Feminism or death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet by Françoise D'Eaubonne (review)
{"title":"Feminism or death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet by Françoise D'Eaubonne (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/wfs.2023.a909492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Feminism or death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet by Françoise D'Eaubonne Miao Li D'Eaubonne, Françoise. Feminism or death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet. Ed. and Trans. Ruth Hottell. Verso, 2022. Pp. [i]-xxxii; 310. ISBN 978-1-83976-440-0. $26.95 (paper). Published in French in 1974 and appearing for the first time in English, radical feminist Françoise d'Eaubonne's Feminism or Death contends that due to the limitation of contemporary feminism that demands \"fragments\" of world management instead of wholly establishing a new humanism, ecofeminism will be the only possible salvation from the two most serious dangers facing the world: population growth and the destruction of the environment, both with a common root in \"phallocracy\"—a society dominated by males, considered superior. D'Eaubonne surveys women's conditions worldwide in actual and fictional contexts throughout history and claims the universality of misogynist discourse. Comparing women to other disadvantaged groups like Jews, black men, and the proletariat, she supposes that \"feminitude,\" or the tragic state of being a woman suffering from social, economic, and cultural discrimination (including but not limited to various forms of prostitution and rape), is caused by institutions of male domination. Biological difference, however, should not serve as a pretext for social differentiation. She then points out that the two most immediate threats of death—overpopulation and the destruction of the environment—are both rooted in the patriarchal system (and not in capitalist or socialist society) which exploits, suppresses, and destroys women's bodies as well as the natural environment. According to D'Eaubonne, the male has seized control of the soil, its fertility, and later through industry, of women's fecundity. It was logical that the overexploitation of one and the other would result in this double and paralleled peril. D'Eaubonne sees in feminist combat an issue of life or death for humans and the planet. Moving beyond the idea of revolution to a \"mutation,\" the solution of ecofeminism defeats not just phallocratism—a mental structure and political and social factor dated historically, necessitated most probably by men's takeover of agriculture, which was up until then women's domain—, but the system of power itself. She suggests contraception and abortion as a response to overpopulation and finds that the male mentality toward \"productivity\" and \"consumption\" has caused environmental destruction. The only mutation that can save the world, therefore, is the \"great upheaval\" of male power that brought about agricultural overexploitation and industrial expansion. She does not suggest a matriarchy, but rather the destruction of power by women, and finally, an egalitarian administration of a world reborn. Translated by French feminist scholar Ruth Hottell, this edition includes a foreword by Carolyn Merchant, contextualizing the work within feminist theory and recognizing its contemporary influences which confirm that the current developments of ecofeminism find their origins in the early-1970s movements from which d'Eaubonne drew and elaborated on in this book. The scholarly introduction by ecofeminists Myriam Bahaffou and Julie Gorecki values the role of ecofeminism in history while stating the limitations of the radicalistic ideas [End Page 162] presented in this book and cautioning other ecofeminist readers against patterns of thought rooted in hegemonic feminism. One may argue that certain passages, such as the simplification of disadvantaged groups to Jews, black men, homosexuals, and the proletariat, no longer reflect the current context, due to the transformations that occurred worldwide over the past fifty years. However, d'Eaubonne provides countless examples that appeared in history, whether in literature or in real life, and invites readers to consider the oppressive system that marginalizes groups based on their ethnicity, race, sexuality, religion, and so on, in a comprehensive way. Indeed, gender, social and environmental issues need to be viewed collectively especially in the contemporary context in which we face urgent issues such as climate change and a diminishing of human rights. Miao Li University of Calgary Copyright © 2023 Women in French Studies","PeriodicalId":391338,"journal":{"name":"Women in French Studies","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women in French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wfs.2023.a909492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewed by: Feminism or death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet by Françoise D'Eaubonne Miao Li D'Eaubonne, Françoise. Feminism or death: How the Women's Movement Can Save the Planet. Ed. and Trans. Ruth Hottell. Verso, 2022. Pp. [i]-xxxii; 310. ISBN 978-1-83976-440-0. $26.95 (paper). Published in French in 1974 and appearing for the first time in English, radical feminist Françoise d'Eaubonne's Feminism or Death contends that due to the limitation of contemporary feminism that demands "fragments" of world management instead of wholly establishing a new humanism, ecofeminism will be the only possible salvation from the two most serious dangers facing the world: population growth and the destruction of the environment, both with a common root in "phallocracy"—a society dominated by males, considered superior. D'Eaubonne surveys women's conditions worldwide in actual and fictional contexts throughout history and claims the universality of misogynist discourse. Comparing women to other disadvantaged groups like Jews, black men, and the proletariat, she supposes that "feminitude," or the tragic state of being a woman suffering from social, economic, and cultural discrimination (including but not limited to various forms of prostitution and rape), is caused by institutions of male domination. Biological difference, however, should not serve as a pretext for social differentiation. She then points out that the two most immediate threats of death—overpopulation and the destruction of the environment—are both rooted in the patriarchal system (and not in capitalist or socialist society) which exploits, suppresses, and destroys women's bodies as well as the natural environment. According to D'Eaubonne, the male has seized control of the soil, its fertility, and later through industry, of women's fecundity. It was logical that the overexploitation of one and the other would result in this double and paralleled peril. D'Eaubonne sees in feminist combat an issue of life or death for humans and the planet. Moving beyond the idea of revolution to a "mutation," the solution of ecofeminism defeats not just phallocratism—a mental structure and political and social factor dated historically, necessitated most probably by men's takeover of agriculture, which was up until then women's domain—, but the system of power itself. She suggests contraception and abortion as a response to overpopulation and finds that the male mentality toward "productivity" and "consumption" has caused environmental destruction. The only mutation that can save the world, therefore, is the "great upheaval" of male power that brought about agricultural overexploitation and industrial expansion. She does not suggest a matriarchy, but rather the destruction of power by women, and finally, an egalitarian administration of a world reborn. Translated by French feminist scholar Ruth Hottell, this edition includes a foreword by Carolyn Merchant, contextualizing the work within feminist theory and recognizing its contemporary influences which confirm that the current developments of ecofeminism find their origins in the early-1970s movements from which d'Eaubonne drew and elaborated on in this book. The scholarly introduction by ecofeminists Myriam Bahaffou and Julie Gorecki values the role of ecofeminism in history while stating the limitations of the radicalistic ideas [End Page 162] presented in this book and cautioning other ecofeminist readers against patterns of thought rooted in hegemonic feminism. One may argue that certain passages, such as the simplification of disadvantaged groups to Jews, black men, homosexuals, and the proletariat, no longer reflect the current context, due to the transformations that occurred worldwide over the past fifty years. However, d'Eaubonne provides countless examples that appeared in history, whether in literature or in real life, and invites readers to consider the oppressive system that marginalizes groups based on their ethnicity, race, sexuality, religion, and so on, in a comprehensive way. Indeed, gender, social and environmental issues need to be viewed collectively especially in the contemporary context in which we face urgent issues such as climate change and a diminishing of human rights. Miao Li University of Calgary Copyright © 2023 Women in French Studies
《女权主义还是死亡:妇女运动如何拯救地球》作者:弗朗索瓦丝·德奥博内(书评)
书评:《女权主义还是死亡:妇女运动如何拯救地球》作者:弗朗索瓦兹·德奥博内女权主义或死亡:妇女运动如何拯救地球。编辑和翻译。露丝Hottell。左页,2022年。页。[我]第十七届;310. ISBN 978-1-83976-440-0。26.95美元(纸)。激进女权主义者弗朗索瓦兹·德奥波恩的《女权主义还是死亡》于1974年以法文出版,首次在英文中出现,她认为,由于当代女权主义要求“碎片化”的世界管理,而不是完全建立一种新的人文主义,生态女权主义将是唯一可能的拯救世界面临的两个最严重的危险:人口增长和环境破坏都有一个共同的根源,那就是“男性统治”——一个被认为优越的男性统治的社会。D'Eaubonne调查了历史上真实和虚构的世界各地女性的状况,并声称厌恶女性的话语是普遍存在的。将女性与其他弱势群体,如犹太人、黑人男性和无产阶级进行比较,她认为“女性气质”,或女性遭受社会、经济和文化歧视(包括但不限于各种形式的卖淫和强奸)的悲惨状态,是由男性统治的制度造成的。然而,生理差异不应成为社会差异的借口。她接着指出,两个最直接的死亡威胁——人口过剩和环境破坏——都根植于父权制度(而不是资本主义或社会主义社会),这种制度剥削、压制和破坏女性的身体和自然环境。根据德奥博内的说法,男性已经控制了土壤,控制了土壤的生育能力,后来通过工业控制了女性的生育能力。对其中一种和另一种的过度开发将导致这种双重和并行的危险,这是合乎逻辑的。德奥博内认为女权主义斗争关乎人类和地球的生死问题。从革命的理念到“突变”,生态女性主义的解决方案不仅击败了男性至上主义——一种历史上的精神结构、政治和社会因素,很可能是由于男性接管了农业,而农业在那时一直是女性的领域——而且还击败了权力体系本身。她建议避孕和堕胎作为对人口过剩的回应,并发现男性对“生产力”和“消费”的心态造成了环境破坏。因此,唯一能够拯救世界的突变是男性权力的“大剧变”,它带来了农业的过度开发和工业的扩张。她并没有提出母权制,而是提出了女性对权力的破坏,并最终实现了世界重生的平等主义管理。该书由法国女权主义学者露丝·霍特尔(Ruth Hottell)翻译,由卡罗琳·麦钱特(Carolyn Merchant)作序,将该书置于女权主义理论的背景下,并认识到其对当代的影响,这些影响证实了生态女权主义的当前发展源于20世纪70年代早期的运动,德奥博内在本书中对此进行了描绘和阐述。生态女性主义者Myriam Bahaffou和Julie Gorecki的学术介绍重视生态女性主义在历史上的作用,同时指出本书中提出的激进主义思想的局限性,并警告其他生态女性主义读者反对植根于霸权女性主义的思想模式。有人可能会争辩说,由于过去五十年世界范围内发生的变化,某些段落,如将弱势群体简化为犹太人、黑人、同性恋者和无产阶级,不再反映当前的背景。然而,德奥博内提供了无数出现在历史上,无论是文学作品还是现实生活中的例子,并邀请读者全面地思考基于民族、种族、性别、宗教等因素而将群体边缘化的压迫制度。的确,性别、社会和环境问题需要集体看待,特别是在我们面临诸如气候变化和人权减少等紧迫问题的当代背景下。版权所有©2023法语研究中的女性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。