Similarities and special features of modern approaches to surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures of tibial proximal and distal metaepiphyses

{"title":"Similarities and special features of modern approaches to surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures of tibial proximal and distal metaepiphyses","authors":"","doi":"10.36422/23076348-2023-11-3-56-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryIntroduction. Analysis of special scientific literature concerning the modern principles of diagnostics, preop-erative planning and surgical treatment of intra- articular fractures of two localizations: proximal and distal me-taepiphyses of the tibia, was carried out. Aim of the review. To evaluate, through the analysis of specialized scientific publications, similarities and differences in classification approaches, diagnostic methods, princi-ples of planning and performing osteosynthesis in pa-tients with intra-articular fractures of the proximal and distal metaepiphyses of the tibia. It is noted that the modern classifications of both tibial plateau and pilon fractures are based on the column theory. A thorough analysis of computed tomography data is necessary to precisely determine the fracture pattern. On this ba-sis, osteosynthesis surgeries are planned as to provide fixation of all damaged columns. Authors discuss the combinations of surgical approaches necessary for this purpose. Variants of osteosynthesis are also considered, with special attention paid to fixation of the posterior aspects of the tibial plateau and pilon. The differences in approaches to surgical treatment of patients with frac-tures of the tibial plateau and pilon are primarily due to a significant difference in the overall size of the tibia in the area of the knee and ankle joints and, in particular, with a significantly smaller volume of soft tissues at the level of the distal metaepiphysis of the tibia. These dif-ferences in anatomy should be taken into account by surgeons when choosing surgical approaches for osteo-synthesis of the discussed fractures. Conclusion. Adher-ence to the classical principles of surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures with the use of modern surgical approaches and osteosynthesis techniques is a sure way to improve specialized trauma care for a complex category of patients with intra-articular fractures of the proximal and distal tibial metaepiphyses, which should help to reduce the incidence of postoperative complica-tions and improve treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":489032,"journal":{"name":"Medicinskij alʹâns","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinskij alʹâns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36422/23076348-2023-11-3-56-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryIntroduction. Analysis of special scientific literature concerning the modern principles of diagnostics, preop-erative planning and surgical treatment of intra- articular fractures of two localizations: proximal and distal me-taepiphyses of the tibia, was carried out. Aim of the review. To evaluate, through the analysis of specialized scientific publications, similarities and differences in classification approaches, diagnostic methods, princi-ples of planning and performing osteosynthesis in pa-tients with intra-articular fractures of the proximal and distal metaepiphyses of the tibia. It is noted that the modern classifications of both tibial plateau and pilon fractures are based on the column theory. A thorough analysis of computed tomography data is necessary to precisely determine the fracture pattern. On this ba-sis, osteosynthesis surgeries are planned as to provide fixation of all damaged columns. Authors discuss the combinations of surgical approaches necessary for this purpose. Variants of osteosynthesis are also considered, with special attention paid to fixation of the posterior aspects of the tibial plateau and pilon. The differences in approaches to surgical treatment of patients with frac-tures of the tibial plateau and pilon are primarily due to a significant difference in the overall size of the tibia in the area of the knee and ankle joints and, in particular, with a significantly smaller volume of soft tissues at the level of the distal metaepiphysis of the tibia. These dif-ferences in anatomy should be taken into account by surgeons when choosing surgical approaches for osteo-synthesis of the discussed fractures. Conclusion. Adher-ence to the classical principles of surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures with the use of modern surgical approaches and osteosynthesis techniques is a sure way to improve specialized trauma care for a complex category of patients with intra-articular fractures of the proximal and distal tibial metaepiphyses, which should help to reduce the incidence of postoperative complica-tions and improve treatment outcomes.
胫后骺近端和远端关节内骨折的现代手术治疗方法的异同与特点
SummaryIntroduction。本文分析了有关胫骨骺端和骺端近端关节内骨折的现代诊断原则、术前计划和手术治疗的特殊科学文献。回顾的目的。通过对专业科学文献的分析,评价胫骨近端和远端骨骺后端关节内骨折患者在分类方法、诊断方法、计划和实施植骨术原则方面的异同。值得注意的是,胫骨平台和皮隆骨折的现代分类都是基于柱理论。为了精确地确定骨折类型,需要对计算机断层扫描数据进行彻底的分析。在此基础上,计划进行植骨手术以固定所有受损的立柱。作者讨论了为此目的所必需的手术入路组合。我们也考虑了不同的植骨方法,特别注意胫骨平台和皮隆后侧的固定。胫骨平台和皮隆骨折患者手术治疗方法的差异主要是由于膝关节和踝关节区域的胫骨总体大小存在显著差异,特别是胫骨远端骨骺后段的软组织体积明显较小。外科医生在选择手术入路对所讨论的骨折进行骨合成时应考虑到这些解剖学上的差异。结论。坚持关节内骨折的经典手术治疗原则,结合现代手术入路和骨固定技术,是改善复杂类型胫骨后骺近端和远端关节内骨折患者创伤专科护理的必然途径,有助于减少术后并发症的发生,提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信