Sosyal Onay İhtiyacının Mükemmeliyetçilik, Akademik Kendini Engelleme ve Öz-Yeterlik Arasındaki İlişkiye Etkileri

Merve Ebrar KARAKAYA, Gülten ÜNAL
{"title":"Sosyal Onay İhtiyacının Mükemmeliyetçilik, Akademik Kendini Engelleme ve Öz-Yeterlik Arasındaki İlişkiye Etkileri","authors":"Merve Ebrar KARAKAYA, Gülten ÜNAL","doi":"10.32600/huefd.1143283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examining the need for social approval is critical to understand the effects of the social environment on individuals’ beliefs about themselves and perceptions of their abilities. This study aims to provide deep insight into the role and the effect of the need for social approval on the relationship between self-efficacy and perfectionism. Likewise, it aims to examine the role and the effect of the need for social approval on the relationship between self-efficacy and academic self-handicapping. In this study, academic self-handicapping, perfectionism, and the need for social approval, which are individually linked to self-efficacy, are examined in a single comprehensive framework. Participants were 121 university students studying at different universities who completed an online survey involving measures of academic self-handicapping, perfectionism, general self-efficacy, and reactions to social situations. They were manipulated by either receiving positive or negative feedback related to the need for social approval or receiving no feedback. The obtained data were tested with Pearson correlation analysis, one-way ANOVA, and moderation analysis. The findings showed that there was no significant difference between the self-efficacy scores of the groups. Self-efficacy was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with academic self-handicapping and perfectionism. The moderation analysis revealed that the relationship between academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy was only significant when participants received positive feedback or did not receive any feedback related to social approval. Contrary to expectations, the need for social approval was not found to have a moderating role in the relationship between perfectionism and self-efficacy. The current study contributes to the literature in terms of investigating the need for social approval in an experimental setting and showing that it plays a moderator role in the relationship between academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy.","PeriodicalId":30677,"journal":{"name":"Hacettepe Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hacettepe Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.1143283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining the need for social approval is critical to understand the effects of the social environment on individuals’ beliefs about themselves and perceptions of their abilities. This study aims to provide deep insight into the role and the effect of the need for social approval on the relationship between self-efficacy and perfectionism. Likewise, it aims to examine the role and the effect of the need for social approval on the relationship between self-efficacy and academic self-handicapping. In this study, academic self-handicapping, perfectionism, and the need for social approval, which are individually linked to self-efficacy, are examined in a single comprehensive framework. Participants were 121 university students studying at different universities who completed an online survey involving measures of academic self-handicapping, perfectionism, general self-efficacy, and reactions to social situations. They were manipulated by either receiving positive or negative feedback related to the need for social approval or receiving no feedback. The obtained data were tested with Pearson correlation analysis, one-way ANOVA, and moderation analysis. The findings showed that there was no significant difference between the self-efficacy scores of the groups. Self-efficacy was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with academic self-handicapping and perfectionism. The moderation analysis revealed that the relationship between academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy was only significant when participants received positive feedback or did not receive any feedback related to social approval. Contrary to expectations, the need for social approval was not found to have a moderating role in the relationship between perfectionism and self-efficacy. The current study contributes to the literature in terms of investigating the need for social approval in an experimental setting and showing that it plays a moderator role in the relationship between academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy.
需要社会认可对完美主义、学业自我抑制和自我效能之间关系的影响
研究社会认可的需求对于理解社会环境对个人对自己的信念和对自己能力的看法的影响至关重要。本研究旨在深入探讨社会认同需求在自我效能感与完美主义关系中的作用和影响。同样,研究社会认可需求在自我效能感和学业自我妨碍之间的关系中的作用和影响。在本研究中,学术自我障碍、完美主义和社会认可的需要,这是单独与自我效能相关联的,在一个单一的综合框架中进行了检查。参与者是121名在不同大学学习的大学生,他们完成了一项在线调查,包括学业自我障碍、完美主义、一般自我效能和对社交情况的反应。他们通过接受与社会认可需求相关的积极或消极反馈或不接受反馈来操纵。所得资料采用Pearson相关分析、单因素方差分析和调节分析进行检验。结果显示,两组大学生的自我效能感得分无显著差异。自我效能感与学业自我设限和完美主义呈显著负相关。适度分析显示,学业自我设限与自我效能感的关系仅在被试获得积极反馈或未获得与社会认可相关的反馈时才显著。与预期相反,对社会认可的需求并没有在完美主义和自我效能之间的关系中起到调节作用。本研究在实验环境下考察了社会认可需求,并表明社会认可需求在学业自我阻碍和自我效能之间的关系中起调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信