Recent metaphors of Brexit in the British press

IF 1.2 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Julia Landmann, Yannick Ganz
{"title":"Recent metaphors of Brexit in the British press","authors":"Julia Landmann, Yannick Ganz","doi":"10.1017/s0266078423000238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the referendum of 23 June 2016, the UK's decision to leave the EU in the course of a Brexit was very close, with 51.9% (Leave) versus 48.1% (Remain). A year after the final withdrawal from the European Union, disillusionment seems to have spread in Great Britain. The focus of previous linguistic studies is mostly on the language used during the Leave and Remain campaigns. Charteris–Black (2019) is the first book-length study to provide a systematic description of the plethora of metaphors of Brexit. His analysis is based on the evaluation of a variety of data published in connection with the Brexit referendum, ranging from newspaper articles to social media posts and cartoons: [ . . . ] once we look under the surface we find that understanding the metaphors of the Brexit debate provides rich insight into the profoundly moral outlooks that influenced both those who sought to leave the European Union and those who wished to remain in it. Members of the public, opinion formers and politicians relied on metaphor as a way of framing political issues and creating persuasive stories and allegories. Understanding these better helps us to understand not only what divided the two sides but also what both sides held in common: a belief and desire that they could improve their country. (Charteris–Black, 2019: 2)","PeriodicalId":51710,"journal":{"name":"English Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078423000238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the referendum of 23 June 2016, the UK's decision to leave the EU in the course of a Brexit was very close, with 51.9% (Leave) versus 48.1% (Remain). A year after the final withdrawal from the European Union, disillusionment seems to have spread in Great Britain. The focus of previous linguistic studies is mostly on the language used during the Leave and Remain campaigns. Charteris–Black (2019) is the first book-length study to provide a systematic description of the plethora of metaphors of Brexit. His analysis is based on the evaluation of a variety of data published in connection with the Brexit referendum, ranging from newspaper articles to social media posts and cartoons: [ . . . ] once we look under the surface we find that understanding the metaphors of the Brexit debate provides rich insight into the profoundly moral outlooks that influenced both those who sought to leave the European Union and those who wished to remain in it. Members of the public, opinion formers and politicians relied on metaphor as a way of framing political issues and creating persuasive stories and allegories. Understanding these better helps us to understand not only what divided the two sides but also what both sides held in common: a belief and desire that they could improve their country. (Charteris–Black, 2019: 2)
英国媒体最近对英国脱欧的比喻
在2016年6月23日的公投中,英国在脱欧过程中决定离开欧盟的票数非常接近,51.9%的人支持脱欧,48.1%的人支持留欧。在英国最终退出欧盟一年之后,幻灭感似乎在英国蔓延开来。以往语言学研究的重点主要是在脱欧和留欧运动期间使用的语言。Charteris-Black(2019)是第一本对英国脱欧的大量隐喻进行系统描述的长篇研究。他的分析是基于对与英国退欧公投有关的各种公布数据的评估,从报纸文章到社交媒体帖子和漫画:[…]一旦我们深入观察,我们就会发现,理解英国脱欧辩论的隐喻,可以让我们深入了解深刻的道德观,这些道德观既影响了那些寻求离开欧盟的人,也影响了那些希望留在欧盟的人。公众、舆论领袖和政治家都依赖隐喻来构建政治问题,创造有说服力的故事和寓言。更好地理解这些,不仅有助于我们理解双方的分歧,也有助于我们理解双方的共同点:他们都有改善自己国家的信念和愿望。(charter - black, 2019: 2)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
English Today
English Today Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信