Comparison of pressure, temperature and specific humidity from COSMIC-2 with radiosonde and ERA5

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Chunhua Jiang, Xiang Gao, Shuaimin Wang, Qianfang An, Meizhen Zhu
{"title":"Comparison of pressure, temperature and specific humidity from COSMIC-2 with radiosonde and ERA5","authors":"Chunhua Jiang, Xiang Gao, Shuaimin Wang, Qianfang An, Meizhen Zhu","doi":"10.1080/14498596.2023.2250749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPressure, temperature and specific humidity profiles from COSMIC-2 are compared with those from ERA5 and radiosonde data from October 2019 to September 2020. The results demonstrate that COSMIC-2 pressure and specific humidity profiles show relatively poor accuracy and stability in the lower troposphere. The 1D-Var solution effectively improves the accuracy of temperature parameters in the troposphere. Three parameters show high accuracy over one climatological year, but show slight seasonal fluctuations, especially for the specific humidity profiles in summer. Furthermore, COSMIC-2 specific humidity data show low consistency with radiosonde and ERA5 in the equatorial region.KEYWORDS: COSMIC-2ERA5radiosonde1D-Var AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the UCAR (University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) for providing COSMIC-2 profiles data and University of Wyoming for providing radiosonde data. The ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Meteorological Weather Forecasts) is appreciated for providing ERA5 reanalysis products. The numerical calculatione in this study have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center, Shandong University, Weihai.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe COSMIC-2 profiles data can be downloaded from https://data.cosmic.ucar.edu/gnss-ro/cosmic2/nrt/level2/. The radiosonde data can be downloaded from http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html. The ERA5 reanalysis products can be downloaded from https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5/.Additional informationFundingThis research is founded by the Startup Foundation for Doctors of Liaoning Province. [2021-BS-275], the Scientific Study Project for lnstitutes of Higher Learning, Ministry of Education, Liaoning Province [LJKMZ20220673], the Project supported by the State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earths’ Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology [SKLGED2023-3-2]; Project supported by the State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earths’Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology.","PeriodicalId":50045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spatial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spatial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2023.2250749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTPressure, temperature and specific humidity profiles from COSMIC-2 are compared with those from ERA5 and radiosonde data from October 2019 to September 2020. The results demonstrate that COSMIC-2 pressure and specific humidity profiles show relatively poor accuracy and stability in the lower troposphere. The 1D-Var solution effectively improves the accuracy of temperature parameters in the troposphere. Three parameters show high accuracy over one climatological year, but show slight seasonal fluctuations, especially for the specific humidity profiles in summer. Furthermore, COSMIC-2 specific humidity data show low consistency with radiosonde and ERA5 in the equatorial region.KEYWORDS: COSMIC-2ERA5radiosonde1D-Var AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the UCAR (University Corporation for Atmospheric Research) for providing COSMIC-2 profiles data and University of Wyoming for providing radiosonde data. The ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Meteorological Weather Forecasts) is appreciated for providing ERA5 reanalysis products. The numerical calculatione in this study have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center, Shandong University, Weihai.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe COSMIC-2 profiles data can be downloaded from https://data.cosmic.ucar.edu/gnss-ro/cosmic2/nrt/level2/. The radiosonde data can be downloaded from http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html. The ERA5 reanalysis products can be downloaded from https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5/.Additional informationFundingThis research is founded by the Startup Foundation for Doctors of Liaoning Province. [2021-BS-275], the Scientific Study Project for lnstitutes of Higher Learning, Ministry of Education, Liaoning Province [LJKMZ20220673], the Project supported by the State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earths’ Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology [SKLGED2023-3-2]; Project supported by the State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earths’Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology.
COSMIC-2与无线电探空仪和ERA5的压力、温度和比湿度比较
摘要将2019年10月至2020年9月COSMIC-2与ERA5和探空数据的压力、温度和比湿度曲线进行了比较。结果表明,COSMIC-2气压和比湿度廓线在对流层下层精度和稳定性较差。d - var解有效地提高了对流层温度参数的精度。3个参数在一个气候年内具有较高的精度,但在夏季的具体湿度廓线有轻微的季节波动。此外,COSMIC-2在赤道地区的比湿度数据与探空和ERA5的一致性较低。作者感谢UCAR(大学大气研究公司)提供COSMIC-2剖面数据和怀俄明大学提供无线电探空数据。感谢欧洲中期气象预报中心(ECMWF)提供ERA5再分析产品。本研究在山东大学威海超级计算中心的超级计算系统上进行了数值计算。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明COSMIC-2配置文件数据可从https://data.cosmic.ucar.edu/gnss-ro/cosmic2/nrt/level2/下载。无线电探空数据可从http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html下载。ERA5再分析产品可从https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5/.Additional信息下载。本研究由辽宁省医生创业基金资助。[2021-BS-275],辽宁省高等学校科学研究项目[LJKMZ20220673],精密测量科学技术创新研究院大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室[SKLGED2023-3-2];精密测量科学技术创新研究院大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室资助的课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spatial Science
Journal of Spatial Science 地学-地质学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Spatial Science publishes papers broadly across the spatial sciences including such areas as cartography, geodesy, geographic information science, hydrography, digital image analysis and photogrammetry, remote sensing, surveying and related areas. Two types of papers are published by he journal: Research Papers and Professional Papers. Research Papers (including reviews) are peer-reviewed and must meet a minimum standard of making a contribution to the knowledge base of an area of the spatial sciences. This can be achieved through the empirical or theoretical contribution to knowledge that produces significant new outcomes. It is anticipated that Professional Papers will be written by industry practitioners. Professional Papers describe innovative aspects of professional practise and applications that advance the development of the spatial industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信