{"title":"DMA begins","authors":"Giuseppe Colangelo","doi":"10.1093/jaenfo/jnac033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 2022 of 12 October marks the official birth of the Digital Markets Act (DMA).1 As with the General Data Protection Regulation,2 the European Union sets itself as a forerunner in digital economy rulemaking, attempting to strengthen its global regulatory leadership, through the so-called and well-described Brussels effect.3 The new Regulation is, indeed, complemented by other relevant interventions addressing the role of data and digital intermediaries such as the Data Governance Act,4 the Digital Services Act,5 and the proposal for a Data Act,6 which will shape the European digital policy. Against the emergence of large online platforms, several proposals have been advanced by policymakers around the world to tame digital gatekeepers, including public utilities-style regulations, break-ups, bans on vertical integration, and reforms of competition laws.7 Despite such different approaches, however, the envisaged solutions share the same premise, namely the urgent need for bespoke interventions because of the distrust towards current antitrust rules to face effectively the challenges of the brave new world.","PeriodicalId":42471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antitrust Enforcement","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antitrust Enforcement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnac033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The year 2022 of 12 October marks the official birth of the Digital Markets Act (DMA).1 As with the General Data Protection Regulation,2 the European Union sets itself as a forerunner in digital economy rulemaking, attempting to strengthen its global regulatory leadership, through the so-called and well-described Brussels effect.3 The new Regulation is, indeed, complemented by other relevant interventions addressing the role of data and digital intermediaries such as the Data Governance Act,4 the Digital Services Act,5 and the proposal for a Data Act,6 which will shape the European digital policy. Against the emergence of large online platforms, several proposals have been advanced by policymakers around the world to tame digital gatekeepers, including public utilities-style regulations, break-ups, bans on vertical integration, and reforms of competition laws.7 Despite such different approaches, however, the envisaged solutions share the same premise, namely the urgent need for bespoke interventions because of the distrust towards current antitrust rules to face effectively the challenges of the brave new world.
2022年10月12日标志着《数字市场法案》(DMA)的正式诞生与《通用数据保护条例》(General Data Protection Regulation)一样,欧盟将自己定位为数字经济规则制定的先驱,试图通过所谓的“布鲁塞尔效应”(Brussels effect)加强其在全球监管方面的领导地位事实上,新法规得到了其他相关干预措施的补充,这些干预措施解决了数据和数字中介机构的作用,如《数据治理法》、《数字服务法》、《数据法》和《数据法》提案,后者将塑造欧洲的数字政策。针对大型在线平台的出现,世界各地的政策制定者提出了一些建议来驯服数字看门人,包括公用事业式的监管、拆分、禁止垂直整合和竞争法改革然而,尽管方法不同,但设想的解决方案都有一个共同的前提,即迫切需要定制干预措施,因为人们对现行反垄断规则的不信任,无法有效地面对美丽新世界的挑战。
期刊介绍:
The journal covers a wide range of enforcement related topics, including: public and private competition law enforcement, cooperation between competition agencies, the promotion of worldwide competition law enforcement, optimal design of enforcement policies, performance measurement, empirical analysis of enforcement policies, combination of functions in the competition agency mandate, and competition agency governance. Other topics include the role of the judiciary in competition enforcement, leniency, cartel prosecution, effective merger enforcement, competition enforcement and human rights, and the regulation of sectors.