Exploring role transitions and conflicts on work disengagement under varying settings: the moderating role of individual resilience

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Tavleen Kaur, Santanu Mandal
{"title":"Exploring role transitions and conflicts on work disengagement under varying settings: the moderating role of individual resilience","authors":"Tavleen Kaur, Santanu Mandal","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-03-2023-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose COVID-19 disrupted the usual way of working for many people across the globe, making full-time work from home and hybrid models two popular work arrangements. Despite the proliferation and high acceptance of the hybrid model, very little research has focused on the same. This study aims to compare the impact of transitions caused by remote work on work disengagement under two settings: remote work and hybrid model. Design/methodology/approach The data is collected from three corporate hubs in India: Hyderabad, Gurgaon and Bangalore. This study’s respondents represent two working models: full-time work from home and a hybrid model. Responses were collected using Google forms-based questionnaire, which resulted in the following usable responses: 356 (hybrid) and 398 (work from home). Findings The findings reveal that the structural model for the hybrid sector explained 11% of the variance in work disengagement, while the same for work from home model accounted for 20% of the variance in work disengagement. The authors also tested for the moderation of individual resilience between work-home and home-to-work conflicts and home-to-work transitions and work-to-home conflict under full-time work-from and hybrid models. Based on 356 respondents from hybrid category and 398 from work from home, the study found that employees experience less work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts in the hybrid model and employees experience more work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts in the full-time work from home model. Originality/value The study is also the first to examine the moderating role of individual resilience as a tool to bounce back and handle conflicts. As the full-time work from home model leads to more work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts, individuals have more scope to exhibit resilience, and thus, the moderating relationship is stronger in the full-time work from home model. The paper offers theoretical and managerial implications.","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-03-2023-0046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose COVID-19 disrupted the usual way of working for many people across the globe, making full-time work from home and hybrid models two popular work arrangements. Despite the proliferation and high acceptance of the hybrid model, very little research has focused on the same. This study aims to compare the impact of transitions caused by remote work on work disengagement under two settings: remote work and hybrid model. Design/methodology/approach The data is collected from three corporate hubs in India: Hyderabad, Gurgaon and Bangalore. This study’s respondents represent two working models: full-time work from home and a hybrid model. Responses were collected using Google forms-based questionnaire, which resulted in the following usable responses: 356 (hybrid) and 398 (work from home). Findings The findings reveal that the structural model for the hybrid sector explained 11% of the variance in work disengagement, while the same for work from home model accounted for 20% of the variance in work disengagement. The authors also tested for the moderation of individual resilience between work-home and home-to-work conflicts and home-to-work transitions and work-to-home conflict under full-time work-from and hybrid models. Based on 356 respondents from hybrid category and 398 from work from home, the study found that employees experience less work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts in the hybrid model and employees experience more work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts in the full-time work from home model. Originality/value The study is also the first to examine the moderating role of individual resilience as a tool to bounce back and handle conflicts. As the full-time work from home model leads to more work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts, individuals have more scope to exhibit resilience, and thus, the moderating relationship is stronger in the full-time work from home model. The paper offers theoretical and managerial implications.
不同情境下角色转换与冲突对工作脱离投入的影响:个体弹性的调节作用
新冠肺炎疫情打破了全球许多人的正常工作方式,使全职在家工作和混合模式成为两种流行的工作安排。尽管混合模型得到了广泛的应用和高度的接受,但很少有研究关注于此。本研究旨在比较远程工作和混合模式两种情况下,远程工作带来的过渡对工作脱离感的影响。设计/方法/方法数据收集自印度的三个公司中心:海德拉巴、古尔冈和班加罗尔。这项研究的受访者代表了两种工作模式:全职在家工作和混合模式。我们使用基于谷歌表格的问卷收集反馈,得到以下可用的反馈:356个(混合型)和398个(在家工作)。研究结果显示,混合行业的结构模型解释了工作脱离的11%的差异,而在家工作的结构模型解释了工作脱离的20%的差异。作者还测试了在全职工作模式和混合模式下,工作-家庭和家庭-工作冲突以及家庭-工作过渡和工作-家庭冲突对个体弹性的调节作用。根据356名混合模式受访者和398名在家工作的受访者的调查,该研究发现,混合模式下的员工较少经历工作到家和家庭到工作的冲突,而全职在家工作模式下的员工则更多经历工作到家和家庭到工作的冲突。独创性/价值该研究也是第一个检验个人弹性作为恢复和处理冲突的工具的调节作用。由于全职工作模式导致更多的工作到家庭和家庭到工作的冲突,个体有更大的空间表现出弹性,因此,全职工作模式的调节关系更强。本文具有理论和管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信