No response? Chronemic expectancy violation and relational turbulence in technologically-mediated romantic relational conflict

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Qing Huang, Shuting Yao
{"title":"No response? Chronemic expectancy violation and relational turbulence in technologically-mediated romantic relational conflict","authors":"Qing Huang, Shuting Yao","doi":"10.1177/02654075231213824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An extensive body of literature shows how people deal with conflicts, verbally and nonverbally, in interpersonal interactions. However, the role of technologically-mediated communication (TMC) in romantic relational conflict has received less attention. Through the lenses of Relational Turbulence and Expectancy Violations Theories, this study explored how a chronemic expectancy violation from a romantic partner impacts emotional well-being in a TMC-involved conflict discussion. Two online questionnaires were distributed. First, a pilot study was conducted to understand the basic online communication dynamics between emerging adult romantic partners (e.g., usual response latency) and possible emotions when they experience a chronemic expectancy violation from their partner on TMC. Results show that people are likely to experience negative affect and other specific emotions (e.g., disillusion, loneliness, frustration, hurt, anger) if their partner takes longer than expected to respond. The main study then further explored how individuals’ expectations differ in a hypothetical TMC-involved conflict scenario where they use text-based TMC to discuss a recent romantic conflict with their partners. Participants were instructed to imagine a chronemic expectancy violation whereby their partner does not respond within their expected time period (i.e., conflict expected latency) and report their feelings about it. Results show that people expect their partners to respond more rapidly in the conflict scenario than usual and report negative feelings after the expectancy violations. Conflict-specific (e.g., seriousness), personal (e.g., attachment anxiety and avoidance), and relational (e.g., commitment) variables also influence the intensity of their emotional experiences. This research enhances comprehension of nonverbal cues in text-based TMC and potential emotional repercussions in romantic conflict management.","PeriodicalId":48288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":"26 21","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231213824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An extensive body of literature shows how people deal with conflicts, verbally and nonverbally, in interpersonal interactions. However, the role of technologically-mediated communication (TMC) in romantic relational conflict has received less attention. Through the lenses of Relational Turbulence and Expectancy Violations Theories, this study explored how a chronemic expectancy violation from a romantic partner impacts emotional well-being in a TMC-involved conflict discussion. Two online questionnaires were distributed. First, a pilot study was conducted to understand the basic online communication dynamics between emerging adult romantic partners (e.g., usual response latency) and possible emotions when they experience a chronemic expectancy violation from their partner on TMC. Results show that people are likely to experience negative affect and other specific emotions (e.g., disillusion, loneliness, frustration, hurt, anger) if their partner takes longer than expected to respond. The main study then further explored how individuals’ expectations differ in a hypothetical TMC-involved conflict scenario where they use text-based TMC to discuss a recent romantic conflict with their partners. Participants were instructed to imagine a chronemic expectancy violation whereby their partner does not respond within their expected time period (i.e., conflict expected latency) and report their feelings about it. Results show that people expect their partners to respond more rapidly in the conflict scenario than usual and report negative feelings after the expectancy violations. Conflict-specific (e.g., seriousness), personal (e.g., attachment anxiety and avoidance), and relational (e.g., commitment) variables also influence the intensity of their emotional experiences. This research enhances comprehension of nonverbal cues in text-based TMC and potential emotional repercussions in romantic conflict management.
没有反应?技术介导的浪漫关系冲突中的时间预期违反与关系动荡
大量的文献表明,在人际交往中,人们是如何处理口头和非口头冲突的。然而,技术中介沟通在恋爱关系冲突中的作用却很少受到关注。本研究通过关系动荡和期望违反理论的视角,探讨了恋爱伴侣的慢性期望违反如何影响tmc冲突讨论中的情绪幸福感。发放了两份在线问卷。首先,进行了一项初步研究,以了解新兴成人浪漫伴侣之间的基本在线交流动态(例如,通常的反应延迟)以及当他们在TMC上经历伴侣的慢性期望违反时可能出现的情绪。结果表明,如果伴侣的回应时间比预期长,人们可能会经历负面影响和其他特定情绪(如幻灭、孤独、沮丧、伤害、愤怒)。然后,主要研究进一步探讨了在假设的涉及TMC的冲突场景中,人们使用基于文本的TMC来讨论最近与伴侣的恋爱冲突,个体的期望是如何不同的。参与者被要求想象他们的伴侣没有在他们预期的时间内做出反应(即冲突预期延迟),并报告他们对此的感受。结果表明,人们期望他们的伴侣在冲突场景中比平时更快地做出反应,并在期望违反后报告负面情绪。特定冲突(如严肃性)、个人(如依恋、焦虑和回避)和关系(如承诺)变量也会影响他们情绪体验的强度。本研究提高了对基于文本的情感冲突管理中非语言线索的理解和对恋爱冲突管理中潜在情绪影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
187
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social and Personal Relationships is an international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research on social and personal relationships. JSPR is the leading journal in the field, publishing empirical and theoretical papers on social and personal relationships. It is multidisciplinary in scope, drawing material from the fields of social psychology, clinical psychology, communication, developmental psychology, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信