Introspection in Group Minds, Disunities of Consciousness, and Indiscrete Persons

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Eric Schwitzgebel, Sophie R. Nelson
{"title":"Introspection in Group Minds, Disunities of Consciousness, and Indiscrete Persons","authors":"Eric Schwitzgebel, Sophie R. Nelson","doi":"10.53765/20512201.30.9.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kammerer and Frankish (this issue) challenge us to expand our conception of introspection beyond neurotypical human cases. This article describes a possible 'ancillary mind' modelled on a system envisioned in Leckie's (2013) science fiction novel Ancillary Justice . The ancillary mind constitutes a borderline case between a communicating group of individuals and a single, spatially distributed mind. It occupies a grey zone with respect to personal identity and subject individuation, neither determinately one person or subject nor determinately many persons or subjects, and thus some of its processes might be neither determinately introspection within a mind nor determinately communication between minds. If ancillary minds defy discrete countability, the same might be true for some actual minds on Earth. Kammerer and Frankish's research programme can be extended to include not only the study of possible forms of introspection, but also the study of possible mental activity intermediate between introspection and communication.","PeriodicalId":47796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.30.9.188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Kammerer and Frankish (this issue) challenge us to expand our conception of introspection beyond neurotypical human cases. This article describes a possible 'ancillary mind' modelled on a system envisioned in Leckie's (2013) science fiction novel Ancillary Justice . The ancillary mind constitutes a borderline case between a communicating group of individuals and a single, spatially distributed mind. It occupies a grey zone with respect to personal identity and subject individuation, neither determinately one person or subject nor determinately many persons or subjects, and thus some of its processes might be neither determinately introspection within a mind nor determinately communication between minds. If ancillary minds defy discrete countability, the same might be true for some actual minds on Earth. Kammerer and Frankish's research programme can be extended to include not only the study of possible forms of introspection, but also the study of possible mental activity intermediate between introspection and communication.
群体心理的内省,意识的不统一,和不离散的人
Kammerer和Frankish(本期)挑战我们将内省的概念扩展到神经典型的人类案例之外。这篇文章描述了一种可能的“辅助思维”,它以Leckie(2013)的科幻小说《辅助司法》(auxiliary Justice)中设想的系统为模型。辅助思维构成了一种介于交流的个体群体和单一的、空间分布的思维之间的边界情况。它在个人身份和主体个性化方面处于灰色地带,既不确定是一个人或主体,也不确定是许多人或主体,因此它的一些过程可能既不是心灵内部的决定性内省,也不是心灵之间的决定性交流。如果辅助思维违背离散可数性,那么地球上的一些实际思维可能也是如此。Kammerer和Frankish的研究项目可以扩展到不仅包括对内省的可能形式的研究,还包括对内省和交流之间可能的心理活动的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信