Evaluation of radon mitigation systems in 14 houses over a two-year period.

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学
R J Prill, W J Fisk, B H Turk
{"title":"Evaluation of radon mitigation systems in 14 houses over a two-year period.","authors":"R J Prill,&nbsp;W J Fisk,&nbsp;B H Turk","doi":"10.1080/10473289.1990.10466719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fourteen single-family detached houses in Spokane, Washington, and Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, were monitored for two years after high concentrations of indoor radon had been mitigated. Each house was monitored quarterly using mailed alpha-track radon detectors deployed in each zone of the structure. To assess performance of mitigation systems during the second heating season after mitigation, radon concentrations in seven houses were monitored continuously for several weeks, mitigation systems in all houses were inspected, and selected other measurements were taken. In addition, occupants were also interviewed regarding their maintenance, operation, and subjective evaluation of the radon mitigation systems. Quarterly alpha-track measurements showed that radon levels had increased in most of the homes during many follow-up measurement periods when compared with concentrations measured immediately after mitigation. Mitigation-system performance was adversely affected by (1) accumulated outdoor debris blocking the outlets of subsurface pressurization pipes; (2) fans being turned off (e.g., because of excessive noise or vibration); (3) air-to-air heat exchanger, basement pressurization, and subsurface ventilation fans being turned off and fan speeds reduced; and (4) crawl-space vents being closed or sealed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","volume":"40 5","pages":"740-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466719","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Fourteen single-family detached houses in Spokane, Washington, and Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, were monitored for two years after high concentrations of indoor radon had been mitigated. Each house was monitored quarterly using mailed alpha-track radon detectors deployed in each zone of the structure. To assess performance of mitigation systems during the second heating season after mitigation, radon concentrations in seven houses were monitored continuously for several weeks, mitigation systems in all houses were inspected, and selected other measurements were taken. In addition, occupants were also interviewed regarding their maintenance, operation, and subjective evaluation of the radon mitigation systems. Quarterly alpha-track measurements showed that radon levels had increased in most of the homes during many follow-up measurement periods when compared with concentrations measured immediately after mitigation. Mitigation-system performance was adversely affected by (1) accumulated outdoor debris blocking the outlets of subsurface pressurization pipes; (2) fans being turned off (e.g., because of excessive noise or vibration); (3) air-to-air heat exchanger, basement pressurization, and subsurface ventilation fans being turned off and fan speeds reduced; and (4) crawl-space vents being closed or sealed.

在两年期间对14所房屋的氡减缓系统进行评价。
华盛顿州斯波坎市和爱达荷州科达伦市的14栋独户独立住宅在室内高浓度氡得到缓解后进行了为期两年的监测。每栋房屋每季度都使用部署在结构每个区域的邮寄α轨道氡探测器进行监测。为了评估缓解后第二个供暖季缓解系统的性能,对7所房屋的氡浓度进行了数周的连续监测,对所有房屋的缓解系统进行了检查,并采取了选定的其他测量措施。此外,还对居住者进行了访谈,内容涉及他们对氡减缓系统的维护、操作和主观评价。季度α轨道测量表明,与缓解措施后立即测量的浓度相比,在许多后续测量期间,大多数家庭的氡水平有所增加。缓解系统的性能受到以下因素的不利影响:(1)室外碎屑堆积堵塞地下加压管道出口;(2)风扇关闭(如噪音过大或震动过大);(3)空气换热器,地下室加压,关闭地下通风机,降低风机转速;(4)爬行空间通风口封闭或密封。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (J&AWMA) is one of the oldest continuously published, peer-reviewed, technical environmental journals in the world. First published in 1951 under the name Air Repair, J&AWMA is intended to serve those occupationally involved in air pollution control and waste management through the publication of timely and reliable information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信