Related party transactions, ownership structures and cost of debt: evidence from GCC listed firms

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Baban Eulaiwi, Al-Hadi Ahmed Al-Hadi, Lien Duong, Brian Perrin, Grantley Taylor
{"title":"Related party transactions, ownership structures and cost of debt: evidence from GCC listed firms","authors":"Baban Eulaiwi, Al-Hadi Ahmed Al-Hadi, Lien Duong, Brian Perrin, Grantley Taylor","doi":"10.1108/arj-03-2023-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to investigate the relation between firms’ use of related party transactions (RPTs) and cost of debt (COD) in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Design/methodology/approach The authors obtain data from annual reports and the Standard and Poor’s Capital IQ database over the period 2005–2016 period of nonfinancial publicly listed firms on the UAE, KSA, Oman, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar stock exchanges. Using a final sample of 1,810 firm-year observations, the authors empirically assess the relation between strategic use of RPTs, the COD issuance and the moderating effects of governance mechanisms. Findings The authors find that high levels of total RPTs and purchase-based RPTs increase firms’ COD. Furthermore, propping of sales through increased sale-based RPTs is found not to have a significant effect on firms’ COD. The authors also find that ownership factors pertaining to family member founding and royal family ownership negatively moderate the association between the firm’s RPTs and COD. Additionally, the voluntary formation of executive committees has a positive and significant mediating effect on the relation between firms’ purchase-based RPTs and COD. The results are robust to several additional tests and alternative measurement specifications. Research limitations/implications The positive relationship between purchase-based RPTs and firm financing costs is magnified in countries with high quality of RPT disclosures. This has implications for funding of GCC entities by governments and financial institutions. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to examine how wealth transfer via RPTs in the GCC region is associated with higher COD. The authors also contribute to the outcome of emerging governance regimes in the GCC, which could impact the level of credit risk and/or default risk faced by a firm and, thus, the relation between RPTs and COD. In doing so, the authors provide a more nuanced study by investigating the potential channels that could account for such a relation in an emerging market setting.","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-03-2023-0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relation between firms’ use of related party transactions (RPTs) and cost of debt (COD) in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Design/methodology/approach The authors obtain data from annual reports and the Standard and Poor’s Capital IQ database over the period 2005–2016 period of nonfinancial publicly listed firms on the UAE, KSA, Oman, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar stock exchanges. Using a final sample of 1,810 firm-year observations, the authors empirically assess the relation between strategic use of RPTs, the COD issuance and the moderating effects of governance mechanisms. Findings The authors find that high levels of total RPTs and purchase-based RPTs increase firms’ COD. Furthermore, propping of sales through increased sale-based RPTs is found not to have a significant effect on firms’ COD. The authors also find that ownership factors pertaining to family member founding and royal family ownership negatively moderate the association between the firm’s RPTs and COD. Additionally, the voluntary formation of executive committees has a positive and significant mediating effect on the relation between firms’ purchase-based RPTs and COD. The results are robust to several additional tests and alternative measurement specifications. Research limitations/implications The positive relationship between purchase-based RPTs and firm financing costs is magnified in countries with high quality of RPT disclosures. This has implications for funding of GCC entities by governments and financial institutions. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to examine how wealth transfer via RPTs in the GCC region is associated with higher COD. The authors also contribute to the outcome of emerging governance regimes in the GCC, which could impact the level of credit risk and/or default risk faced by a firm and, thus, the relation between RPTs and COD. In doing so, the authors provide a more nuanced study by investigating the potential channels that could account for such a relation in an emerging market setting.
关联方交易、所有权结构和债务成本:来自海湾合作委员会上市公司的证据
本研究旨在探讨海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家企业使用关联方交易(RPTs)与债务成本(COD)之间的关系。作者从阿联酋、沙特阿拉伯、阿曼、巴林、科威特和卡塔尔证券交易所的非金融上市公司2005-2016年的年度报告和标准普尔资本智商数据库中获取数据。利用1810个公司年观察的最终样本,作者实证评估了RPTs的战略使用、COD发行和治理机制的调节效应之间的关系。作者发现,高水平的总RPTs和基于采购的RPTs增加了企业的COD。此外,通过增加基于销售的RPTs来支持销售对企业的COD没有显著影响。作者还发现,与家族成员创立和王室所有权相关的所有权因素负向调节了公司RPTs与COD之间的关系。此外,执行委员会自愿组成对企业采购型绩效与COD之间的关系具有显著的正向中介作用。结果对一些额外的测试和替代的测量规范是稳健的。研究局限/启示:在RPT披露质量高的国家,基于采购的RPT与企业融资成本之间的正相关关系被放大。这对各国政府和金融机构为海湾合作委员会实体提供资金产生了影响。据作者所知,本研究首次考察了海湾合作委员会地区通过rpt进行的财富转移与较高的COD之间的关系。作者还对海湾合作委员会新兴治理制度的结果做出了贡献,这些制度可能会影响公司面临的信用风险和/或违约风险水平,从而影响rpt与COD之间的关系。在此过程中,作者通过调查在新兴市场环境中可能解释这种关系的潜在渠道,提供了一项更细致入微的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信