Crucial Clues: Investigating Psychophysiological Behaviors for Measuring Trust in Human-Robot Interaction

Muneeb Ahmad, Abdullah Alzahrani
{"title":"Crucial Clues: Investigating Psychophysiological Behaviors for Measuring Trust in Human-Robot Interaction","authors":"Muneeb Ahmad, Abdullah Alzahrani","doi":"10.1145/3577190.3614148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing work on the measurements of trust during Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) indicates that psychophysiological behaviours (PBs) have the potential to measure trust. However, we see limited work on the use of multiple PBs in combination to calibrate human’s trust in robots in real-time during HRI. Therefore, this study aims to estimate human trust in robots by examining the differences in PBs between trust and distrust states. It further investigates the changes in PBs across repeated HRI and also explores the potential of machine learning classifiers in predicting trust levels during HRI. We collected participants’ electrodermal activity (EDA), blood volume pulse (BVP), heart rate (HR), skin temperature (SKT), blinking rate (BR), and blinking duration (BD) during repeated HRI. The results showed significant differences in HR and SKT between trust and distrust groups and no significant interaction effect of session and decision for all PBs. Random Forest classifier achieved the best accuracy of 68.6% to classify trust, while SKT, HR, BR, and BD were the important features. These findings highlight the value of PBs in measuring trust in real-time during HRI and encourage further investigation of trust measures with PBs in various HRI settings.","PeriodicalId":93171,"journal":{"name":"Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","volume":"274 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3577190.3614148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing work on the measurements of trust during Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) indicates that psychophysiological behaviours (PBs) have the potential to measure trust. However, we see limited work on the use of multiple PBs in combination to calibrate human’s trust in robots in real-time during HRI. Therefore, this study aims to estimate human trust in robots by examining the differences in PBs between trust and distrust states. It further investigates the changes in PBs across repeated HRI and also explores the potential of machine learning classifiers in predicting trust levels during HRI. We collected participants’ electrodermal activity (EDA), blood volume pulse (BVP), heart rate (HR), skin temperature (SKT), blinking rate (BR), and blinking duration (BD) during repeated HRI. The results showed significant differences in HR and SKT between trust and distrust groups and no significant interaction effect of session and decision for all PBs. Random Forest classifier achieved the best accuracy of 68.6% to classify trust, while SKT, HR, BR, and BD were the important features. These findings highlight the value of PBs in measuring trust in real-time during HRI and encourage further investigation of trust measures with PBs in various HRI settings.
关键线索:调查人机交互中测量信任的心理生理行为
现有的关于人机交互信任测量的研究表明,心理生理行为(PBs)具有测量信任的潜力。然而,我们看到在HRI期间使用多个PBs组合来实时校准人类对机器人的信任方面的工作有限。因此,本研究旨在通过检查信任和不信任状态之间的PBs差异来估计人类对机器人的信任。它进一步研究了重复HRI中PBs的变化,并探索了机器学习分类器在预测HRI期间信任水平方面的潜力。我们收集了受试者在重复HRI期间的皮肤电活动(EDA)、血容量脉冲(BVP)、心率(HR)、皮肤温度(SKT)、眨眼频率(BR)和眨眼持续时间(BD)。结果显示,信任组和不信任组的HR和SKT存在显著差异,所有PBs的会话和决策没有显著的交互效应。随机森林分类器对信任的分类准确率达到68.6%,其中SKT、HR、BR和BD是重要特征。这些发现突出了PBs在HRI过程中实时测量信任的价值,并鼓励在各种HRI设置中进一步研究PBs的信任测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信