Strengths and weaknesses: clinician assessment effect on substance use treatment engagement and discharge

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Ann Cherie Carter, Cory B. Dennis
{"title":"Strengths and weaknesses: clinician assessment effect on substance use treatment engagement and discharge","authors":"Ann Cherie Carter, Cory B. Dennis","doi":"10.1080/1533256x.2023.2275063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSubstance use treatment is aimed at improving the well-being of the receiving clients. Given the clinician–client interactions inherent in treatment, understanding clinician influence on treatment outcomes is important. Utilizing clinical data mining, we used existing data from the clinical files of 444 clients who received substance use day treatment. Using multinomial logistic regression and linear regression, we examined whether and which client strengths and weaknesses perceived and recorded by clinicians during a client’s assessment predict client engagement and treatment completion. The results showed that willingness to seek treatment and outside support increased the likelihood of completing treatment, while financial support decreased it. We also found that clinician perceptions of a client’s inability to benefit from treatment predicted low levels of engagement in treatment. We then discuss implications for social work of this study.KEYWORDS: Clinical data miningdischargeengagementstrengthssubstance use treatmentweaknesses Disclosure statementDuring the time of data collection and for a short time afterward, the second author was paid by the organization where the data came from to provide clinical supervision and to consult on occasion. Further, the owner and president at the time of data collection were family relatives. The organization is now under new ownership. There is no financial gain or other incentive tied to the study reported in this manuscript. The study is independent of the clinical support he was paid to provide.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Brigham Young University, Office of Research & Creative Activities, Mentoring Environment Grants.","PeriodicalId":45598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256x.2023.2275063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTSubstance use treatment is aimed at improving the well-being of the receiving clients. Given the clinician–client interactions inherent in treatment, understanding clinician influence on treatment outcomes is important. Utilizing clinical data mining, we used existing data from the clinical files of 444 clients who received substance use day treatment. Using multinomial logistic regression and linear regression, we examined whether and which client strengths and weaknesses perceived and recorded by clinicians during a client’s assessment predict client engagement and treatment completion. The results showed that willingness to seek treatment and outside support increased the likelihood of completing treatment, while financial support decreased it. We also found that clinician perceptions of a client’s inability to benefit from treatment predicted low levels of engagement in treatment. We then discuss implications for social work of this study.KEYWORDS: Clinical data miningdischargeengagementstrengthssubstance use treatmentweaknesses Disclosure statementDuring the time of data collection and for a short time afterward, the second author was paid by the organization where the data came from to provide clinical supervision and to consult on occasion. Further, the owner and president at the time of data collection were family relatives. The organization is now under new ownership. There is no financial gain or other incentive tied to the study reported in this manuscript. The study is independent of the clinical support he was paid to provide.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Brigham Young University, Office of Research & Creative Activities, Mentoring Environment Grants.
优势与劣势:临床医生评估对药物使用治疗参与和出院的影响
【摘要】药物滥用治疗的目的是改善治疗对象的幸福感。鉴于治疗中固有的医患互动,了解临床医生对治疗结果的影响是很重要的。利用临床数据挖掘,我们使用了444名接受药物使用日治疗的客户的临床文件中的现有数据。使用多项逻辑回归和线性回归,我们检查了临床医生在客户评估期间感知和记录的客户优势和劣势是否以及哪些可以预测客户参与和治疗完成。结果表明,寻求治疗和外界支持的意愿增加了完成治疗的可能性,而经济支持则降低了完成治疗的可能性。我们还发现,临床医生认为患者无法从治疗中获益,这预示着患者对治疗的参与度较低。然后讨论了本研究对社会工作的启示。关键词:临床数据挖掘出院参与优势物质使用治疗弱点披露声明在数据收集期间和之后的短时间内,第二作者由数据来源机构支付报酬,提供临床监督并偶尔进行咨询。此外,在数据收集时,所有者和总裁是家庭亲属。这个组织现在换了新主人。没有经济利益或其他激励与本论文中报告的研究相关。这项研究独立于他受雇提供的临床支持。本研究得到了杨百翰大学研究与创新活动办公室、指导环境基金的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions is designed to help social work practitioners stay abreast of the latest developments in the field of addictions. This journal publishes refereed articles on innovative individual, family, group work, and community practice models for treating and preventing substance abuse and other addictions in diverse populations. The journal focuses on research findings, health care, social policies, and program administration directly affecting social work practice in the addictions. The Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions has several regular features of interest to social workers in the field of addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信