The clinical utility of Multidimensional Behavioral Health Screen

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Scott A. Davis, Daniel Frayne, Jessica McSurdy, Annabel O. Franz, David Mark McCord
{"title":"The clinical utility of Multidimensional Behavioral Health Screen","authors":"Scott A. Davis, Daniel Frayne, Jessica McSurdy, Annabel O. Franz, David Mark McCord","doi":"10.1108/jica-02-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose In the USA, integrated care remains largely aspirational; a majority of Americans receive mental health care entirely within the primary medical care outpatient setting. A new instrument, the Multidimensional Behavioral Health Screen (MBHS) ( McCord, 2020) was developed specifically to address this gap by systematically screening for a broad array of mental health issues in every patient, every visit. The goal of this current feasibility study was to evaluate the perceptions of the primary medical care providers regarding the usefulness and practicality of the MBHS, a necessary step toward broad-based implementation. Design/methodology/approach The MBHS was given to 101 consenting patients in a primary medical outpatient setting, each of whom was then seen by one of six participating primary care providers (PCPs). Providers completed a brief survey rating the ease of use, understandability, helpfulness and perceived accuracy of the MBHS after each patient visit and a final summary survey at the conclusion of the study. Findings Ratings were very positive overall, and the MBHS was clearly preferred to the traditional screening measures (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]). Providers offered suggestions for improvement and particularly for implementation. Research limitations/implications The small sample size (101 patients and 6 PCPs) and limited geographical reach may limit generalizability. Surveying providers using similar methodology should be done with larger numbers of providers and more diverse primary medical care settings. Practical implications This study provides evidence that the MBHS may be significantly effective in operationalizing the integrated care model in United States (US) healthcare systems. Social implications The MBHS, a new behavioral health screening tool, was perceived by providers as useful in identifying mental health issues and guiding treatment decisions in the primary care setting. Originality/value This paper identifies a novel screening instrument that implements new and emerging models of psychological dysfunction in a practical way in primary medical care, making integrated care a reality rather than an aspiration.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-02-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose In the USA, integrated care remains largely aspirational; a majority of Americans receive mental health care entirely within the primary medical care outpatient setting. A new instrument, the Multidimensional Behavioral Health Screen (MBHS) ( McCord, 2020) was developed specifically to address this gap by systematically screening for a broad array of mental health issues in every patient, every visit. The goal of this current feasibility study was to evaluate the perceptions of the primary medical care providers regarding the usefulness and practicality of the MBHS, a necessary step toward broad-based implementation. Design/methodology/approach The MBHS was given to 101 consenting patients in a primary medical outpatient setting, each of whom was then seen by one of six participating primary care providers (PCPs). Providers completed a brief survey rating the ease of use, understandability, helpfulness and perceived accuracy of the MBHS after each patient visit and a final summary survey at the conclusion of the study. Findings Ratings were very positive overall, and the MBHS was clearly preferred to the traditional screening measures (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]). Providers offered suggestions for improvement and particularly for implementation. Research limitations/implications The small sample size (101 patients and 6 PCPs) and limited geographical reach may limit generalizability. Surveying providers using similar methodology should be done with larger numbers of providers and more diverse primary medical care settings. Practical implications This study provides evidence that the MBHS may be significantly effective in operationalizing the integrated care model in United States (US) healthcare systems. Social implications The MBHS, a new behavioral health screening tool, was perceived by providers as useful in identifying mental health issues and guiding treatment decisions in the primary care setting. Originality/value This paper identifies a novel screening instrument that implements new and emerging models of psychological dysfunction in a practical way in primary medical care, making integrated care a reality rather than an aspiration.
多维行为健康筛查的临床应用
在美国,综合护理在很大程度上仍然是理想的;大多数美国人完全在初级医疗门诊环境中接受精神卫生保健。多维行为健康筛查(MBHS) (McCord, 2020)是专门为解决这一差距而开发的一种新工具,通过系统地筛查每位患者每次就诊的各种心理健康问题来解决这一差距。当前可行性研究的目的是评估初级医疗保健提供者对MBHS的有用性和实用性的看法,这是广泛实施的必要步骤。设计/方法/方法在初级医疗门诊环境中对101名同意的患者进行MBHS,然后由六名参与的初级保健提供者(pcp)中的一名进行治疗。提供者在每位患者就诊后完成一份简短的调查,对MBHS的易用性、可理解性、有用性和感知准确性进行评分,并在研究结束时完成一份最终的总结调查。结果:总体评分非常积极,MBHS明显优于传统的筛查措施(患者健康问卷-9 [PHQ-9]和广泛性焦虑障碍-7 [GAD-7])。提供方提出了改进建议,特别是实施建议。研究局限性/意义小样本量(101名患者和6名pcp)和有限的地理覆盖范围可能限制了推广。应在更多的提供者和更多样化的初级医疗保健环境中使用类似的方法对提供者进行调查。本研究提供的证据表明,MBHS可能在美国(美国)医疗保健系统的综合护理模式的运作显著有效。社会影响MBHS是一种新的行为健康筛查工具,提供者认为它在识别心理健康问题和指导初级保健环境中的治疗决策方面很有用。原创性/价值本文确定了一种新的筛查工具,在初级医疗保健中以实用的方式实现了新的和新兴的心理功能障碍模型,使综合护理成为现实,而不是一种愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信