ACCURACY OF THE FLOW FIELD AROUND A CYLINDER FROM VARIOUS IMMERSED BOUNDARY FORMULATION

Wooseok Seo, Geunhyeok Choi, Seong-Jin Kim, Seungwon Shin
{"title":"ACCURACY OF THE FLOW FIELD AROUND A CYLINDER FROM VARIOUS IMMERSED BOUNDARY FORMULATION","authors":"Wooseok Seo, Geunhyeok Choi, Seong-Jin Kim, Seungwon Shin","doi":"10.6112/kscfe.2023.28.3.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calculating the flow field with complex geometry is one of the essential features of computational fluid dynamics. For finite volume formulation, a body fitted grid was usually utilized for such geometry. However, the immersed boundary method has become very popular these days since it can be applicable to a simple Cartesian coordinate system which uses finite difference schemes. It becomes much more effective along with two-phase flow modeling which is using continuous surface tension source formulation (CSF). There are several options for the immersed boundary techniques. Here, we are focused on the direct forcing method which is basically a ghost type approach. We tried to check the accuracy depending on forcing methods. Several forcing methods have been tested including linear velocity interpolation, stepwise or heaviside velocity filtering for the ghost nodes. We also tested a volume weighted velocity filtering approach for increased accuracy. For the benchmarking test, a flow field around the cylinder has been selected for comparison of the accuracy of different formulations.","PeriodicalId":496738,"journal":{"name":"Han'gug jeonsan yuchegong haghoeji","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'gug jeonsan yuchegong haghoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2023.28.3.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calculating the flow field with complex geometry is one of the essential features of computational fluid dynamics. For finite volume formulation, a body fitted grid was usually utilized for such geometry. However, the immersed boundary method has become very popular these days since it can be applicable to a simple Cartesian coordinate system which uses finite difference schemes. It becomes much more effective along with two-phase flow modeling which is using continuous surface tension source formulation (CSF). There are several options for the immersed boundary techniques. Here, we are focused on the direct forcing method which is basically a ghost type approach. We tried to check the accuracy depending on forcing methods. Several forcing methods have been tested including linear velocity interpolation, stepwise or heaviside velocity filtering for the ghost nodes. We also tested a volume weighted velocity filtering approach for increased accuracy. For the benchmarking test, a flow field around the cylinder has been selected for comparison of the accuracy of different formulations.
不同浸入边界公式计算圆柱周围流场的精度
复杂几何流场的计算是计算流体力学的基本特征之一。对于有限体积公式,通常采用体拟合网格。然而,浸入边界法由于可以适用于使用有限差分格式的简单笛卡尔坐标系而变得非常流行。随着采用连续表面张力源公式(CSF)的两相流建模,该方法变得更加有效。浸入式边界技术有几种选择。在这里,我们关注的是直接强迫法,这基本上是一种幽灵类型的方法。我们试图通过强迫方法来检验其准确性。已经测试了几种强制方法,包括线性速度插值,逐步或重面速度滤波的幽灵节点。我们还测试了体积加权速度滤波方法,以提高准确性。在基准测试中,选择了一个气缸周围的流场来比较不同配方的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信