Intersection of Traditional Religious Authority and New Authority in the Digital Space of Indonesia

Nikmah Lubis
{"title":"Intersection of Traditional Religious Authority and New Authority in the Digital Space of Indonesia","authors":"Nikmah Lubis","doi":"10.21043/fikrah.v11i1.19678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span lang=\"EN-US\">The emergence of new media, such as social media, has provided a space for religious communities or groups to create religious narratives or religious discourses in the digital realm. Religion is represented in a more contemporary manner, supported by advanced information technologies, packaged, and reproduced in a more modern style. Religious discourse in the digital space has thus made religious authority fluid and complex, no longer rigid and solely held by religious institutions. This condition has given rise to what is known as online authority. Online authority, in the early studies of digital religious authority, is considered by several scholars to potentially shift the existence and legitimacy of traditional authorities that have been in existence for a longer period. Traditional authority is deemed unable to adapt to digital practices. Through a literature review approach, this paper concludes that traditional and online authority are not separate entities; traditional authority can enter and exist in the online domain with packaging, styles, and innovations that align with digital practices. Traditional authority, with its strong legitimacy, is capable of presenting itself in the online domain, being repackaged and represented in ways or styles that are in line with contemporary and modern trends.</span><p> </p>","PeriodicalId":31634,"journal":{"name":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v11i1.19678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of new media, such as social media, has provided a space for religious communities or groups to create religious narratives or religious discourses in the digital realm. Religion is represented in a more contemporary manner, supported by advanced information technologies, packaged, and reproduced in a more modern style. Religious discourse in the digital space has thus made religious authority fluid and complex, no longer rigid and solely held by religious institutions. This condition has given rise to what is known as online authority. Online authority, in the early studies of digital religious authority, is considered by several scholars to potentially shift the existence and legitimacy of traditional authorities that have been in existence for a longer period. Traditional authority is deemed unable to adapt to digital practices. Through a literature review approach, this paper concludes that traditional and online authority are not separate entities; traditional authority can enter and exist in the online domain with packaging, styles, and innovations that align with digital practices. Traditional authority, with its strong legitimacy, is capable of presenting itself in the online domain, being repackaged and represented in ways or styles that are in line with contemporary and modern trends.

传统宗教权威与新权威在印尼数位空间的交集
<span lang="EN-US">社交媒体等新媒体的出现,为宗教团体或团体在数字领域创造宗教叙事或宗教话语提供了空间。宗教以更现代的方式呈现,以先进的信息技术为支撑,以更现代的方式包装和复制。因此,数字空间中的宗教话语使宗教权威变得流动和复杂,不再是僵化的,仅仅由宗教机构持有。这种情况产生了所谓的在线权威。在数字宗教权威的早期研究中,一些学者认为在线权威可能会改变已经存在较长时间的传统权威的存在和合法性。传统权威被认为无法适应数字化实践。通过文献综述的方法,本文得出结论:传统权威和网络权威不是独立的实体;传统权威可以通过与数字实践相一致的包装、风格和创新进入并存在于在线领域。传统权威凭借其强大的合法性,能够在网络领域中呈现自己,并以符合当代和现代趋势的方式或风格进行重新包装和表现。</span><p>& lt; / p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信