Absorbency Analysis of Commercially Available Incontinence Pads

Su-Joung Cha
{"title":"Absorbency Analysis of Commercially Available Incontinence Pads","authors":"Su-Joung Cha","doi":"10.16885/jktc.2023.9.26.3.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to measure the maximum absorption, regurgitation, and leakage of commercially available pads for urine incontinence in Korea to obtain the essential data needed to develop an incontinence pad to absorb urine effectively. After measuring the maximum absorption of seven commercially available incontinence pads, it was analyzed that product B had the highest maximum absorption and product F had the lowest. The product with the highest absorption was 298.27g, and the lowest was 67.65g, a difference of 230.62g. After measuring the backflow of commercially available incontinence pads, it was analyzed that product A has the least backflow and product F has the most backflow. As a result of measuring the leakage time and leakage amount of commercially available incontinence pads, product F started leaking the fastest with leakage from 50.00ml injection, and the leakage amount was the highest at 16.06g. The timing of the leak and the amount of leakage were negatively correlated, meaning that the later the leak, the less the leakage. The considerable variation in maximum absorbency between products, even when labeled as medium and normal, suggests that consumers need clarification on the criteria for choosing incontinence pads.","PeriodicalId":500694,"journal":{"name":"Hanbog munhwa","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hanbog munhwa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16885/jktc.2023.9.26.3.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to measure the maximum absorption, regurgitation, and leakage of commercially available pads for urine incontinence in Korea to obtain the essential data needed to develop an incontinence pad to absorb urine effectively. After measuring the maximum absorption of seven commercially available incontinence pads, it was analyzed that product B had the highest maximum absorption and product F had the lowest. The product with the highest absorption was 298.27g, and the lowest was 67.65g, a difference of 230.62g. After measuring the backflow of commercially available incontinence pads, it was analyzed that product A has the least backflow and product F has the most backflow. As a result of measuring the leakage time and leakage amount of commercially available incontinence pads, product F started leaking the fastest with leakage from 50.00ml injection, and the leakage amount was the highest at 16.06g. The timing of the leak and the amount of leakage were negatively correlated, meaning that the later the leak, the less the leakage. The considerable variation in maximum absorbency between products, even when labeled as medium and normal, suggests that consumers need clarification on the criteria for choosing incontinence pads.
市售尿失禁垫的吸光度分析
本研究旨在测量韩国市售尿失禁垫的最大吸收、反流和泄漏,以获得开发有效吸收尿液的尿失禁垫所需的基本数据。在测量了7种市售的尿失禁垫的最大吸收率后,分析了产品B的最大吸收率最高,产品F的最大吸收率最低。所得产品吸光度最高为298.27g,最低为67.65g,相差230.62g。在测量市售失禁垫的回流量后,分析产品A的回流量最小,产品F的回流量最大。通过对市售失禁垫的泄漏时间和泄漏量的测量,产品F从50.00ml开始泄漏,泄漏速度最快,16.06g时泄漏量最大。泄漏的时间和泄漏量呈负相关,这意味着泄漏越晚,泄漏越少。不同产品之间的最大吸收能力差异很大,即使被标记为中等和正常,这表明消费者需要澄清选择失禁垫的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信