (65-79), medium (50-64), weak (35-49), and very weak (0-34). Results: The weights of the HSE-RI principles in the SWM system were determined as follows: 0.376 for top management commitment, 0.149 for awareness and risk perception, 0.144 for preparedness, 0.144 for performance, 0.057 for reporting and just culture, 0.0574 for learning culture, 0.055 for flexibility, and 0.017 for redundancy. The highest and lowest scores of the resilience principles in the SWM system were related to the principles of awareness and risk perception (73.6), and reporting and just culture (45.1), respectively. The HSE-RI score in the SWM system was 62.9 (medium). Conclusion: The results of this study based on the Delphi method and AHP showed that the HSE resilience in the SWM system of Tehran was not at the desired level. The principles of top management commitment (with the highest weight), reporting and just culture and preparedness (with the lowest scores) were determined as the most effective points for improving the HSE resilience in the SWM system of Tehran.
基于德尔菲法和层次分析法(AHP)的城市固体废物管理系统健康、安全和环境(HSE)弹性定量评价:以德黑兰为例
背景:健康、安全与环境(HSE)弹性是系统在危急情况下适应、抵抗和应对HSE风险的能力。本研究采用HSE弹性指数(HSE- ri)对德黑兰固体废物管理(SWM)系统的HSE弹性进行了定量评估。方法:采用德尔菲法和层次分析法(AHP),在专家小组意见的基础上确定HSE-RI的原则和组成,并进行加权。HSE-RI得分分为非常好(80-100)、良好(65-79)、中等(50-64)、较弱(35-49)和非常弱(0-34)五个类别。结果:在SWM系统中,HSE-RI原则的权重确定如下:最高管理层承诺0.376,意识和风险感知0.149,准备0.144,绩效0.144,报告和公平文化0.057,学习文化0.0574,灵活性0.055,冗余0.017。SWM系统中弹性原则的最高和最低得分分别与意识和风险感知原则(73.6分)以及报告和公正文化原则(45.1分)有关。在SWM系统中,HSE-RI得分为62.9分(中等)。结论:基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的研究结果表明,德黑兰SWM系统的HSE弹性未达到预期水平。最高管理层承诺原则(权重最高)、报告原则、公正文化和准备原则(得分最低)被确定为提高德黑兰SWM系统HSE弹性的最有效点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
37.50%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信