Stabilizing or destabilizing: the effect of institutional investors on stock return volatility in an emerging market

Shallu Batra, Mahender Yadav, Ishu Jindal, Mohit Saini, Pankaj Kumar
{"title":"Stabilizing or destabilizing: the effect of institutional investors on stock return volatility in an emerging market","authors":"Shallu Batra, Mahender Yadav, Ishu Jindal, Mohit Saini, Pankaj Kumar","doi":"10.1108/mbr-04-2023-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of institutional investors and their classes on the stock return volatility of an emerging market. The paper also determines the moderating role of firm size, crisis and turnover on such relationships. Design/methodology/approach The study covers nonfinancial companies of the Bombay Stock Exchange-100 index that are listed during the study period. The study uses fixed effects and systematic generalized method of moments estimators to look over the association between institutional investors and firms’ stock return volatility. Findings The study provides evidence that institutional investors destabilize the Indian stock market. It indicates that institutional investors do not engage in management activities; they earn short-term gains depending on information efficiency. Pressure-insensitive institutional investors have a significant positive relation with stock return volatility, while pressure-sensitive institutional investors do not. The study also reflects that pressure-sensitive institutional investors are underweighted in India, which jointly represents an insignificant nonlinear association between institutional ownership and stocks’ volatility. Furthermore, outcomes reveal that the intersection effect of the crisis, firm size and turnover is positively and significantly related to such relationships. Research limitations/implications The outcomes encourage initiatives that keep track of institutional investors in the Indian stock market. To control the destabilizing effect of pressure-insensitive institutional investors, regulators should follow strict regulations on their trading patterns. Moreover, it guides the potential researchers that they should also take into account the impact of other classes of ownership structure or what type of ownership can help in stabilizing or destabilizing the Indian stock market. Originality/value Abundant literature studies the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance in the Indian context. From the standpoint of making management decisions, the return and volatility of stock returns are both different aspects. However, this study examines the effect of institutional ownership and its groups on the volatility of stock return using the panel data estimator, which was previously not discussed in the literature.","PeriodicalId":108650,"journal":{"name":"The Multinational Business Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Multinational Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-04-2023-0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of institutional investors and their classes on the stock return volatility of an emerging market. The paper also determines the moderating role of firm size, crisis and turnover on such relationships. Design/methodology/approach The study covers nonfinancial companies of the Bombay Stock Exchange-100 index that are listed during the study period. The study uses fixed effects and systematic generalized method of moments estimators to look over the association between institutional investors and firms’ stock return volatility. Findings The study provides evidence that institutional investors destabilize the Indian stock market. It indicates that institutional investors do not engage in management activities; they earn short-term gains depending on information efficiency. Pressure-insensitive institutional investors have a significant positive relation with stock return volatility, while pressure-sensitive institutional investors do not. The study also reflects that pressure-sensitive institutional investors are underweighted in India, which jointly represents an insignificant nonlinear association between institutional ownership and stocks’ volatility. Furthermore, outcomes reveal that the intersection effect of the crisis, firm size and turnover is positively and significantly related to such relationships. Research limitations/implications The outcomes encourage initiatives that keep track of institutional investors in the Indian stock market. To control the destabilizing effect of pressure-insensitive institutional investors, regulators should follow strict regulations on their trading patterns. Moreover, it guides the potential researchers that they should also take into account the impact of other classes of ownership structure or what type of ownership can help in stabilizing or destabilizing the Indian stock market. Originality/value Abundant literature studies the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance in the Indian context. From the standpoint of making management decisions, the return and volatility of stock returns are both different aspects. However, this study examines the effect of institutional ownership and its groups on the volatility of stock return using the panel data estimator, which was previously not discussed in the literature.
稳定或不稳定:机构投资者对新兴市场股票收益波动的影响
本研究旨在探讨机构投资者及其类别对新兴市场股票收益波动的影响。本文还确定了企业规模、危机和流失率对这种关系的调节作用。该研究涵盖了在研究期间上市的孟买证券交易所100指数的非金融公司。本文采用固定效应和系统广义矩估计方法考察了机构投资者与公司股票收益波动之间的关系。研究结果表明,机构投资者破坏了印度股市的稳定。表明机构投资者不从事管理活动;他们根据信息效率赚取短期收益。压力不敏感的机构投资者与股票收益波动呈显著正相关,而压力敏感的机构投资者与股票收益波动无显著正相关。该研究还反映出,对压力敏感的机构投资者在印度的权重偏低,这共同表明机构持股与股票波动之间存在不显著的非线性关联。此外,研究结果显示,危机、企业规模和流动率的交叉效应与上述关系呈显著正相关。研究局限/启示研究结果鼓励了跟踪印度股市机构投资者的举措。为了控制对压力不敏感的机构投资者的不稳定效应,监管机构应该严格监管他们的交易模式。此外,它还指导潜在的研究人员,他们还应该考虑其他类型的股权结构的影响,或者哪种类型的股权有助于稳定或破坏印度股市。在印度背景下,大量文献研究了机构所有权与公司绩效之间的关系。从管理决策的角度来看,股票收益的收益和波动性是两个不同的方面。然而,本研究使用面板数据估计器检验了机构所有权及其群体对股票收益波动性的影响,这在以前的文献中没有讨论过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信