Examining the Joint Factor Structure of Mania, Internalizing, and Thought Disorder Symptoms in a Large Online Sample

Kasey Stanton, Janan Mostajabi, Warner Myntti, Liana Willis, Juyoung Yun, Hanna Osborne, Kasidee L. Brewer
{"title":"Examining the Joint Factor Structure of Mania, Internalizing, and Thought Disorder Symptoms in a Large Online Sample","authors":"Kasey Stanton, Janan Mostajabi, Warner Myntti, Liana Willis, Juyoung Yun, Hanna Osborne, Kasidee L. Brewer","doi":"10.55913/joep.v1i1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimal classification of mania symptoms within dimensional models of psychopathology remains unclear, due in part to most prior research using composite categorical ratings of mania/bipolar disorder rather than ratings of specific symptoms. We addressed this gap by examining the structure of self-reported symptom-level ratings of mania, internalizing, and thought disorder in adults (N = 1,112) recruited online who self-identified as having significant mental health histories. Although prior research suggests that mania symptoms overlap strongly with both internalizing and thought disorder, our results indicated much closer alignment with thought disorder than internalizing when examining a two-factor structure. Even when examining a three-factor structure, manic symptoms such as grandiosity loaded strongly onto a common factor with positive psychosis symptoms. However, symptoms such as racing thoughts and excessive energy loaded strongly onto a separate Agitation factor potentially representing a subspectrum within thought disorder. Agitation showed some unique correlates (e.g., with stimulant medication use), indicating heterogeneity within the broader thought disorder spectrum. Future directions extending this research include incorporating assessment of other psychopathology (e.g., externalizing), examining the cross-method consistency of results (e.g., when using interviews), and determining symptom course and interrelations using intensive longitudinal designs.","PeriodicalId":73729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55913/joep.v1i1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal classification of mania symptoms within dimensional models of psychopathology remains unclear, due in part to most prior research using composite categorical ratings of mania/bipolar disorder rather than ratings of specific symptoms. We addressed this gap by examining the structure of self-reported symptom-level ratings of mania, internalizing, and thought disorder in adults (N = 1,112) recruited online who self-identified as having significant mental health histories. Although prior research suggests that mania symptoms overlap strongly with both internalizing and thought disorder, our results indicated much closer alignment with thought disorder than internalizing when examining a two-factor structure. Even when examining a three-factor structure, manic symptoms such as grandiosity loaded strongly onto a common factor with positive psychosis symptoms. However, symptoms such as racing thoughts and excessive energy loaded strongly onto a separate Agitation factor potentially representing a subspectrum within thought disorder. Agitation showed some unique correlates (e.g., with stimulant medication use), indicating heterogeneity within the broader thought disorder spectrum. Future directions extending this research include incorporating assessment of other psychopathology (e.g., externalizing), examining the cross-method consistency of results (e.g., when using interviews), and determining symptom course and interrelations using intensive longitudinal designs.
在一个大型在线样本中检查躁狂、内化和思维障碍症状的联合因素结构
在精神病理学的维度模型中,躁狂症状的最佳分类仍然不清楚,部分原因是大多数先前的研究使用躁狂/双相情感障碍的复合分类评级,而不是特定症状的评级。我们通过检查在线招募的自认为有显著精神健康史的成人(N = 1112)的躁狂、内化和思维障碍自我报告的症状水平评级结构来解决这一差距。虽然先前的研究表明躁狂症状与内化和思维障碍都有强烈的重叠,但我们的结果表明,在检查双因素结构时,躁狂症状与思维障碍的关系比内化更密切。即使在检查三因素结构时,狂妄等躁狂症状也强烈地与阳性精神病症状的共同因素相关联。然而,诸如思维敏捷和过度能量等症状被强烈地加载到一个单独的躁动因素上,可能代表了思维障碍的一个子谱。躁动表现出一些独特的相关性(例如,与兴奋剂药物的使用有关),表明在更广泛的思维障碍谱系中存在异质性。本研究的未来发展方向包括纳入其他精神病理的评估(例如,外化),检查结果的跨方法一致性(例如,当使用访谈时),并使用密集的纵向设计确定症状过程和相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信