‘Fast-paced,' ‘snakey' and ‘commercial': How American student audiences make sense of representations of journalism in fictional television series

Maxine De Wulf Helskens, Sarah Van Leuven, Frederik Dhaenens
{"title":"‘Fast-paced,' ‘snakey' and ‘commercial': How American student audiences make sense of representations of journalism in fictional television series","authors":"Maxine De Wulf Helskens, Sarah Van Leuven, Frederik Dhaenens","doi":"10.1177/14648849231203089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study set out to understand how student audiences make sense of fictional representations of journalism in television series. To do so, we conducted five focus groups with American students. First, participants expressed a need for more diversity in representations of journalism in terms of narratives and characters as they see fiction as a complementary source of information on the profession. They relied on non-fictional reference media, normative journalistic discourses, and if applicable, experiences with working in (school) newsrooms to make sense of these representations. Second, they discussed how public opinion on journalism is influenced by fiction and consequently fear that one-sided and stereotypical representations of journalism contribute to increasing the already low levels of mistrust in U.S. news media. This fear was also found to be gendered as the participants expressed concerns about the stereotypical representation of female and minority journalists as “bitchy” and “promiscuous.” This manuscript puts forward journalism fiction as a metajournalistic discourse in which non-fictional and fictional journalism blur in confounding ways.","PeriodicalId":357407,"journal":{"name":"Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231203089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study set out to understand how student audiences make sense of fictional representations of journalism in television series. To do so, we conducted five focus groups with American students. First, participants expressed a need for more diversity in representations of journalism in terms of narratives and characters as they see fiction as a complementary source of information on the profession. They relied on non-fictional reference media, normative journalistic discourses, and if applicable, experiences with working in (school) newsrooms to make sense of these representations. Second, they discussed how public opinion on journalism is influenced by fiction and consequently fear that one-sided and stereotypical representations of journalism contribute to increasing the already low levels of mistrust in U.S. news media. This fear was also found to be gendered as the participants expressed concerns about the stereotypical representation of female and minority journalists as “bitchy” and “promiscuous.” This manuscript puts forward journalism fiction as a metajournalistic discourse in which non-fictional and fictional journalism blur in confounding ways.
“快节奏”、“狡猾”和“商业化”:美国学生观众如何理解虚构电视连续剧中的新闻表现
本研究旨在了解学生观众如何理解电视连续剧中虚构的新闻表现。为此,我们与美国学生进行了五个焦点小组讨论。首先,与会者表示,需要在叙述和人物方面增加新闻报道的多样性,因为他们认为小说是新闻行业信息的补充来源。他们依靠非虚构的参考媒体,规范的新闻话语,如果适用的话,在(学校)新闻编辑室工作的经验来理解这些表述。其次,他们讨论了公众对新闻业的看法是如何受到小说的影响的,并因此担心片面和刻板的新闻报道会增加美国新闻媒体本已很低的不信任程度。这种恐惧也被发现与性别有关,因为参与者表达了对女性和少数族裔记者“恶毒”和“滥交”的刻板印象的担忧。本文提出新闻小说是一种元新闻话语,在这种话语中,非虚构和虚构的新闻以混淆的方式模糊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信