Did the COVID-19 pandemic change internal rural migration patterns in Serbia?

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Vesna Lukić, Suzana Lović Obradović, Jelena Stojilković Gnjatović
{"title":"Did the COVID-19 pandemic change internal rural migration patterns in Serbia?","authors":"Vesna Lukić, Suzana Lović Obradović, Jelena Stojilković Gnjatović","doi":"10.3112/erdkunde.2023.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent empirical research on internal migration has focused on the change in migration volume, before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, by the degree of urbanization. Less is known about the types of rural areas that are attracting internal migrants. This study aims to explore the changes in internal rural migration patterns in Serbia due to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the types of rural settlements as places of destinations and types of urban settlements as places of the origin of migrants. Relying on the additionally processed official national annual statistical data for the period 2018–2021, we offer findings on the differences in volume and socio-demographic characteristics of migrants across six internal migration flows (from small towns, medium-sized towns, and large cities, to suburban and non-suburban rural settlements). The results reveal that the pandemic affected an increase of rural–rural migration as well as rural in-migration from medium-sized towns. We also find that after an initial drop in values for in- and out-migration rates in 2020, relocation intensity exceeded the pre-pandemic level in 2021, with a positive net migration rate for all age groups except 15–30. The unfavorable economic characteristics of rural in-migrants shifted slightly in pandemic years since the share of active and population with personal means rose in non-suburban settlements, while the percentage of dependent population decreased. The opposite holds for suburban settlements.","PeriodicalId":11917,"journal":{"name":"Erdkunde","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erdkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2023.03.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent empirical research on internal migration has focused on the change in migration volume, before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, by the degree of urbanization. Less is known about the types of rural areas that are attracting internal migrants. This study aims to explore the changes in internal rural migration patterns in Serbia due to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the types of rural settlements as places of destinations and types of urban settlements as places of the origin of migrants. Relying on the additionally processed official national annual statistical data for the period 2018–2021, we offer findings on the differences in volume and socio-demographic characteristics of migrants across six internal migration flows (from small towns, medium-sized towns, and large cities, to suburban and non-suburban rural settlements). The results reveal that the pandemic affected an increase of rural–rural migration as well as rural in-migration from medium-sized towns. We also find that after an initial drop in values for in- and out-migration rates in 2020, relocation intensity exceeded the pre-pandemic level in 2021, with a positive net migration rate for all age groups except 15–30. The unfavorable economic characteristics of rural in-migrants shifted slightly in pandemic years since the share of active and population with personal means rose in non-suburban settlements, while the percentage of dependent population decreased. The opposite holds for suburban settlements.
COVID-19大流行是否改变了塞尔维亚的内部农村移民模式?
近期关于国内移民的实证研究主要关注新冠肺炎疫情爆发前后移民数量随城市化程度的变化。人们对吸引国内移民的农村地区类型知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨2019冠状病毒病大流行对塞尔维亚国内农村移民模式的影响,重点关注作为移民目的地的农村定居点类型和作为移民来源地的城市定居点类型。根据2018-2021年期间额外处理的官方国家年度统计数据,我们提供了六个内部移民流(从小城镇、中型城镇和大城市,到郊区和非郊区农村定居点)的移民数量和社会人口特征差异的研究结果。结果表明,大流行影响了农村向农村迁移和中等城镇向农村迁移的增加。我们还发现,在2020年迁入和迁出的移民率最初下降之后,2021年的迁移强度超过了大流行前的水平,除15-30岁外,所有年龄组的净移民率都为正。在大流行年份,农村移民的不利经济特征略有变化,因为在非郊区定居点,有经济能力的活跃人口比例上升,而依赖人口比例下降。郊区定居点的情况正好相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Erdkunde
Erdkunde 地学-自然地理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since foundation by Carl Troll in 1947, ''ERDKUNDE – Archive for Scientific Geography'' has established as a successful international journal of geography. ERDKUNDE publishes scientific articles covering the whole range of physical and human geography. The journal offers state of the art reports on recent trends and developments in specific fields of geography and comprehensive and critical reviews of new geographical publications. All manuscripts are subject to a peer-review procedure prior to publication. High quality cartography and regular large sized supplements are prominent features of ERDKUNDE, as well as standard coloured figures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信