A comparative study of stigma and mental health status between patients with erectile dysfunction and patients with erectile dysfunction and diabetes

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
{"title":"A comparative study of stigma and mental health status between patients with erectile dysfunction and patients with erectile dysfunction and diabetes","authors":"","doi":"10.22514/jomh.2023.069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, although stigma and mental health among patients with diabetes have garnered significant research attention, there are still limited investigations into the stigma and mental health of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and diabetes. In this study, we aimed to examine the stigma and mental health of patients with ED and diabetes to provide insights for improving the treatment and nursing of patients with ED and diabetes. We selected 82 patients with ED and diabetes and 82 patients with ED. Patients were evaluated using the Basic Information Scale, Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Social Impact Scale (SIS). Patients with ED and diabetes had higher scores than the national norm in all dimensions of shame (p < 0.05), while patients with ED scored higher than the national norm in the dimensions of social exclusion, economic discrimination and internal shame (p < 0.05). Further, patients with ED and diabetes had higher scores of disease shame regarding social exclusion, internal shame and social isolation dimensions than patients with ED (p < 0.05). The score of interpersonal relationship factors of patients with ED was lower than that of the national norm (p < 0.05), while for patients with ED, the score of interpersonal relationship factors in patients’ SCL-90 was lower (p < 0.05) and the score of psychotic factors was higher than that of the national norm (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the paranoid factor score in the SCL-90 of patients with ED and diabetes, the social exclusion dimension score, and the total score in the sense of shame (p < 0.05). Both patients with ED and diabetes and patients with ED exhibited abnormally higher rates of SCL-90 scores, indicating the presence of psychological distress and urging the need to strengthen psychological care.","PeriodicalId":16360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Men's Health","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Men's Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2023.069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, although stigma and mental health among patients with diabetes have garnered significant research attention, there are still limited investigations into the stigma and mental health of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and diabetes. In this study, we aimed to examine the stigma and mental health of patients with ED and diabetes to provide insights for improving the treatment and nursing of patients with ED and diabetes. We selected 82 patients with ED and diabetes and 82 patients with ED. Patients were evaluated using the Basic Information Scale, Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Social Impact Scale (SIS). Patients with ED and diabetes had higher scores than the national norm in all dimensions of shame (p < 0.05), while patients with ED scored higher than the national norm in the dimensions of social exclusion, economic discrimination and internal shame (p < 0.05). Further, patients with ED and diabetes had higher scores of disease shame regarding social exclusion, internal shame and social isolation dimensions than patients with ED (p < 0.05). The score of interpersonal relationship factors of patients with ED was lower than that of the national norm (p < 0.05), while for patients with ED, the score of interpersonal relationship factors in patients’ SCL-90 was lower (p < 0.05) and the score of psychotic factors was higher than that of the national norm (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the paranoid factor score in the SCL-90 of patients with ED and diabetes, the social exclusion dimension score, and the total score in the sense of shame (p < 0.05). Both patients with ED and diabetes and patients with ED exhibited abnormally higher rates of SCL-90 scores, indicating the presence of psychological distress and urging the need to strengthen psychological care.
勃起功能障碍患者与勃起功能障碍合并糖尿病患者的耻辱感及心理健康状况比较研究
近年来,虽然糖尿病患者的耻辱感和心理健康已经引起了大量的研究关注,但对勃起功能障碍(ED)和糖尿病患者的耻辱感和心理健康的研究仍然有限。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨ED和糖尿病患者的耻辱感和心理健康状况,为改善ED和糖尿病患者的治疗和护理提供见解。选取ED合并糖尿病患者82例和ED患者82例,采用基本信息量表、症状自评量表(SCL-90)和社会影响量表(SIS)对患者进行评估。ED和糖尿病患者在羞耻的所有维度上的得分都高于国家标准(p <而ED患者在社会排斥、经济歧视和内在羞耻感维度得分高于全国常模(p <0.05)。此外,ED和糖尿病患者在社会排斥、内在羞耻和社会孤立维度上的疾病羞耻感得分高于ED患者(p <0.05)。ED患者人际关系因素得分低于全国常模(p <0.05),而ED患者的人际关系因素在SCL-90中的得分较低(p <0.05),精神因素得分高于全国常模(p <0.05)。ED合并糖尿病患者SCL-90偏执因子得分与社会排斥维度得分、羞耻感总分呈显著正相关(p <0.05)。ED合并糖尿病患者和ED患者的SCL-90得分均异常高,提示存在心理困扰,需要加强心理护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Men's Health
Journal of Men's Health Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
28.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JOMH is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. JOMH publishes cutting-edge advances in a wide range of diseases and conditions, including diagnostic procedures, therapeutic management strategies, and innovative clinical research in gender-based biology. It also addresses sexual disparities in health, life expectancy, lifestyle and behaviors and so on. Scientists are encouraged to publish their experimental, theoretical, and descriptive studies and observations in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信