Inequality and Social Distancing during the Pandemic

Caitlin Brown, Martin Ravallion
{"title":"Inequality and Social Distancing during the Pandemic","authors":"Caitlin Brown, Martin Ravallion","doi":"10.1007/s10888-023-09590-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We study how pre-pandemic inequalities in the United States influenced social distancing over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Richer counties tended to see more protective mobility responses in the initial (pre-pharmaceutical) phase, but less protective responses later. Near linearity of this income effect implies that inequality between counties contributed very little to overall mobility reductions. By contrast, higher within-county inequality and/or poverty came with substantially larger attenuations to non-residential mobility at given average incomes. There were also significant effects of the county’s racial and age composition. County employment composition is found to be additionally important, with reductions in mobility in counties with a higher share of professional workers.","PeriodicalId":284513,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Economic Inequality","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Economic Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-023-09590-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We study how pre-pandemic inequalities in the United States influenced social distancing over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Richer counties tended to see more protective mobility responses in the initial (pre-pharmaceutical) phase, but less protective responses later. Near linearity of this income effect implies that inequality between counties contributed very little to overall mobility reductions. By contrast, higher within-county inequality and/or poverty came with substantially larger attenuations to non-residential mobility at given average incomes. There were also significant effects of the county’s racial and age composition. County employment composition is found to be additionally important, with reductions in mobility in counties with a higher share of professional workers.
大流行期间的不平等和社会距离
我们研究了美国大流行前的不平等如何影响COVID-19大流行期间的社会距离。较富裕的国家倾向于在初始(药物前)阶段看到更多的保护性流动反应,但随后的保护性反应较少。这种收入效应的近似线性表明,县与县之间的不平等对总体流动性减少的贡献很小。相比之下,在给定的平均收入下,县内不平等和/或贫困加剧,非住宅流动性的衰减幅度也要大得多。该县的种族和年龄构成也有显著影响。研究发现,县的就业构成也很重要,专业工人比例较高的县的流动性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信