The role of the banks' rating system in the allocation of loans

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
Slobodan Šegrt, Dragan Vučinić, Milan Mihajlović, Miodrag Radivojević
{"title":"The role of the banks' rating system in the allocation of loans","authors":"Slobodan Šegrt, Dragan Vučinić, Milan Mihajlović, Miodrag Radivojević","doi":"10.5937/intrev2302149s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this paper is the analysis of the application of banking internal credit risk measurement models for the purpose of calculating the minimum regulatory capital. The Basel Committee established proposals for an internal rating-based approach (IRB approach-internal rating-based) to capital requirements for credit risk. Such an approach, which relies on the bank's internal assessment of counterparties and exposures, can ensure two key objectives: the first is additional risk sensitivity, in which capital requirements based on internal ratings can be much more sensitive on the drivers of credit risk of economic losses in the banking portfolio; the second is incentive compatibility, where the appropriate structure of the RBI approach can provide a framework that encourages banks to continue to improve their internal risk management practices. The internal ranking approach aims to improve the safety and soundness of the financial system. The paper defines the terminology and classification of the rating system. The probability of default (PD-probability at default) and the other two risk components LGD (loss given default) and EAD (exposure at default) are key input parameters for the calculation of regulatory capital. The rating system is, therefore, a significant driver of risk management and financial performance measurement. To be in a position to demonstrate to supervisors that an internal rating system should be used for the purposes of determining minimum regulatory capital requirements, banks must first demonstrate that the rating system is an integral part of their ongoing operations and risk management culture.","PeriodicalId":43325,"journal":{"name":"International Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/intrev2302149s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the analysis of the application of banking internal credit risk measurement models for the purpose of calculating the minimum regulatory capital. The Basel Committee established proposals for an internal rating-based approach (IRB approach-internal rating-based) to capital requirements for credit risk. Such an approach, which relies on the bank's internal assessment of counterparties and exposures, can ensure two key objectives: the first is additional risk sensitivity, in which capital requirements based on internal ratings can be much more sensitive on the drivers of credit risk of economic losses in the banking portfolio; the second is incentive compatibility, where the appropriate structure of the RBI approach can provide a framework that encourages banks to continue to improve their internal risk management practices. The internal ranking approach aims to improve the safety and soundness of the financial system. The paper defines the terminology and classification of the rating system. The probability of default (PD-probability at default) and the other two risk components LGD (loss given default) and EAD (exposure at default) are key input parameters for the calculation of regulatory capital. The rating system is, therefore, a significant driver of risk management and financial performance measurement. To be in a position to demonstrate to supervisors that an internal rating system should be used for the purposes of determining minimum regulatory capital requirements, banks must first demonstrate that the rating system is an integral part of their ongoing operations and risk management culture.
银行评级系统在贷款分配中的作用
本文的主题是分析银行内部信用风险度量模型在最小监管资本计算中的应用。巴塞尔委员会提出了一种基于内部评级的方法(IRB方法-基于内部评级的方法),以满足信贷风险的资本要求。这种方法依赖于银行对交易对手和风险敞口的内部评估,可以确保两个关键目标:第一是额外的风险敏感性,即基于内部评级的资本要求,可以对银行投资组合中经济损失的信用风险驱动因素更加敏感;第二是激励兼容性,印度储备银行方法的适当结构可以提供一个框架,鼓励银行继续改进其内部风险管理实践。内部排名方法旨在提高金融体系的安全性和稳健性。本文定义了评级系统的术语和分类。违约概率(pd -违约概率)和其他两个风险组成部分LGD(违约损失)和EAD(违约风险敞口)是计算监管资本的关键输入参数。因此,评级系统是风险管理和财务绩效衡量的重要驱动因素。为了能够向监管机构证明应该使用内部评级系统来确定最低监管资本要求,银行必须首先证明评级系统是其持续运营和风险管理文化的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信