A «Tacit Consent» to Transplantation: to be оr Not to be

Kh. Ya. Tereshko
{"title":"A «Tacit Consent» to Transplantation: to be оr Not to be","authors":"Kh. Ya. Tereshko","doi":"10.25040/medicallaw2023.02.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory collisions and lacunae in the legal regulation of transplantation are highlighted. The analysis was carried out and improvement of normative acts in the outlined area was proposed. The possibility of implementing the principle of tacit consent to transplantation was investigated. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the field of application of transplantation is analyzed.
 The principle of tacit consent provides for the possibility of using any biological materials from the body of a deceased person, if the latter did not testify to their disagreement during their lifetime or the relatives of the deceased person did not make any statements regarding the prohibition of removing organs and tissues from the body of the deceased. The main idea of applying this principle in this area is to reduce the amount of time it takes to obtain the consent of the donor's relatives and, accordingly, to carry out a higher­ quality transplant to the recipient with the use of a smaller number of means to maintain the activity of this or that organ.
 The introduction of the principle of tacit consent in any country requires: firstly, a clear regulation, and secondly, it must be correlated not only with the domestic legislation of such a country, but also with international treaties ratified by this country in order to avoid misunderstandings and new precedents for the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.","PeriodicalId":91928,"journal":{"name":"Medychne pravo","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medychne pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25040/medicallaw2023.02.055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory collisions and lacunae in the legal regulation of transplantation are highlighted. The analysis was carried out and improvement of normative acts in the outlined area was proposed. The possibility of implementing the principle of tacit consent to transplantation was investigated. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the field of application of transplantation is analyzed. The principle of tacit consent provides for the possibility of using any biological materials from the body of a deceased person, if the latter did not testify to their disagreement during their lifetime or the relatives of the deceased person did not make any statements regarding the prohibition of removing organs and tissues from the body of the deceased. The main idea of applying this principle in this area is to reduce the amount of time it takes to obtain the consent of the donor's relatives and, accordingly, to carry out a higher­ quality transplant to the recipient with the use of a smaller number of means to maintain the activity of this or that organ. The introduction of the principle of tacit consent in any country requires: firstly, a clear regulation, and secondly, it must be correlated not only with the domestic legislation of such a country, but also with international treaties ratified by this country in order to avoid misunderstandings and new precedents for the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.
对移植的“默认同意”:被允许或不允许
强调了移植法律规制中的规制冲突和空白。并对上述领域的规范性行为进行了分析,提出了完善的建议。探讨了实施移植默许原则的可能性。分析了欧洲人权法院在移植适用领域的实践。 默许原则规定,如果死者生前没有证明他们不同意,或者死者亲属没有就禁止从死者身上摘取器官和组织作出任何声明,则可以使用死者尸体上的任何生物材料。在这一领域应用这一原则的主要思想是减少征得捐赠者亲属同意所需的时间,从而使用更少的手段对接受者进行更高质量的移植,以保持这个或那个器官的活性。默许原则在任何一个国家的引入,首先需要有一个明确的规定,其次不仅要与该国的国内立法相联系,而且要与该国批准的国际条约相联系,以免给欧洲人权法院的实践带来误解和新的先例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信