Public relations professionals' views of moral entrepreneurship: an exploration of the concept, its benefits and barriers

Elina Erzikova, Diana Martinelli
{"title":"Public relations professionals' views of moral entrepreneurship: an exploration of the concept, its benefits and barriers","authors":"Elina Erzikova, Diana Martinelli","doi":"10.1108/ccij-02-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine US public relations professionals' perceptions of the benefits and challenges associated with the concept of moral entrepreneurship, defined as the purposeful process of changing or creating new institutionalized ethical norms. This study argues that the concept of moral entrepreneurship provides organizations with a potentially valuable framework to actively recognize societal pressures and problems and act accordingly to better the environment in which the organization resides and operates. Design/methodology/approach This exploratory study uses purposive in-depth interviews with 25 diverse public relations professionals, who represented communication firms, in-house public relations departments, higher education, nonprofits and government. Findings Respondents assigned a high value to the concept of moral entrepreneurship: In addition to its being viewed as the right thing to do, they recognized its practice as a way to help organizations recruit and retain employee talent and improve stakeholder trust. However, based on the interviews, organizational leadership is the primary initiator of ethical changes; therefore, without a seat at the management table, practitioners lack the influence to initiate such new organizational directions and take on the role of moral entrepreneurs only when directed to do so by their superiors. Barriers to adopting a moral entrepreneurship approach included a limited budget and shortage of staff, employees' resistance to change, fear of failure, poor leadership and a politically polarized workplace. Practical implications Practice implications include considerations for furthering moral entrepreneurship in organizations. Originality/value This study is the first to explore the applicability of the concept of moral entrepreneurship in public relations. The paper underscores the need for further discussion around novel approaches to ethics in public relations that go beyond simple compliance with professional codes and industry standards and that help organizations lead societal change.","PeriodicalId":10696,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-02-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine US public relations professionals' perceptions of the benefits and challenges associated with the concept of moral entrepreneurship, defined as the purposeful process of changing or creating new institutionalized ethical norms. This study argues that the concept of moral entrepreneurship provides organizations with a potentially valuable framework to actively recognize societal pressures and problems and act accordingly to better the environment in which the organization resides and operates. Design/methodology/approach This exploratory study uses purposive in-depth interviews with 25 diverse public relations professionals, who represented communication firms, in-house public relations departments, higher education, nonprofits and government. Findings Respondents assigned a high value to the concept of moral entrepreneurship: In addition to its being viewed as the right thing to do, they recognized its practice as a way to help organizations recruit and retain employee talent and improve stakeholder trust. However, based on the interviews, organizational leadership is the primary initiator of ethical changes; therefore, without a seat at the management table, practitioners lack the influence to initiate such new organizational directions and take on the role of moral entrepreneurs only when directed to do so by their superiors. Barriers to adopting a moral entrepreneurship approach included a limited budget and shortage of staff, employees' resistance to change, fear of failure, poor leadership and a politically polarized workplace. Practical implications Practice implications include considerations for furthering moral entrepreneurship in organizations. Originality/value This study is the first to explore the applicability of the concept of moral entrepreneurship in public relations. The paper underscores the need for further discussion around novel approaches to ethics in public relations that go beyond simple compliance with professional codes and industry standards and that help organizations lead societal change.
公共关系专业人士对道德创业的看法:对道德创业的概念、利益和障碍的探索
本文的目的是研究美国公共关系专业人士对与道德创业概念相关的利益和挑战的看法,道德创业被定义为改变或创造新的制度化道德规范的有目的的过程。本研究认为,道德创业的概念为组织提供了一个潜在的有价值的框架,以积极地认识到社会压力和问题,并采取相应的行动,以改善组织生存和运作的环境。本探索性研究对25位不同的公关专业人士进行了有目的的深度访谈,他们分别代表了传播公司、内部公关部门、高等教育机构、非营利组织和政府。调查结果受访者对道德创业的概念给予了很高的评价:除了被视为正确的事情之外,他们还认识到这种做法是帮助组织招募和留住员工人才以及提高利益相关者信任的一种方式。然而,根据访谈,组织领导是道德变革的主要发起者;因此,如果没有管理席位,从业者就缺乏影响力来发起这种新的组织方向,只有在上级的指示下才承担道德企业家的角色。采用道德创业方法的障碍包括有限的预算和人手短缺、员工对变革的抵制、对失败的恐惧、糟糕的领导和政治两极分化的工作场所。实践意义实践意义包括在组织中促进道德企业家精神的考虑。本研究首次探讨道德创业概念在公共关系中的适用性。这篇论文强调,需要进一步讨论新的公共关系伦理方法,这些方法不仅要遵循专业规范和行业标准,还要帮助组织引领社会变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信