Impact of Anti-VEGF Treatment for Diabetic Macular Oedema on Progression to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Data-driven Insights from a Multicentre Study

Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Tjebo FC Heeren, Assaf Rozenberg, Darren Thomas, Alasdair N Warwick, Taha Somroo, Abdulrahman H Alsaedi, Roy Schwartz, Usha Chakravarthy, Haralabos Eleftheriadis, Ashish Patwardhan, Faruque Ghanchi, Paul Taylor, Adnan Tufail, Catherine Egan
{"title":"Impact of Anti-VEGF Treatment for Diabetic Macular Oedema on Progression to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Data-driven Insights from a Multicentre Study","authors":"Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Tjebo FC Heeren, Assaf Rozenberg, Darren Thomas, Alasdair N Warwick, Taha Somroo, Abdulrahman H Alsaedi, Roy Schwartz, Usha Chakravarthy, Haralabos Eleftheriadis, Ashish Patwardhan, Faruque Ghanchi, Paul Taylor, Adnan Tufail, Catherine Egan","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.10.23298261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To report insights on proliferative-diabetic-retinopathy (PDR) risk modification with repeated anti-vascular endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) injections for the treatment of diabetic-macular-oedema (DMO) in routine care, and present data-driven PDR screening recommendations for injection clinics. Methods: Multicentre study (27 UK-NHS centres) of patients with non-PDR with and without DMO. Primary outcome was PDR development. Repeated anti-VEGF injections were modelled as time-dependent covariates using Cox regression and weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) adjusting for baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) grade, age, sex, ethnicity, type of diabetes, and deprivation. A propensity score matched cohort was used to estimate the treatment effect on PDR incidence rates (IR). Results: We included 5716 NPDR eyes (5716 patients, 2858 DMO eyes). The WCE method showed a better model fit. Anti-VEGF injections showed a protective effect on risk of PDR during the most recent 4-weeks from exposure which rapidly decreased. There was a 20% reduction in risk of PDR (p0.006) in treated eyes. Severe-NPDR had a 4.6-fold increase in PDR hazards when compared with mild-NPDR (p<0.001). The annual IR of untreated mild-NPDR cases was 2.3 [95%CI 1.57-3.23] per 100 person-years). In NPDR DMO cases treated with anti-VEGF, similar IR would occur with annual review for mild, 6-monthly for moderate, and 3-monthly for severe-NPDR. Conclusion: The WCE method is a better modelling strategy than traditional Cox models for repeated exposures in ophthalmology. Injections are protective against PDR predominantly within the most recent 4 weeks. Based on observed data, we suggest follow-up recommendations for PDR detection according to retinopathy grade at first injection.","PeriodicalId":478577,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","volume":"5 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.10.23298261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To report insights on proliferative-diabetic-retinopathy (PDR) risk modification with repeated anti-vascular endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) injections for the treatment of diabetic-macular-oedema (DMO) in routine care, and present data-driven PDR screening recommendations for injection clinics. Methods: Multicentre study (27 UK-NHS centres) of patients with non-PDR with and without DMO. Primary outcome was PDR development. Repeated anti-VEGF injections were modelled as time-dependent covariates using Cox regression and weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) adjusting for baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) grade, age, sex, ethnicity, type of diabetes, and deprivation. A propensity score matched cohort was used to estimate the treatment effect on PDR incidence rates (IR). Results: We included 5716 NPDR eyes (5716 patients, 2858 DMO eyes). The WCE method showed a better model fit. Anti-VEGF injections showed a protective effect on risk of PDR during the most recent 4-weeks from exposure which rapidly decreased. There was a 20% reduction in risk of PDR (p0.006) in treated eyes. Severe-NPDR had a 4.6-fold increase in PDR hazards when compared with mild-NPDR (p<0.001). The annual IR of untreated mild-NPDR cases was 2.3 [95%CI 1.57-3.23] per 100 person-years). In NPDR DMO cases treated with anti-VEGF, similar IR would occur with annual review for mild, 6-monthly for moderate, and 3-monthly for severe-NPDR. Conclusion: The WCE method is a better modelling strategy than traditional Cox models for repeated exposures in ophthalmology. Injections are protective against PDR predominantly within the most recent 4 weeks. Based on observed data, we suggest follow-up recommendations for PDR detection according to retinopathy grade at first injection.
抗vegf治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿对进展为增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的影响:来自多中心研究的数据驱动见解
背景:报告常规护理中反复注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)的增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)风险降低的见解,并为注射诊所提供数据驱动的PDR筛查建议。方法:多中心研究(27个UK-NHS中心)非pdr合并和不合并DMO患者。主要结局是PDR的发展。使用Cox回归和加权累积暴露(WCE)对基线糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)等级、年龄、性别、种族、糖尿病类型和剥夺进行调整,将重复抗vegf注射建模为时间相关协变量。使用倾向评分匹配队列来估计治疗对PDR发病率(IR)的影响。结果:我们纳入了5716只NPDR眼(5716例患者,2858只DMO眼)。WCE方法具有较好的模型拟合效果。抗vegf注射在暴露后的最近4周内显示出对PDR风险的保护作用,并迅速下降。治疗后的眼睛PDR风险降低了20% (p0.006)。与轻度npdr相比,重度npdr的PDR风险增加了4.6倍(p<0.001)。未经治疗的轻度npdr病例的年IR为2.3 / 100人年(95%CI 1.57-3.23)。在接受抗vegf治疗的NPDR DMO病例中,轻度的每年检查一次,中度的6个月,重度NPDR的3个月也会出现类似的IR。结论:WCE方法是一种较传统Cox模型更好的眼科重复暴露建模策略。注射主要在最近4周内对PDR具有保护作用。根据观察到的数据,我们建议根据首次注射时视网膜病变的等级进行PDR检测的随访建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信