Social Location, Power, and Disadvantage: Experiences of MFT Faculty

IF 0.5 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Gita Seshadri, Sergio Pereyra, Karen Quek, Hao-Min Chen, Alex Hsieh
{"title":"Social Location, Power, and Disadvantage: Experiences of MFT Faculty","authors":"Gita Seshadri, Sergio Pereyra, Karen Quek, Hao-Min Chen, Alex Hsieh","doi":"10.1080/08952833.2023.2260058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe intersectionality of social identities is couched with status and power relations, creating both oppression and opportunity. Intersectionality explains the unique and challenging roles faculty of color play in showcasing their different identities within the dominant discourse. Using an approach of discourse analysis, we explored six stories of experiences being COAMFTE accredited graduates of Marriage and Family Therapy programs who became professionals. Further, we explored the intersection of their professional identities (e.g. clinicians, professors, supervisors, administrators), and how these intersected with their lived experiences of their social locations, while negotiating power, privilege, and disadvantage. These stories revealed three overarching discourses: subtle, contradictory, and discriminating messages, hidden and raw emotional experiences, and the strategies of the comeback. It is our hope that this discussion informs and provides examples for others as they practice within mental health and academia while navigating these roles within their own intersections. Systemic suggestions are also provided.KEYWORDS: academiadisadvantagefaculty of colorintersectionalitypower Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical StatementWith the submission of this manuscript, we would like to mention that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere, accepted for publication elsewhere, or under editorial review for publication elsewhere; and that our Institution’s representatives (respectively) are fully aware of this submission. Also, we have no conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial). Since we used secondary data from a published book, there was no contact with human participants.","PeriodicalId":44214,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2023.2260058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe intersectionality of social identities is couched with status and power relations, creating both oppression and opportunity. Intersectionality explains the unique and challenging roles faculty of color play in showcasing their different identities within the dominant discourse. Using an approach of discourse analysis, we explored six stories of experiences being COAMFTE accredited graduates of Marriage and Family Therapy programs who became professionals. Further, we explored the intersection of their professional identities (e.g. clinicians, professors, supervisors, administrators), and how these intersected with their lived experiences of their social locations, while negotiating power, privilege, and disadvantage. These stories revealed three overarching discourses: subtle, contradictory, and discriminating messages, hidden and raw emotional experiences, and the strategies of the comeback. It is our hope that this discussion informs and provides examples for others as they practice within mental health and academia while navigating these roles within their own intersections. Systemic suggestions are also provided.KEYWORDS: academiadisadvantagefaculty of colorintersectionalitypower Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical StatementWith the submission of this manuscript, we would like to mention that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere, accepted for publication elsewhere, or under editorial review for publication elsewhere; and that our Institution’s representatives (respectively) are fully aware of this submission. Also, we have no conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial). Since we used secondary data from a published book, there was no contact with human participants.
社会定位、权力与劣势:MFT教师的经验
【摘要】社会身份的交叉性与地位关系和权力关系交织在一起,既造成了压迫,也创造了机会。交叉性解释了在主流话语中,色彩教师在展示其不同身份时所扮演的独特而具有挑战性的角色。使用话语分析的方法,我们探索了六个故事,这些故事是由COAMFTE认证的婚姻和家庭治疗项目毕业生成为专业人士的经历。此外,我们还探讨了他们的职业身份(如临床医生、教授、主管、管理人员)的交集,以及这些身份如何与他们在谈判权力、特权和劣势时的社会地位的生活经历相交叉。这些故事揭示了三个主要的话语:微妙的、矛盾的和歧视性的信息,隐藏的和原始的情感体验,以及回归的策略。我们希望这一讨论能够为其他人提供信息和榜样,因为他们在心理健康和学术界实践,同时在自己的交叉点中定位这些角色。并提出了系统的建议。关键词:学术劣势有色学院交叉权力披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。在提交这篇稿件时,我们想要说明的是,这篇稿件没有在其他地方发表,没有被其他地方接受发表,也没有在其他地方进行编辑审查。并且我们机构的代表(分别)完全了解这一提交。此外,我们没有利益冲突(财务或非财务)。由于我们使用的二手数据来自一本已出版的书,因此没有与人类参与者接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy provides an international forum to further explore the relationship between feminist theory and family therapy theory and practice. The journal presents thought-provoking and insightful articles of a theoretical nature, as well as articles focusing on empirical research and clinical application. The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy critiques family therapy concepts from a feminist perspective with careful attention to cultural, class, and racial differences, applies a feminist-sensitive perspective to the treatment issues particular to women such as depression, agoraphobia, eating disorders, incest, and domestic abuse, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信